Jump to content

Gunnar Henderson's Career Start Compared to Cal Ripken Jr's


Billy F-Face3

Recommended Posts

I like this thread as with Ohtani helpfully gone, Gunnar gets ready to try for the Rookie to MVP leap.    The current register of Player Seasons by Orioles Bats age 23 and younger (zero Adley Rutschman returns) still neatly fits on one Fangraphs screen with just 29 occurrences, before Gunnar and Holliday and Mayo and Basallo push it >30 these next few years.

https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders/major-league?pos=all&stats=bat&lg=all&qual=y&type=c%2C4%2C6%2C11%2C12%2C13%2C21%2C-1%2C34%2C35%2C40%2C41%2C-1%2C23%2C37%2C38%2C50%2C317%2C61%2C-1%2C111%2C-1%2C203%2C199%2C58%2C3&ind=1&team=2&startdate=&enddate=&season1=1954&season=2023&v_cr=202301&sortcol=22&sortdir=default&age=14%2C23

fWAR pegs '82 Cal and '23 Gunnar 4.6 on the dot.      Wow does Cal's 27th place finish in his 1984 MVP defense look absurd.

I had a chuckle that the youngest Oriole graced with a full-time job at that young of an age who was a little bit overwhelmed by it was Billy Ripken.    I'm sure that was a complete coincidence.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Cause WAR wasn't a thing then.  

 

1 hour ago, spleen1015 said:

I had to go look this up.

1984 AL MVP Voting

1984 Leaders sorted by fWAR

How is this even possible? Cal was abolutely robbed.

Relief pitcher threw 140 very solid innings for the runaway best team in baseball.  Hoss pitched in 80 games.  Had a WHIP under one, ERA under 2 ERA+ of 204.

It's silly that Cal was that low but I can the 1984 logic of it.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

 

Relief pitcher threw 140 very solid innings for the runaway best team in baseball.  Hoss pitched in 80 games.  Had a WHIP under one, ERA under 2 ERA+ of 204.

It's silly that Cal was that low but I can the 1984 logic of it.

No drop off from Cal or Eddie in 1984, it was pretty much everyone else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

 

Relief pitcher threw 140 very solid innings for the runaway best team in baseball.  Hoss pitched in 80 games.  Had a WHIP under one, ERA under 2 ERA+ of 204.

It's silly that Cal was that low but I can the 1984 logic of it.

 

Hernandez wasn't as ludicrous a choice as might appear at first glance. He had an 8.7 WPA, which is the 10th-highest total of all time, and the highest of any reliever in history.

But the rest of the ballot reflected the fact that nobody had any consistent, logical way to combine or compare different types of production. Kent Hrbek finished 2nd? In what universe is a first baseman with 27 homers who was like 8th in the league in RBI on an 81-81 team the 2nd-best player in the league? Eddie was also a first baseman on a .500-ish team, but had more homers, RBI, walks, runs, steals.

Cal's value was so, so high in part because of otherworldly defensive metrics which were unavailable then. Nevertheless, Cal hit about as well as Hrbek, while being a GG-caliber shortstop, on a team that won four more games, but Hrbek beat Cal in MVP vote points 247-1. Steve Balboni, an overweight DH/1B with 77 RBI in 126 games, got more MVP votes than Cal.

Sometimes you just can't justify old award votes, because they were a few hundred writers subjectively making stuff up as they went.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

 

Relief pitcher threw 140 very solid innings for the runaway best team in baseball.  Hoss pitched in 80 games.  Had a WHIP under one, ERA under 2 ERA+ of 204.

It's silly that Cal was that low but I can the 1984 logic of it.

He also was ridiculously unbeatable. I remember that year and there was a feeling of futility when he came into the game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/11/2024 at 9:34 AM, BRobinsonfan said:

This is one of those posts that just didn't age well.  

That post is a microcosm for what a significant number of fans were saying at the time, which is what inspired me to create this thread in the first place. It's like the Orioles Bench Coach, Freddi Gonzalez, said back then: "I think people are going to have to be patient." 

We see now that the patience has paid off and rewarded with a Rookie of The Year season.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/10/2024 at 10:45 PM, OriolesMagic83 said:

No drop off from Cal or Eddie in 1984, it was pretty much everyone else. 

The 1983 Orioles were an old team and for many of the core players who had been with the team since the mid 70's it was their last season of being a useful player.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

That post is a microcosm for what a significant number of fans were saying at the time, which is what inspired me to create this thread in the first place. It's like the Orioles Bench Coach, Freddi Gonzalez, said back then: "I think people are going to have to be patient." 

We see now that the patience has paid off and rewarded with a Rookie of The Year season.

Work kept me offline most of last season, so this was a really fun thread to catch up on and read all of the way through. Comparing reactions people initially had to the first post, and then the reactions as Gunnar picked up the pace. The funny part is, from my fandom corner, I was one who was worried Henderson wasn’t quite ready for the Bigs. Glad I missed out on disagreeing with your initial post!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/11/2024 at 9:34 AM, BRobinsonfan said:

This is one of those posts that just didn't age well.  

Not surprising, considering that post was coming from one of the board's biggest trolls. He's the king of horrible one-sentence takes. His ratio of incorrect and inflammatory opinions per typed words in posts is atronomical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bpilktree said:

I saw Gunnar just announced he got engaged today from the other day.  So congrats to him and future Mrs. Henderson 

Indeed. Congratulations to the future Mr. and Mrs Gunnar Henderson.

He joins Jackson Holliday in doing the same for his high school sweetheart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...