Jump to content

Rosenthal: Angels looking to upgrade SS, not likely to get any of the big 4 FAs


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

https://theathletic.com/3971929/2022/12/05/mlb-free-agent-news-verlander/?source=user_shared_article

• The Angels are looking to upgrade at shortstop and remain in position to spend, but their immediate focus is a back-end reliever.

At the moment, the Angels’ options at short are Andrew Velazquez, Luis Rengifo and David Fletcher. The big four shortstops — Turner, Carlos Correa, Bogaerts and Dansby Swanson — are more likely to join clubs in better position to contend

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

This could be a destination for Mateo. 

They got 1.1 fWAR out of their SS in 2022.

If they aren’t going to get one of the big FAs, what is out there that is better than Mateo?

Do they have anything worthwhile to give us in a trade? Mateo is clearly a fit for them, sure, but he's also one of the reasons (according to Ken) that Gibson signed here ("infield defense"). I don't think we can run out Jordan Westburg or even Gunnar at SS and claim to have a proven infield defense.

I don't really see Mateo as a trade candidate for that reason, unless the Orioles miraculously end up with one of the Big 4. Right now, Mateo is your proven SS with the big defensive metrics. I'm not trading him just to give Westburg or Ortiz a turn at SS. 

Edited by interloper
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, interloper said:

Do they have anything worthwhile to give us in a trade? Mateo is clearly a fit for them, sure, but he's also one of the reasons (according to Ken) that Gibson signed here ("infield defense"). I don't think we can run out Jordan Westburg of even Gunnar at SS and claim to have a proven infield defense.

I don't really see Mateo as a trade candidate for that reason, unless the Orioles miraculously end up with one of the Big 4. Right now, Mateo is your proven SS with the big defensive metrics. 

Is Gibson going to unsign here if we move Mateo in January?  Not sure that's how that works.

And do you know, without seeing the product, that an IF of Urias/Gunnar/Westburg is defensively worse than Gunnar/Mateo/Urias?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MarCakes21 said:

Is Gibson going to unsign here if we move Mateo in January?  Not sure that's how that works.

And do you know, without seeing the product, that an IF of Urias/Gunnar/Westburg is defensively worse than Gunnar/Mateo/Urias?

No, I don't know that for sure. It might be fine. I just don't think the O's are going to get enough for Mateo to make it worthwhile to (possibly) hinder their defense at SS as well as their depth. 

It's just not a priority to trade someone like Mateo, unless it's in a package for a legit young SP, which the Angels don't really have. But even then I'm not sure Mateo moves the needle in that package all that much. 

Edited by interloper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, interloper said:

No, I don't know that for sure. It might be fine. I just don't think the O's are going to get enough for Mateo to make it worthwhile to (possibly) hinder their defense at SS as well as their depth. 

It's just not a priority to trade someone like Mateo, unless it's in a package for a legit young SP, which the Angels don't really have. But even then I'm not sure Mateo moves the needle in that package all that much. 

It’s not a priority for you. You have zero idea if it’s a priority for the Os, yet you are out here talking as if what you are saying is a fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, interloper said:

No, I don't know that for sure. It might be fine. I just don't think the O's are going to get enough for Mateo to make it worthwhile to (possibly) hinder their defense at SS as well as their depth. 

It's just not a priority to trade someone like Mateo, unless it's in a package for a legit young SP, which the Angels don't really have. But even then I'm not sure Mateo moves the needle in that package all that much. 

If Gunnar can be a ML Shortstop I'd like to see him at Shortstop.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

It’s not a priority for you. You have zero idea if it’s a priority for the Os, yet you are out here talking as if what you are saying is a fact.

No, just my opinion. The O's could do anything! I don't think trading Mateo to the Angels for.... ??? who exactly... is something they're interested in. JMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, interloper said:

No, I don't know that for sure. It might be fine. I just don't think the O's are going to get enough for Mateo to make it worthwhile to (possibly) hinder their defense at SS as well as their depth. 

It's just not a priority to trade someone like Mateo, unless it's in a package for a legit young SP, which the Angels don't really have. 

 MVP candidate Shohei Ohtani again makes MLB history in last game of season  | Fox News

😀

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean, there are obviously guys they can trade for Mateo that makes sense for both sides. 
 

What the Angels can’t do is go out and get an elite SS unless the take their money or they find a player coming off a poor year and has a big contract that they will be absorb (Baez?).

But how about a deal involving Ben Joyce?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • This is accurate based on pockets.  But the Yankees have positive Cash Flow even with the huge payroll, because they are the richest franchise in the MLB.  The fact that the owner can fund higher salaries is certainly important, but it isn't the same thing as team revenue.
    • These two paragraphs are not congruent.  I disagree that the Orioles have to resign Burnes.  I think they should be in on him, but they don't have to sign him. I completely agree that if they do not sign him the have to have another TOR.  I think counting on Bradish to return is a poor decision.  You hope so, but planning on it would be weak.  Same with assuming #2 status for Rodriquez.  His case is stronger of course, but still.  We have some depth IF we have a TOR and that should be Burnes or someone comparable.  
    • There are several. Snell, Pivetta, Bieber (depending on structure of the contract), Nick Martinez (swing type guy) and Heaney.  May be others. This is off the top of my head.
    • I think this is correct but I would say it differently.  I think Elias has done a great job constructing the organization and making it one of the top teams, complete teams, in baseball.  That was a huge hurdle from where he started and that has been a major success. Getting from a top MLB team to a successful playoff team may seem like a small jump but it is pretty large.  And Elias has been tentative at best at trying to make those changes.  He has taken an incremental path in hopes of maximizing his long term potential.  So far that really hasn't had much success.   But like Elias, we really should not assume that the changes needed to make that seemingly small jump from AL East contender to WS contender will not require some pretty big things.  I don't know if that is really different than what you are saying.  
    • It was never in hindsight. The Os were always against it. We had the numbers. We knew how bad it was going to effect the team.   That is why the MaSN deal was structured the way it was. It benefited the Os for a reason. That was essentially the compromise to having the team move to DC.
    • The Mets just had more exciting wins in one week than we had in four months.  I called us the Dull Orange Machine a few weeks ago for a reason.  Really boring team most of the season, with no personality at all.  They seemed to have a "get knocked down, stay down" mentality, which isn't fun to support as a fan.  There are a lot of very good reasons noted here as to why attendance wasn't great, but the energy around this team and the organization is just low and that can't help.  And a slow and boring offseason that doesn't move the needle much won't help attendance heading into next season either.  
    • This.  I grew up in Northern VA and it always took 1 hour to drive to Memorial or Camden no matter the time of day.  It was always easy to find parking as well.  Now that same drive takes 2-3 hours, and finding good parking is a pain.  Plus, the cost of parking, tickets, food/drinks, souvenirs has skyrocketed.  So the choice is to sit in traffic, fight for parking, pay tons of money for the hassle...or sit on my comfortable couch and watch the game on a huge HD screen for free...
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...