Jump to content

Very, very way too early thoughts


eddie83

Recommended Posts

What’s frustrating is this is an example that I’m sure the front office could point to and say “see, they’re not ready” but if they had invested in some actual pitching then we might be looking at a better opening weekend.

Anyways, not gonna kill us to start the season 1-2. I still think they finish around .500 when all is said and done 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This team looks a lot like the team that crumbled in September and October last year, and not at all like the team that rolled through June, July and August. These three games were very reminiscent to the Jays and Red Sox games end of last year where we couldnt get anyone out. Not sure what is up with the defense. That was solid all year last year. Definitely concerning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Baker looked much better today.

Baumann is going to take some patience like Baker did last year.   
 

I thought Irvin looked good.   He left too many curves up to lefties but I think he’s going to be good.

Super sloppy defense in this series.  It won’t continue.

I was worried about two dead spots in the lineup with Mateo and Frazier.   Maybe not.

I voted this team for 79-82 wins but I like what I see so far.   It comes down to the starting pitching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Way too early to have any meaningful thoughts. I didn’t expect the pitching to be great but I also didn’t see this defense being this pathetic. 

So you’re thoughts on the defense are pretty meaningless,right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm... so admittedly I'm behind on the thoughts here generally about the team this year, but.... man, we have two people here predicting this is a .500 team in 2023 when the O's were supposed to be, under Elias's grand plan, ready to start seriously competing for a deep playoff run and maybe even a championship. This seems to indicate the plan hasn't gone so well, but I know how passionate people are and how "up-and-down" the emotions can be, but is this an accurate gauge on how people generally feel about this team right now? In 2023, we're still not expecting better than a .500 team? Perhaps this is just frustration due to the rough start?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, oriole said:

What’s frustrating is this is an example that I’m sure the front office could point to and say “see, they’re not ready” but if they had invested in some actual pitching then we might be looking at a better opening weekend.

Anyways, not gonna kill us to start the season 1-2. I still think they finish around .500 when all is said and done 

Well, as long as we're talking "way too early," I was updating the game thread with the performance of three free agent guys that people had talked about maybe signing to upgrade the pitching.

Ross Stripling vs. Yankees: 5.0 IP 6 H 4 ER 3 HR 2 BB 3 K

Jameson Taillon vs. Brewers: 4.0 IP 7 H 3 ER 0 HR 1 BB 2 K

Chris Bassitt vs. Cardinals: 3.1 IP 10 H 9 ER 4 HR 0 BB 0 K

The most expensive guy made Gibson and Irvin look like Maddux and Smoltz. Taijuan Walker was also available, andhe goes tomorrow against the Yankees, so we'll see how he looks.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sessh said:

Hmm... so admittedly I'm behind on the thoughts here generally about the team this year, but.... man, we have two people here predicting this is a .500 team in 2023 when the O's were supposed to be, under Elias's grand plan, ready to start seriously competing for a deep playoff run and maybe even a championship. This seems to indicate the plan hasn't gone so well, but I know how passionate people are and how "up-and-down" the emotions can be, but is this an accurate gauge on how people generally feel about this team right now? In 2023, we're still not expecting better than a .500 team? Perhaps this is just frustration due to the rough start?

It's only year five.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The games in April count as much in the standings as the games in Sept. so pointing out  that this is a rotten team is appropriate if that is the fact, which IMO, it is.  Can they improve as the season wears on, of course.  But we  all know the AL East in an unforgiving Division.  Not adding impact players, yes plural, already shows.  I hope they improve as the season goes by, but I do not see facts that would support that statement.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I've made it clear that if they don't sign Santa and Burnes I'm ok with it as long as the money is allocated to other players they feel that fits their profile better .You know you have people on here like SG who only hears what he wants to hear. I need to learn to ignore that guy. 
    • Oh mr know it all. Who most times is wrong. Lol
    • I also think Santander will age better than Trumbo, despite my repeated comparisons of the two players. But I don't know that he will age better than Trumbo and all of the other one dimensional sluggers who were enjoying the retired millionaire sports star lifestyle by their mid-30s, and I don't want the Orioles to be on the hook when the world finds out in 2 or 3 years. Re-signing Santander to a 4 year, $80 million dollar deal is something the DD/PA regime would have done. Hopefully the ME/DR regime is smarter than that (and I think they are). 22nd percentile is really bad, man. And it's unlikely to improve in his 30s.
    • Looks like Baseball Fandom was at the game today!
    • But that is not what you said. You said he’s a bad fielder, just not quite Trumbo-tier. Thus, you were stating he is close to as bad a fielder as Trumbo was, which is not correct. Generally speaking, no player makes up the loss of offensive value with defensive value as the age. It is usually one of the first things to go. I was not making any sort of argument that he was going to make up declining offense with defense, just pointing out that you made a preposterous statement.
    • At least relative to the rest of the league Santander has an interesting profile because he is comfortably above-average at making contact; his whiff rates are much better than Trumbo's so he's not really as much of a TTO player as you would think.  This gives him hope that he will age a little bit better than someone like Trumbo.  Though he's still got a good shot of being out of the league in 3 years.
    • It's not the money, it's the years.  I wouldn't mind signing him for a year or two, even at what I'd consider to be stupid money.  But what I DON'T agree with is signing him for any more than 2-3 years as I don't think he's going to age well.  And I expect him to get more than 3 years from someone, so I'm a hard pass.  Can we afford him?  Money wise, sure.  But I don't want to see us stuck with him 4-5 years down the road when his skillset has greatly diminished, but he's still playing every day because we owe him a lot of money and a lot of loyalty.  Let some other club take that risk, get the QO pick and move on.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...