Jump to content

Bowden: expansion is inevitable..and so is realignment?


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, oriole said:

It’d be a lot cooler if every team played each other an even amount of times and then every year the divisions are made to reflect the spending power of that team. So divisions with teams with unlimited resources only have one league leader and the rest in that division have to be okay with potential wild card spots. Then teams that don’t spend so much have a chance. Maybe it’s just me but Yankees and Dodgers every single year is just boring and more detrimental to the sport overall than having a handful of behemoth. 
 

I’m aware that it’ll never happen because the logistics would be a nightmare and a lot of teams would find more reason to spend less money, not more…so the players association would never agree to it. But maybe couple it with a complete removal of the salary cap so that the Yankees and Dodgers can each have $600 million pay roll or whatever but the playing field is evened out with a balanced schedule and then in the end they are only really competing against other financial juggernauts to get a good spot in the playoffs. 
 

Probably more trouble than it’s worth, but the “balanced schedule” is a half-measure when you still have to win more games than the others in your division who have the ability to sign stupid contracts and then eat the contract when the player stops being productive. The O’s still won’t be able to win more games than the Yankees unless it’s a fluke because one team will spend money and the other won’t. 

See I wouldn't even have divisions, just two leagues, American League and National League, or maybe I would even get rid of them. Play everyone equally, best 8 or 12 or whatever teams advance to the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, interloper said:

Why not? It's kind of good for everyone if they're just battling each other in one division instead of spreading their dominance out across multiple divisions. At least that's how I see it. Put em in a division and let em try to out spend each other like goons. 

I like it better, as a fan of a small market team. I doubt MLB as a whole likes it better, because they make more money when all of those teams are in the playoffs. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NJOriolesFan said:

I think I would make a couple of changes.  I think Toronto should go to the East (Northeast) Division.  Then Pittsburgh should go to the North Division.  Philadelphia should then be in the mid-Atlantic.  I think I could be convinced to swap the Charlotte and Nashville expansion teams.  Although it may work better if it was Charlotte/Nashville/Louisville in the mid-atlantic and New Orleans in the Southeast.

The other divisions, I suppose would be:

Chicago White Sox, Chicago Cubs, St Louis Cardinals, Milwaukee Brewers

Kansas City Royals, Houston Astros, Texas Rangers, Minnesota Twins

Seattle Mariners, Colorado Rockies, {Las Vegas} Athletics, San Francisco Giants

Los Angeles Dodgers, San Diego Padres, Anaheim Angels, Arizona Diamondbacks

 

I would go:

Chicago White Sox, Chicago Cubs, Minnesota Twins, Milwaukee Brewers

Kansas City Royals, Houston Astros, Texas Rangers, St Louis Cardinals

Seattle Mariners, Colorado Rockies, Los Angeles Dodgers, San Francisco Giants

San Diego Padres, Anaheim Angels, Arizona Diamondbacks, {Las Vegas} Athletics

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, NJOriolesFan said:

I think I would make a couple of changes.  I think Toronto should go to the East (Northeast) Division.  Then Pittsburgh should go to the North Division.  Philadelphia should then be in the mid-Atlantic.  I think I could be convinced to swap the Charlotte and Nashville expansion teams.  Although it may work better if it was Charlotte/Nashville/Louisville in the mid-atlantic and New Orleans in the Southeast.

The other divisions, I suppose would be:

Chicago White Sox, Chicago Cubs, St Louis Cardinals, Milwaukee Brewers

Kansas City Royals, Houston Astros, Texas Rangers, Minnesota Twins

Seattle Mariners, Colorado Rockies, {Las Vegas} Athletics, San Francisco Giants

Los Angeles Dodgers, San Diego Padres, Anaheim Angels, Arizona Diamondbacks

 

I suspect each team in LA, Chicago and NY would insist on not being in the same division as the other team in its market for brand identity (and consequently financial) reasons.  That would guarantee that two leagues would remain in existence.  That would probably also mean that DC and Baltimore would remain in separate leagues which is fine with me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Would you guys care if they got rid of “American” and “National” league?

With interleague play, uniformity with the DH, umpires, etc. there's really no difference between the leagues like the old days when there were differences and the AL tended to be sluggers and the NL tended to have more speed players (and bigger astro turf fields), there's not really a difference anymore.   It would not bother me although it sounds sacrilegious. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, yark14 said:

Bring back the Expos.

