Jump to content

Hicks > McKenna


Frobby

Recommended Posts

I don’t know how long Aaron Hicks will play as welL as he’s played over the week he’s been on the team, but I’ve seen enough of him to decide I like him as a 4th/5th OF more than I like McKenna.  He shows decent speed and good instincts in the OF, he’s got a good eye at the plate, and he has decent pop.  When Mullins is ready to return, I’d favor keeping Hicks and optioning McKenna.  

I realize there’s a whole separate discussion about whether and when to call up Colton Cowser.   I’m leaving that issue to the side for now.  For me, the simple equation here is Hicks > McKenna.  
 

 

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. And there's an entirely separate discussion about what to do with McKenna at Norfolk so he's not taking any time away from key prospects like Kjerstad, Hudson, and Cowser. I feel like I'm missing one other. But I should probably throw John Rhodes into that list because he's been smashing bombs at Bowie and I can imagine he's forcing his name to come up in discussions about potential promotions (to Norfolk).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, NCRaven said:

I’d keep both.  Righty-Lefty.  Send Lester out.

Hicks is a switch-hitter. Career: .704 vs. RHP; .741 vs. LHP. More walks and power batting right-handed.

Edited by LA2
right-handed, not "left-handed"
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Switch-hitting Aaron Hicks is now 13 for 36 with 6 BB, 2 HR, and 2 doubles over his last 14 games, half of which were with the Y's and three of which he entered late, like yesterday agin the Brewers. That comes to a .361 BA and .452 OBP. He's on a 7-game reached-base streak, all with the O's--and has also played good defense.

Edited by LA2
  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was surprised to see the esteemed @Frobby authoring such a scorching hot take.

It's not that I'm a huge McKenna fan (I'm not, and I think there's a good chance we miss the playoffs by one game, and when that happens we'll all look at his dropped fly ball) but this is a simple decision based on one big factor for me; Hicks is 33, McKenna is 26.  

There's a lot to like about Hicks, but this is an extreme small sample size and I'm sure the love affair that this board is having with him will cool whenever his bat does.  At that point, I believe the differences between him and McKenna will be largely imperceptible and debating them will be the equivalent of arguing about which item off the menu at Taco Bell is less likely to give you diarrhea.  But then again, this is the OH and this is what we do.

If someone wants to render McKenna as kind of a doofus who doesn't always have his head in the game and is prone to making bad decisions on the basepaths, you won't get an argument from me there.  Hicks probably has him beat in that department.  But I don't believe this is some easy, clear cut decision.

I said it before earlier this week, I'll say it again:  This place is really weird.  There was such a backlash about the Hicks signing (even though it made complete sense) that I think we all forgot about Adam Frazier for a second.  And he's played better than anyone's expected in an extremely small sample size and now there's this burgeoning love affair to keep him as a 4th outfielder.  

 

 

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cowser may be promoted on  Monday and be with the team for   Tuesday vs the Blue Jays.  If Cowser gets 14 PA from Friday through Sunday he will have 200 PAs this year.   McKenna or Lester  may be optioned at that point.

An outfield of Hays, Hicks, and Cowser is possible  with Santander  DHing  when Adley is not.  Cowser would be become the leadoff batter until Mullins returns.   Because the offense needs a boost I think Cowser has a good   chance at a promotion.

I have seen no projection on when Mullins returns.

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Cowser may be promoted on  Monday and be with the team for   Tuesday vs the Blue Jays.  If Cowser gets 14 PA from Friday through Sunday he will have 200 PAs this year.   McKenna may be optioned at that point.

An outfield of Hays, Hicks, and Cowser is possible  with Santander  DHing  when Adley is not.  Cowser would be become the leadoff batter until Mullins returns.   Because the offense needs a boost I think Cowser has a good   chance at a promotion.

I have seen no projection on when Mullins returns.

I will be completely shocked if Hyde sticks Cowser in the leadoff spot. They'll more than likely move him down in the order until he shows he can hit major league pitching.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jagwar said:

I will be completely shocked if Hyde sticks Cowser in the leadoff spot. They'll more than likely move him down in the order until he shows he can hit major league pitching.  

Come along now, Jagwar, let’s not get in the way of wildcard’s fantasyland. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jagwar said:

I will be completely shocked if Hyde sticks Cowser in the leadoff spot. They'll more than likely move him down in the order until he shows he can hit major league pitching.  

I can see that.   But Cowser is a leadoff type hitter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Come along now, Jagwar, let’s not get in the way of wildcard’s fantasyland. 

I am pretty happy with the calls I have made.  92 wins might even to low.   Called Kjerstad being promoted at 200 PA.    No fantasy there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you stay with Hicks here.  He’s earned another week and if he stays the course he then probably earns his spot until the All Star break.   Cowser>McKenna too, but Mullins is the starting CF on this team and when ready he reclaims his spot full time.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, JimGinSP said:

I think you stay with Hicks here.  He’s earned another week and if he stays the course he then probably earns his spot until the All Star break.   Cowser>McKenna too, but Mullins is the starting CF on this team and when ready he reclaims his spot full time.  

Too many good players.   Where do they get playing time?  Oh, such a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • This posts wreaks of someone who has no idea what the cost of relievers are nowadays. Which is, of course, no surprise that you aren’t informed. Now that said, I don’t have an issue if you take someone out..I asked that very question. Who do you take out or what do you not acquire in favor of keeping Suarez?
    • You always have room for another high leverage guy.  And Akin has an option left according to FG.
    • Yea.  I feel the same way.  I really do not care strongly one way or another.  Sure, I think it's kind of ugly.  I also think HR's came pretty cheap before.  I like the exciting defensive plays it fosters and of course the random triple & odd carom make for some fun and unique moments.  But I don't think it helps or hurts the team in any substantial way short of helping out the pitching a little.   I sure don't think the players are changing their approaches.  If they keep it as is, that's fine with me.  If they modify it some way, that's fine with me as well.  It does seem like there is some opportunity for some unique seats down there by modifying it slightly.  When I first saw it, it almost appeared like a construction Phase 1.  That might be reasoning for pushing it back so far, allows them some flexibility in the future.   I also don't buy that a Free Agent RH hitter is going to care at all about the wall.   They are getting paid regardless.  I'd think that 1-maximizing payday 2-playing for a winner 3-finding a location that suits your family would be your priorities and your long-term stat line would be very close to the bottom of your list of concerns.  
    • His "ability to play RF" carries about $0 value
    • Yeah but if you think most of this money is going to upgrade things that are wrong or need improving, such as the ones @accinfo lists, I think you'll be disappointed.   They will be for new features, each one designed to create revenue via premium seating or premium "experience" areas or attractions that bring non baseball fans to the park to spend or sports betting related things. I'm not saying they won't fix some basic things that need it like upgrading the sound system or improving the point of sale technology.   I'm sure they will.   But the focus is going to be on the new attractions which are all designed with revenue enhancement in mind.
    • I’m not a lawyer … perhaps @Frobbymight know. Loss of income, future revenues? Damage to their franchise….Even with MASN the Orioles lost a ton on annual tv revenues
    • Congrats to the offense on playing a heck of a game. Lamar was incredible to watch, especially the play when the snap ended up on the ground and he had to run away towards the sideline and still found Likely for the score. It's very frustrating to me that the offense HAD to play so well because of the poor coaching and abysmal defensive play.  It's odd to me that Harbaugh still messes up timeout usage after being a coach in the league for over 15 years.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...