Jump to content

Bryan Reynolds Trade?


DrinkinWithFermi

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

He earns no benefit of the doubt if he doesn’t think this team is ready to contend.  That’s just a bad way of looking at things, if that’s how he’s looking at them.

May be but I'm just looking at his actions. Unless he's making big offers and just getting turned down which I would doubt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrinkinWithFermi said:

There has been some talk here about trading for the bat Elias wants instead of a pitcher and then signing a decent free agent pitcher like Bassitt or Eovaldi, and since Kyle Stowers seems to be disliked by management for some reason despite appearing to have solid potential, I wonder if he could be used as part of a package for Bryan Reynolds' remaining 3 years of control. Of course much more would be needed and Pittsburgh claims they won't trade him, but he recently turned down an extension offer that he allegedly found insulting and subsequently requested a trade, so it's really only a matter of time until they either have to trade him or risk getting nothing substantial for him. From what I have read, they are pretty well-stocked on IF prospects, so young OFs and pitchers would seem like things that would interest them.

Would Stowers, Cowser, and Hall be enough to keep them on the phone? Stowers would give them an MLB-ready OF coming off a decent debut with a full 6 years of control to immediately plug into their lineup, and Cowser and Hall would give them a pair of near-ready top 100 prospects to dream on. You'd probably need to include at least one more piece, maybe a lower minors arm with solid upside that they find interesting?

The guy is a legit MOO switch hitter that has OPS'd over .800 against both RHPs and LHPs for his career and he gets on base at a good clip, which would be a great addition to the Orioles offense, plus he is originally from Baltimore, which would be a neat bonus.

Why trade for him if we won’t pay him either?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Os get:

Lopez

Marlins get:

Reynolds

Mateo or Urias

Pirates get:

Rogers

Stowers

Norby

Prospect in the 5-10 range in Miami system.

 

Works out to this:

Os deal Norby, Stowers and Urias/Mateo for Lopez

Pirates deal Reynolds for Norby, Stowers, Rogers and Miami prospect 

Marlins trade Rogers, Lopez and a prospect for Reynolds.

 

I would argue that the Os should get another player back but I think something like this could work. 

Edited by Sports Guy
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Os get:

Lopez

Marlins get:

Reynolds

Mateo or Urias

Pirates get:

Rogers

Stowers

Norby

Prospect in the 5-10 range in Miami system.

 

Works out to this:

Os deal Norby, Stowers and Urias/Mateo for Lopez

Pirates deal Reynolds for Norby, Stowers, Rogers and Miami prospect 

Marlins trade Rogers, Lopez and a prospect for Reynolds.

 

I would argue that the Os should get another player back but I think something like this could work. 

Ok. Fair trade for the Pirates, IMO.   I'm on board with the O's side of it although we are overpaying a bit (as I did with an almost identical trade.      Marlins seem like they are giving up a lot.

Edited by RZNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Os get:

Lopez

Marlins get:

Reynolds

Mateo or Urias

Pirates get:

Rogers

Stowers

Norby

Prospect in the 5-10 range in Miami system.

 

Works out to this:

Os deal Norby, Stowers and Urias/Mateo for Lopez

Pirates deal Reynolds for Norby, Stowers, Rogers and Miami prospect 

Marlins trade Rogers, Lopez and a prospect for Reynolds.

 

I would argue that the Os should get another player back but I think something like this could work. 

Ok deal but why do we need a 3 teamer to get one player. Seems we could trade the three guys and get him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Roll Tide said:

Ok deal but why do we need a 3 teamer to get one player. Seems we could trade the three guys and get him.

Well like I said, the Marlins and Pirates don’t necessarily need us but that doesn’t mean we don’t trade.

Miami’s biggest need/desire is a good CFer. If we won’t trade ours, maybe Pitt will trade there’s, since he has asked for a trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Well like I said, the Marlins and Pirates don’t necessarily need us but that doesn’t mean we don’t trade.

Miami’s biggest need/desire is a good CFer. If we won’t trade ours, maybe Pitt will trade there’s, since he has asked for a trade.

I got it now

 

Here’s what I propose …. 
 

Orioles: Reynolds 

Pirates: Wells, Hays, and Norby

 

Orioles: Lopez

Marlins: Mullins

Edited by Roll Tide
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Well like I said, the Marlins and Pirates don’t necessarily need us but that doesn’t mean we don’t trade.

