Jump to content

Ryan McKenna 2023


OsFanSinceThe80s

Recommended Posts

On 4/3/2023 at 5:52 PM, Spy Fox said:

Don't you know? The best way to run a healthy team-oriented business is to make sure your employees know that one mistake results in immediate termination. 

I used to freelance with CBS News (decades ago) and the producers enjoyed repeatedly warning me, "We have a motto here: Never make the same mistake once." That had a way of sinking in.

 

God Bless Bob Simon (1941-2015).

Edited by LA2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was watching the MLB channel the other day and Harold Reynolds brought up the possibility that Gunnar Henderson running out towards the ball, while McKenna was running in, could have had Ryan wondering if Gunnar was still coming towards him. With that short outfield.. who knows?

The game isn't always won or lost in the 9th inning..  and a 3 game series isn't always won or lost in the 3rd game. The outfield sucked that series. 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
On 4/27/2023 at 9:24 AM, sportsfan8703 said:

Kudos to McKenna bouncing back from “the drop”. He’s got his OPS up to almost .700. He’s looked good in the field and has had some big hits as well. 

And now, his OPS is up to .795, and .857 vs. LHP.  It’s a microscopic sample size, as his OPS was under .500 as of April 25.   Amazing what four good games will do when you don’t get that many at bats to begin with.  

Let’s say the O’s go on a 10-year rampage where they go something like 929-691.   Someone will still be saying, “it could have been 930-690 if McKenna hadn’t dropped that fly ball in Boston!”
 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

And now, his OPS is up to .795, and .857 vs. LHP.  It’s a microscopic sample size, as his OPS was under .500 as of April 25.   Amazing what four good games will do when you don’t get that many at bats to begin with.  

Let’s say the O’s go on a 10-year rampage where they go something like 929-691.   Someone will still be saying, “it could have been 930-690 if McKenna hadn’t dropped that fly ball in Boston!”
 

I don't know how this will go away. Whenever I look at the standings, I always think we should have 1 more win and 1 less loss. Unless we have a comfortable playoff spot, I think I will keep doing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, spleen1015 said:

I don't know how this will go away. Whenever I look at the standings, I always think we should have 1 more win and 1 less loss. Unless we have a comfortable playoff spot, I think I will keep doing it.

If it weren’t for his 2 run HR and 3 RBI we would’ve lost yesterday after having a big lead. Consider his debt repaid and let it go. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, waroriole said:

If it weren’t for his 2 run HR and 3 RBI we would’ve lost yesterday after having a big lead. Consider his debt repaid and let it go. 

I hear ya, but my brain says that's what he's supposed to do. He's not supposed to drop flyballs that lose games.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Frobby said:

And now, his OPS is up to .795, and .857 vs. LHP.  It’s a microscopic sample size, as his OPS was under .500 as of April 25.   Amazing what four good games will do when you don’t get that many at bats to begin with.  

Let’s say the O’s go on a 10-year rampage where they go something like 929-691.   Someone will still be saying, “it could have been 930-690 if McKenna hadn’t dropped that fly ball in Boston!”
 

Build a million bridges.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, spleen1015 said:

I hear ya, but my brain says that's what he's supposed to do. He's not supposed to drop flyballs that lose games.

Mateo just made a terrible error on a potential double play ball. The out probability on that play probably isn't the 99% of McKenna's ball but it's close. The main difference is that we ended up winning the game despite Mateo's error. I don't see a pattern in McKenna's case, the question is whether he provides enough overall value. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McKenna deserves a bit of respect from last night’s game. He made a couple solid plays in left (even though I cringe every time he one-hands catch that doesn’t land squarely in the webbing), and that drag bunt single directly after the Mullins no-doubt homer was a great idea. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quietly hitting .294. Only 34 AB of course, but he's contributing. Could have spiraled on him after the dropped pop-up, but he bounced back nicely. I don't always like the McKenna Pinch Hit, a Hyde staple, but he's got a good role on this team. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I may be misunderstanding, but if you are suggesting that you would recall Rogers for the playoffs, then I must respectfully and strongly disagree. Baker is odd man out here, or maybe Smith, but I would definitely keep Bowman
    • A litmus test is if you'd prefer Trevor Rogers back for last guy. Tell me if it sounds crazy, but a pitcher you can sign to a minor league deal in mid-August might not be competitive with the world's greatest hitters in late September. It is fun to curate a trick pitch that works for a minute.
    • Just read two interesting tidbits - Juan Soto has battered him something like 18/35 which seemed like a lot but I guess PHI and WSN saw each other a bunch in the NL East. Also that he passed 1000 career innings.   It caught me a little by surprise he has been around that long.    Fingers crossed Bradish and Grayson in their careers can get there.    Eflin is 3rd among pitchers at age 30 and down this season. Hopping to Active Leaders to see how few pitchers attain that in this Driveline/Arm Barn era, tonight he became the 57th active pitcher to get there.     He gives us the ~162 IP we hope for in 2025, it'd go up about 20 spots.
    • Westburg, Urias, Mountcastle… Good defense, even when there’s bad defense. Westburg missed a ball that went for a hit, but I didn’t feel any foreboding, no,”here we go again” because I felt sure that that one play wouldn’t ruin the game. And it didn’t. Good pitching, even when there’s bad pitching. Eflin had never in his whole career walked 5 guys, but I wasn’t worried, for some reason. Even when Bowman had his worst outing as an oriole, I wasn’t worried, no,”here we go again” because I felt sure we’d win. And we did. Good hitting, good base running, even when Santander REALLY wanted that triple… and didn’t get it.  The fundamental baseball smarts seem to have returned, so a mistake is just a mistake. I feel really good about this team now, even though they haven’t been perfect. I really feel they’ll cover for each other, and we will enter the playoffs strong. I feel most comfortable about facing the Yankees again; they just don’t seem like a strong team, and I’m not the least bit worried about facing them again.
    • That is strong language coming from you.  The only recent guy I really couldn’t stand was Jimenez, though I sure wasn’t keen on Kimbrel for most of the season either.
    • Did you really say tonight’s game didn’t mean much? 
    • To state the obvious, the magic number for home field in the WC series is now 1, with 4 games remaining.   Would love to v close that out tomorrow va. the Yankees and then relax all weekend.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...