Have an expansion team in Austin and schedule the Orioles to play in Austin 20-30 games a year.

That's all I'd like to see.

After 30+ years in Austin, I just returned to Baltimore.  Which pretty much makes this a lock to come true!

I really don't think MLB would play that well in Austin.  There are lots and lots of ways for folks there to dispose of their entertainment dollars.  And anyone in ATX with lots of dough tends to spend July and August somewhere else.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

I agree, it would be great for us, but baseball wants those big payroll teams to make the playoffs.

As much as the NFL gets it wrong their revenue sharing model gives every team a chance to compete on the same level. If the NFL was like MLB, Patrick Mahomes would be playing for a big market team like the Rams by now leaving the Chiefs to rebuild with a rookie or journey man quarterback.

I get MLB is different with local television contracts, but fans aren't going to watch the Yankees play intra-squad games 162 times. There has to be other teams for them to compete against. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

As much as the NFL gets it wrong their revenue sharing model gives every team a chance to compete on the same level. If the NFL was like MLB, Patrick Mahomes would be playing for a big market team like the Rams by now leaving the Chiefs to rebuild with a rookie or journey man quarterback.

I get MLB is different with local television contracts, but fans aren't going to watch the Yankees play intra-squad games 162 times. There has to be other teams for them to compete against. 

I think this disparity will lead to more harm with further expansion and dilution of the traditions of the game.  I think failing to level the field is the biggest hindrance to the game today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Would you guys care if they got rid of “American” and “National” league?

Well, I still think there is room for two leagues though they could move the teams around and I wouldn't care. My preference is still to have two leagues with a balance schedule within the leagues themselves. Interleague can still continue, but should be no more than one three game series against one Division that would change each year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Outside of any of the "snubs" losing out of any potential bonuses, I don't care. I'd almost rather see them getting a solid break mid season anyways. 
    • I think there is a better term than "angry" to describe some of the O's. Anger seldom results in anything positive. Now, playing with attitude is another thing. GH is certainly the "King" of attitude on this team, no one is going to beat him. I believe there are several position players that show attitude in different ways. Pitchers?? SP throw 90 or so pitches. They can't afford to display emotions or they would be worn out much earlier. They also can't afford to have the "deer in the headlights" look. Of the O's starters, I believe CP is in that world at present. It's mainly an experience and growth thing.  GR, IMO, has approved significantly in that department over the last year. 
    • On close examination of Kjerstad today (July 7), I hope he is not part of any trade package. This kid is a bull, with power potential that is off the charts.  He runs surprisingly well and that throw to the plate from left was very impressive, if a bit high. I can see him planted in left field for a long time, perhaps in a platoon with Hays the rest of the year, but eventually full time if he proves able to hit southpaws.
    • I like this idea better, but I am curious to what it would take to secure Mason Miller.
    • I totally get it.  It’s a huge risk vs. reward situation, but getting someone like him (if he’s still strong) or Skubal could make a major difference come October for you guys over the next three seasons.
    • IMHO it's not about whether Crochet is an "opener" or a reliever, it's the innings.  He's never thrown more than 65 innings (at college in 2019) in his entire college or pro career and stands at 105.1 today.  Let that sink in.  On top of that, there is Crochet's TJ surgery, where he missed all of 2022 and had multiple stints on the IL in 2023 as he was recovering, tossing a total of 25 IP. Does any of this mean he cannot throw double (130 IP) or triple (195 IP) his prior max?  No one can say for certain, but I'd think any reasonable person would agree that, at the very least, it's a far riskier proposition for someone like Crochet than a pitcher who has been a starter and has thrown 150+ IP before.  So, to recap: The most innings he's ever thrown was 65 IP in college (2019) After throwing 54 innings of relief for the White Sox in 2021, he missed all of 2022 with Tommy John surgery He followed up in 2023 by throwing a total of 25 innings of relief, as he dealt with a couple of IL stints recovering from TJ His first ever pro start came this season and he's been dynamite through 105.1 IP Elias and Sig are well aware of the risks and it will be interesting to see how it all shakes out.
    • Gunnar doing a good job of hitting the ball to all fields.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...