Jump to content

Any interest in Josh Bell?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Just now, interloper said:

I like Stowers, but he's not factoring into any of my off-season decisions. He's not a big enough prospect and didn't prove enough to have that kind of pull yet. So I just kind of worry about him later, hopefully he makes an impact one way or another. 

Is Bell at 1B, Santander at DH, Stowers at RF (Mountcastle trade)

better than

Bell at DH, Santander at RF, Mounty at 1B (Stowers 4th OF)? 

 

Depends what we get back in the Mountcastle trade.    It also depends on what Stowers does as a full-time player.   I'd rather roll the dice on option 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Ok.  Let's say he DH's 30 games.   Fair enough?   He DH'd 23 last year.

30 games would not stop me from getting a DH type. Brantley and JDM are two names I would have interest in. 
 

What Elias does with the lineup will be fascinating. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

I am fine with that. I don’t want Santander much in the OF. If he stays he needs to be the main DH obviously. 
 

I think they are a ton of different directions Elias could go. 

Josh Bell is a career .812 OPS player.   Wouldn't it be a kick in the head if we trade Stowers and that's what he is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RZNJ said:

Josh Bell is a career .812 OPS player.   Wouldn't it be a kick in the head if we trade Stowers and that's what he is?

Then they should move him to 1B and deal Mountcastle. 
 

A big part of Elias’ job will be internal evaluations. That goes without saying. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, eddie83 said:

Then they should move him to 1B and deal Mountcastle. 
 

A big part of Elias’ job will be internal evaluations. That goes without saying. 

I don't think 1B is an option for Stowers or we would have seen some sign of it.   Stowers and Santander would share DH/RF.    Again, If Bell was acquired I would think it would be to replace Mountcastle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tabletop said:

30 people had an OPS higher than .812 last year so that would be something if Stowers turns into a career .812 OPS guy.

Well, he was .880 in AAA last year and .764 in September which is the only time he got regular AB's.   He has improved each of the least 2 years.   I wouldn't put an .812 OPS past him for next year but there's only one way to find out.

As Eddie said, I'll leave it to Elias and company to decide which of these younger players are keepers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RZNJ said:

I don't think 1B is an option for Stowers or we would have seen some sign of it.   Stowers and Santander would share DH/RF.    Again, If Bell was acquired I would think it would be to replace Mountcastle.

Ryan could possibly stay if Santander goes. Obviously 1 of the 2.  
 

Once we see the Orioles first move position player wise we can start to put the puzzle together. Curious how it all plays out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • All of what you posted is why you have to take both dWAR and fWAR with a grain of salt when it comes to valuing defense.  OAA strictly gives you how good a player is at his position vs other players at his position. There is no guessing involved. Now could OAA receive some tweaking, especially with infielders, I think so. I don't think OAA is perfect by any means, but let's say Santana did save his team 12 runs and let's say a SS was at 0 runs saved. Why should he be penalized for playing a less stressful position? In the end he did save runs vs a SS that didn't save or lose runs. I guess in the end you look at all the defensive metrics (OAA, dWAR, DRS) and then make your opinion based off them. I also use my scouting eye and watching most of the games, I'd say Cowser is an above average defensive outfielder with plus arm strength and way below average accuracy.
    • Burnes and Eflin were fantastic keeping the team moving forward in a year Felix, Bradish and Grayson were mostly gone. It is fuzzy for me if you combine Elias' team's results in the cases of Albert Suarez and Trevor Rogers if that's a good job or a bad job. Some talk about people like Pivetta, but I don't see a ton of April/May/June demand.     Eflin, Grayson, Kremer, Povich and Suarez leave Rogers, McDermott and Young 6/7/8 already.    Are those guys ever going to pitch? Povich and Suarez showed enough in September it seems worth it to see April. We rarely see a decision Elias doesn't like to defer, and the first half of 2025 will give information how the roster needs to be managed.    How strong is Felix?    What setbacks do Bradish and Wells have?    Can Grayson hold up more than 2 straight months? Elias is building a body of work he'll win the bids for Corbin Burnes and Zach Eflin when necessary, but I don't think this winter is one of those times.
    • OAA and dWAR are two measure that people use to determine if a player is a good defensive player or not. They absolutely can be mentioned when talking defense. They both measure the defensive ability of a player, though they do it differently. Acting like it some kind of horror to mention them together is one of the more ridiculous stances I've ever seen you take here.  NOBODY said they measure the exact same thing and the EXACT same way, but they absolutely are two measures people use to determine if a player is good defensively.  OAA shows Cowser to be a well above average defensive outfielder while dWAR shows Cowser to be more average. I think OAA in this case absolutely is a better indicator of Cowser's defensive ability. 
    • Cowser has not exactly been great down the stretch this year. That WPA is from his unclutchness.  Saying that, Gil has not exactly been a world beater his last two months of the season either. Gil also gets the New York bonus from some in the media so I still think he'll get the nod. But maybe Cowser can pull it off despite the K's and unclutchness.  
    • 1. It's not too hard to cherry pick guys who had success in hindsight. The problem is picking those guys in advance. Not sure what your point is here. Yes, it would suck losing to a pitcher like Lugo but maybe Danny Coulombe gets some big outs or Ramon Urias is the series MVP.  2. Last year we choked. Hope it's different this year. Also let's not forget the opponent matters. Sometimes you run into a buzzsaw, it happens.  3. We have all the pieces necessary to win a championship but there are 11 other teams and it's hard to win the WS. Yes, we have weaknesses. If I had to guess, we will beat KC but fall short of the championship. Whatever happens, go O's.   
    • Can't see them sitting Cowser. He hasn't sat much against lefties all year.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...