Jump to content

2026 Orioles


Yossarian

Recommended Posts

I'm enjoying watching this 2023 version of the Orioles and I think the window for big things is beginning to open this season.

Having said that, I can't help but think how different this team will look in 2026.  Is it possible that the only position players that have played at all this year that will be on the 2026 Orioles roster are Rutschman, Ortiz, and Henderson?  

The brains of the organization have some very difficult decisions to make in the coming years.   I hope they are up to the task.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Yossarian said:

I'm enjoying watching this 2023 version of the Orioles and I think the window for big things is beginning to open this season.

Having said that, I can't help but think how different this team will look in 2026.  Is it possible that the only position players that have played at all this year that will be on the 2026 Orioles roster are Rutschman, Ortiz, and Henderson?  

The brains of the organization have some very difficult decisions to make in the coming years.   I hope they are up to the task.

I wouldn't even bet on Rutschman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Yossarian said:

You're thinking the O's fully adopt the Rays model of no long- term, legacy players and full roster turnover every three years, or so?

What are you talking about?

Rays extend young players.

I'm worried that ownership will continue to shy away from multi-year deals and will flip Aldey with two years of control remaining to get the best return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm more of a '27 Orioles dreamer.    That year has a certain in-century cache for trying to run up the ELO curve as far as a baseball team can.

I do believe Holliday mostly sets things up for the team to be a year better each time throughout the remainder of Adley's years here.

There's a fair chance Adley's prime is right now, but all the ferocious ones in his orbit are just cutting their teeth, if even that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

There's a fair chance Adley's prime is right now, but all the ferocious ones in his orbit are just cutting their teeth, if even that.

Wow, how quickly things change in Baseball land. A month ago Rutschman and Henderson were our Trout and Ohtani, now they're Wieters and Markakis (i.e., mere mortals).

Edited by now
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ShoelesJoe said:

Holliday SS

Rutschman C

Cowser CF

Basallo DH

Henderson 3B

Mayo RF

Kjerstad 1B

Westburg 2B

Beavers LF

 

 

With that lineup, who needs pitching? :)

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

What are you talking about?

Rays extend young players.

I'm worried that ownership will continue to shy away from multi-year deals and will flip Aldey with two years of control remaining to get the best return.

You are correct about the Rays - they do have Wander Franco on an 11-year deal (we'll see if they hold on to him that long). They do have two others under contract pay 2025 -  Jeffrey Springs and Pete Fairbanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, ShoelesJoe said:

Holliday SS

Rutschman C

Cowser CF

Basallo DH

Henderson 3B

Mayo RF

Kjerstad 1B

Westburg 2B

Beavers LF

 

That’s a whole lot of LH bats in our future lineup. 

 

This assumes guys like Norby, Wagner. Willem, Lester don't make the bigs (at least for the Orioles) and Stowers and Ortiz are dealt?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Yossarian said:

This assumes guys like Norby, Wagner. Willem, Lester don't make the bigs (at least for the Orioles) and Stowers and Ortiz are dealt?

Yes. Unless MLB figures out a way to add five new positions on a diamond I don't see how we keep everybody. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
    • I miss the "Throwin' Swannanoan".......  
    • So what do the Rays do?   Spend a lot of money fixing the roof for the few remaining years that ballpark has left?   Or do like the A's and play in a minor league facility until their new ballpark is built? I wonder if they could work out something with the Yankees to play in Steinbrenner Field.   It is in Tampa and one of the nicer spring training facilities on the Gulf Coast.   The Rays train in Port Charlotte which is (50???) miles south and I don't think the facility is nearly as good.   Steinbrenner FIeld seats over 10K, has luxury boxes, and a very accessible location for Tampa area fans.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...