Jump to content

Suggested Deal w/Marlins


Answerman

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, HakunaSakata said:

Worthless no, but not much more than a secondary piece in a trade. I also don't see how either would have any appeal to the Marlins. Kim Ng has already said that she anticipates the prospect they just traded Rojas for to be in the mix at some point this season and she's hinted that they might move Chisolm back to SS. Wendle and/or Berti are good enough fill ins for a month or so until Amaya is ready. 

Amaya is a younger version of Rojas, the player they traded to the Dodgers.  All glove no stick.   I doubt that he’s plan A at SS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I find it funny that you say it speculating too much and your next sentence is “they probably want..”

Im not speculating about anything. I’m saying this is exactly what has been reported. There have yet to be tied to any players with zero ML experience and outside of Casas, every player tied to them is an established Mler.

I keep  seeing you talk about what you would do and what they should do. Guess what, that doesn’t matter. What matters is what they want to do and reportedly, they want to do what I’m saying. 
 

You're criticizing someone and speaking like what you've read is the gospel. It's not.  It's also pure speculation. If we look at it from a logical standpoint the Marlins might "want" an Arraez or Mullins type, but if that's not realistic and they have to settle for a Kepler or Santander type I think they most certainly would prefer a MLB ready prospect. I mean, they literally just made a trade with a Marlins for a similar player (i..e, not proven, but expected to be called up this season). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would Miami want a low-OBP slugger whose fielding ability is rapidly declining? 

I wouldn't trade a young SP for Santander. That's just me. Good hitter, valuable to the O's lineup, but he's not exactly the profile of what modern baseball people are looking for. Plus they need a CF, not a COF/DH.

Edited by interloper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, HakunaSakata said:

As opposed to Mateo who (wait for it) is an older version and all glove no stick? 

Did I suggest the Marlins wanted Mateo?  Mateo is 27.  I guess some people might call that old.

Edited by RZNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, HakunaSakata said:

Do the Marlin's seem like they're a defensive minded player away from contention? Urias and Mateo are also old by baseball standards so there's really no reason to believe they have much more room for growth either. I'm not saying they're worthless players, I'm just saying that I can't imagine that two older players who basically came out of no where last season to have solid season largely driven by their defense really have much trade appeal outside of our organization. 

I don’t think the two should be overrated, but neither should they be underrated.   Urias didn’t really come out of nowhere, he’s been solid the whole time he’s been on the Orioles.  He’s hit a career OPS+ of 109, so his value does not come exclusively from defense.  Mateo’s admittedly does, but a great defensive SS is an asset. And I wouldn’t call either one of them old; Mateo will be 28 this season, Urias 29.   

Now, do I think either player by himself would fetch Lopez?  No.  And I think Urias would help the Marlins more than Mateo would given their needs.   
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, interloper said:

Why would Miami want a low-OBP slugger whose fielding ability is rapidly declining? 

I wouldn't trade a young SP for Santander. That's just me. Good hitter, valuable to the O's lineup, but he's not exactly the profile of what modern baseball people are looking for. Plus they need a CF, not a COF/DH.

Completely agree. They're already stuck with one of those types of players in Soler. If I were the Marlins the only players I would be interested in on the Orioles are Mullins and Cowser (as the main trade piece).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I don’t think the two should be overrated, but neither should they be underrated.   Urias didn’t really come out of nowhere, he’s been solid the whole time he’s been on the Orioles.  He’s hit a career OPS+ of 109, so his value does not come exclusively from defense.  Mateo’s admittedly does, but a great defensive SS is an asset. And I wouldn’t call either one of them old; Mateo will be 28 this season, Urias 29.   

Now, do I think either player by himself would fetch Lopez?  No.  And I think Urias would help the Marlins more than Mateo would given their needs.   
 

Teams on the verge of contending trade for 28/29 year old players. Teams that aren't do not. I really don't view the Marlins being even remotely close to contending. They arguably have the worst offense in baseball going into the season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, HakunaSakata said:

Teams on the verge of contending trade for 28/29 year old players. Teams that aren't do not. I really don't view the Marlins being even remotely close to contending. They arguably have the worst offense in baseball going into the season. 

That's fair, but there have certainly been reports that the Marlins want major league players for their arms.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, HakunaSakata said:

Respectfully disagree. Cowser + should be enough everyone except for Lopez and Alcantara. It might even be enough for Lopez, depending on how concerned the Marlins are about his second half collapse last season. 

Your overrating of Lopez is astounding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, HakunaSakata said:

Teams on the verge of contending trade for 28/29 year old players. Teams that aren't do not. I really don't view the Marlins being even remotely close to contending. They arguably have the worst offense in baseball going into the season. 

And, potentially, one of the best rotations, hence why they are looking to improve offense at key positions.   They signed Segura.  They were in on Jose Abreu.  Those are “now” moves.

Edited by RZNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, HakunaSakata said:

You're criticizing someone and speaking like what you've read is the gospel. It's not.  It's also pure speculation. If we look at it from a logical standpoint the Marlins might "want" an Arraez or Mullins type, but if that's not realistic and they have to settle for a Kepler or Santander type I think they most certainly would prefer a MLB ready prospect. I mean, they literally just made a trade with a Marlins for a similar player (i..e, not proven, but expected to be called up this season). 

Lol. You were the criticizing me. Stop being so sensitive.

Im basing things off of the knowledge we are being told. You are doing it on what you think they should do but I’m the one “speculating too much” lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Let's be honest, Gunnar ain't finishing second either.
    • Yeah, I don't think the Orioles' struggles against NL teams is very meaningful, but I do think the NL is stronger this year.  All the NL division leaders have looked formidable and steady throughout the season.  But also the Padres and Mets have kicked their seasons into another gear and have really impressed over the past couple of months.  Compare them to the Wild Card teams in the AL, and they just appear more formidable on paper.   Also the DBacks are pretty much outhitting everyone right now -- though that's been offset by their not so effective pitching.  
    • For sure he is out of consideration as the MVP favorite to copy Cal.  Of course,  Cal didn't have an Aaron Judge to compete with.  The runner-up in MVP voting in 1983 was a guy named Eddie Murray.  Eddie had more HR, more RBI, a higher slugging and OPS than Cal, but Cal had a higher WAR and batting average (.318 to .303).  I wonder if Eddie is bitter about losing the MVP to Cal?  A case could be made for either one. 
    • Going to lookup splits before/after AS break for 2024, but my gut tells me the O’s faltered against the NL Central division the last two years. Let’s see how October plays out!
    • I've heard folks I trust a lot here report on him as being good but on a gut level those plays bugged me too. I think Holliday is sufficient alone as a 5th infielder as a playoff roster gets configured, and believe in series you get injury replacements if Urias re-rolls the ankle or Gunnar breaks somebody else's arm.    Rivera and Soto are kind of both about that speed. From comments we know Urias, Westburg, Mountcastle the probable return order, but TBD on the Rivera, Soto, Eloy departures.    I think there's some value to Coby Mayo staying around even if he just watches ala '70 Grich "did not play in series".
    • He missed a cycle by inches on one of the doubles.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...