Miami’s biggest need/desire is a good CFer. If we won’t trade ours, maybe Pitt will trade there’s, since he has asked for a trade.

Reynolds is stretched as a CF defensively.   I believe is below average out there.   Marlins have a big park.   Just saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, E-D-D-I-E said:

Why all the love for Lopez? Maybe because he is all that you guys think is left? His second half wasn't good and that's a sign of 'they figured him out'. He is risky imo and I would move on. 

He finished the season with 6 starts with good peripherals and a 4.26 ERA.    His walk/strikeout numbers were consistently strong each month.   I don’t think they figured him out.  I think he’s good, not great but he’s only 27, has steadily progressed in his career, and has a great changeup.   And, yeah, he’s available apparently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/8/2022 at 5:04 PM, Roll Tide said:

I got it now

 

Here’s what I propose …. 
 

Orioles: Reynolds 

Pirates: Wells, Hays, and Norby

 

Orioles: Lopez

Marlins: Mullins

I don't know why we'd swap Reynolds for Mullins. That just complicates the deal and doesn't really give us an upgrade. (Both fWAR and bWAR have Mullins slightly ahead of Reynolds last year). To me the purpose of a three way deal would be to get Lopez while being able to keep Mullins, giving up only prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

I don't know why we'd swap Reynolds for Mullins. That just complicates the deal and doesn't really give us an upgrade. (Both fWAR and bWAR have Mullins slightly ahead of Reynolds last year). To me the purpose of a three way deal would be to get Lopez while being able to keep Mullins, giving up only prospects.

You misunderstood….I do two separate trades. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Roll Tide said:

You misunderstood….I do two separate trades. 

I see. Given how unlikely it is for trades to come together, I highly doubt we will see two separate trades. I would definitely not pull the trigger on the Marlins first, leaving us with a hole CF and needing to outbid other teams on Reynolds.

Also that deal is not close to getting Reynolds. Probably need to include Cowser at a minimum. They will want Holliday. Norby-plus isn't close. For what it's worth Trade Simulator has Reynolds as a 60, Norby-Wells-Hays barely gets you to 30.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/8/2022 at 2:44 PM, Roll Tide said:

Why trade for him if we won’t pay him either?

Because he is an extremely good player with 3 full years of control.

On 12/8/2022 at 5:04 PM, Roll Tide said:

I got it now

 

Here’s what I propose …. 
 

Orioles: Reynolds 

Pirates: Wells, Hays, and Norby

 

Orioles: Lopez

Marlins: Mullins

Pittsburgh would laugh hysterically at that offer and then hang up on us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Read the ninth post on page one I wrote. That should have been the last post in this dumpster fire of a thread. Lol
    • What if he bats .100 for the next month?
    • I agree. And I think he has a higher upside than Kjerstad because he's actually a very good fielder. He's a guy that I think deserves regular playing time.
    • Back when we DFA'd Bauman, I said the right move would have been sending down Akin. He's just not very good. Sure he'll tease you with a month or two of good ball but he's very average. Cano is Cano. He had his 15 minutes of fame. He intimidates no one. And that's what you need from a high leverage guy. Vieira --- no need mincing words here --- he's not just a project, he stinks. Everyone has tried to fix his command issue and everyone has failed.  On the other hand, while he's no Bautista I don't mind rolling with Kimbrel this year. I like Coulombe. I think Perez, Webb and Tate are "ok".  The overall issue is that this bullpen isn't the bullpen a championship squad needs. Elias should have known that. Maybe he thought the offense and starting pitching would make up for our bullpen deficiencies. No team is perfect, I get that. I just don't know how a guy as bright as Elias thought this bullpen would be good enough coming out of Spring Training. Let's hope he makes some moves to get us a couple quality relievers.
    • From my understanding of the data the impetus for pulling pitchers early is not (usually) due to pitcher fatigue or pitcher injury risk, but rather because they're not as good the 3rd/4th time thru the lineup.  But I think I'd rather have our starters go from good to mediocre the 3rd time thru the lineup, versus trusting the crappy members of our bullpen with the ball.  Granted Akin had a bad game today and he had been pretty good, but we also tried to have Cionel get thru 2 innings and he gives up a leadoff triple.
    • Yeah, I'd like to see Hyde push the starters a bit more too. But if we see it, I think it'll be a pretty gradual ramp as the season goes on.  Seems like 90 pitches is the new 100, and unless the standings situation gets dire they're going to keep managing like the most important bullets are the ones saved for October. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...