Jump to content

The 2023 Bullpen Thread


sportsfan8703

Recommended Posts

The bullpen ERA is at 3.56, which is 10th in the AL but .41 better than league average.   Looking around the league, there are 11 teams doing respectable or better (sub-4.00), but then you’ve got four disaster bullpens: Detroit 5.46, KC 5.67, Oakland 5.88, Chicago 7.57.   We certainly saw last week how craptastic the A’s and White Sox bullpens are.  

Ours hasn’t been all sunshine and roses, but then they’re being asked to cover at least 4 innings pretty much every night.  Our pen will look better if the starters get deeper into games.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

The bullpen ERA is at 3.56, which is 10th in the AL but .41 better than league average.   Looking around the league, there are 11 teams doing respectable or better (sub-4.00), but then you’ve got four disaster bullpens: Detroit 5.46, KC 5.67, Oakland 5.88, Chicago 7.57.   We certainly saw last week how craptastic the A’s and White Sox bullpens are.  

Ours hasn’t been all sunshine and roses, but then they’re being asked to cover at least 4 innings pretty much every night.  Our pen will look better if the starters get deeper into games.  
 

The Orioles certainly impacted both Oakland and Chicago's numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Frobby said:

Ours hasn’t been all sunshine and roses, but then they’re being asked to cover at least 4 innings pretty much every night.  Our pen will look better if the starters get deeper into games.  
 

I was just reading an article that showed data of how modern day pitchers are having more injuries and Tommy John surguries than ever before. The author was showing data that suggested that the babying of modern day starting pitchers, and giving them low pitch count limits, has actually backfired more than it helped. The article made the claim that the old days of letting pitchers go into the 7th inning and pitching well beyond 100 pitches was actually better for them (and their teams), because of the same concept of how if you make a bullpen pitcher warm up in the bullpen, then you don't want to not use him because not using him after a warm up can cause stress on their arm.  Basically it said that it helps the muscles if they actually get used once being warmed up, instead of shutting them down before maximum stamina.

 

All this is to say that I hate today's weakling mentality of thinking you have to pull a starting pitcher after 70-90 some pitches. It doesn't make any sense to me unless the opposing hitters have shown they've figured the pitcher out on that day. If a pitcher is rolling along, I think that pitcher should be given the opportunity to pitch deeper into the game until the opposing hitters prove they can handle him.

I think starting pitchers should stop getting babied so much. Pitch count limits should be closer to 130. Not 90.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

I was just reading an article that showed data of how modern day pitchers are having more injuries and Tommy John surguries than ever before. The author was showing data that suggested that the babying of modern day starting pitchers, and giving them low pitch count limits, has actually backfired more than it helped.

 

Got a link?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And even then, I think pitch counts are arbitrary and should not be the end all be all of a managers decision. It should be farther down the list of things to consider when thinking about making a pitching change. The game flow and anticipating the opponents lineup should be the top things to think about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the goalpost has moved a fair bit since that 2013 article.    In 2013 Jeremy Guthrie faced more batters than Sandy Alcantara did in 2022, and no one would let Jeremy Guthrie do that today.

I guess maybe OAK would let Cole Irvin, or 2022 BAL would have let Jordan Lyles if he didn't tucker out.

The state of the art happening before our eyes is part of what's fascinating to me watching BAL's handling of one Grayson Rodriguez.

Pretty sure the Rays are content focusing on building up team-first culture and except for a few important pitchers letting Arm Barners slag their arms 40 IP/season until they hit Arb.     You can't argue with the run prevention or $$$/WAR results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/14/2023 at 10:39 PM, RZNJ said:

The Mike Baumann I saw tonight could be a good setup man.  He’s had some good outings but tonight he actually had a really good curveball to go along with the 95-96 mph fastball.   Crossed fingers.

One appearance means little but I know that Cano has the stuff.  Crossed fingers on both of these guys.

And Cano and Baumann continue to get higher leverage situations.  Right now Hyde seems to place his trust in.

1. Bautista

2. Cano

3. Baker

4. Coulombe

5. Baumann

6. The rest.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Baumann could be a nice piece in the bullpen for the rest of the season. His stuff obviously plays up, and his ability to go 2 innings is really useful.

I also like Cano. It was obvious when Elias traded for him that the front office liked Cano's stuff and peripherals, and thought they could help him fix his control issues.

I trust Baker because his stuff is so good. He'll have an occasional hiccup every so often, but he's firmly in my circle of trust.

Once Givens and Tate come back, I actually think we'll be in good shape. And that's even with the possibility Tate's injury could be a long-term thing. I think just one of Baumann or Cano emerging and Givens returning gives us a nice bullpen. If both Baumann and Cano can be reliable middle (more so Baumann) and late (more so Cano) inning options, that would be some quality depth.

If Cionel Perez has reverted back to a pumpkin, then perhaps DL Hall becomes an option later in the season.

I'm fairly bullish on the pen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bullpen appears to be coming together

Bautista, Perez, Cano, Baker, Columbe, Akin, Baumann, Voth

Givens should be out on a rehab assignment soon.  Tate is still a month out it seems.  Hall could be a factor.  We've been riding Perez hard this season.  Hopefully, some these off days have freshened him up.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I thought Chisholm missed home too. They didn’t appeal tho I don’t think.
    • Now run scores and Yanks take lead. 
    • Inexcusable missed call in NY. Review Cleo at showed Chisholm out at 2nd. They upheld safe call. 
    • Well, good on posters who proved the SSS side of "Guards Ball." I just found it striking in terms of the narrative in that article, which was basically the same as what most around here were complaining the O's lacked: clutch hitting, passing the baton, aggressive running, getting runners in from third, etc. I guess the real bottom line is "whatever works." Which of course varies from case to case. The old Bill James postseason wisdom was that HRs are the ticket, since you face good pitching and get so few hits. So back to you, Elias, keep crunching those numbers...
    • First, the had a jump in 23’ given how terrible they had been previously, which conditions many fans in the marketplace not to care. They simple weren’t relevant for years. So one very good regular season will not undue years of being bad/irrelevant and treating your customers terribly. Next, I think they missed an opportunity in the offseason by not doing enough by way of big/bold attention grabbing moves. Now I acknowledge that this was most likely due to the ownership flux/transition. I believe they got an attendance/marketplace engagement boost when they changed owners and when they traded for Burnes. However, I believe we would have seen more engagement attendance with say a big Gunnar extension and/or bringing in a big time FA.   IMO this would have created more buzz before the season (say around the time people make season tix decisions - IMO before Christmas is when some people make those bigger purchases). All of this is to say, that it will take time and effort on the organizations part because of how bad of a stain that the Angeloses left. I still have friends and colleagues who refuse to support the Orioles and attend games due to the damage that was done. Rubenstien & co are not going to be able to undo 30 years of awfulness overnight. But IMO it is not enough to simply call it “a new chapter”. They have to make new/different actions to distinguish themselves from who the Orioles were/used to be under the Angelos regime.
    • Just checking in on Gameday, Yankees looking incredibly vulnerable.  Should be the Os out there.  Super lame.  Whichever team wins this series I hope gets knocked out by CLE or DET.
    • If the franchise were better, the fan base would be too.  It’s been a rough 40 years.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...