Jump to content

Does Mountcastle have any trade value?


DocJJ

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, interloper said:

The Orioles wouldn't want to trade for him, but maybe some team who is contending with a weak 1B or who needs a bat vs LHP. I could also see a rebuilding team who thinks they are ready to pop trading for him since he's still plenty young. 

I guess so, but I think you could find a bat against lefties in any system, no matter how weak.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, oriole said:

I don’t think you’re gonna get much for a first basemen that can’t hit righties, get on base, or play good defense. You may as well keep him to fit the role he is in. But a semi-permanent move has to be made. He can’t be in the lineup every day anymore. It’s beyond “bad luck”

I don't think semi-permanent is a thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would not trade Mountcastle now.   

Get him healthy.   Hyde can platoon him with O'Hearn.   At some point he can be optioned if he is not hitting.  He has 2 options.    He can work on his swing decision and plate discipline  at AAA.   He is making  738K this year and probably makes less in the minors.  He is not a financial burden.

Long term Elias may want a left-handed power hitter at 1B.   Kjerstad?  Or maybe its just a spot for Mayo though he is right-handed.

But for now I would keep him and work with him.   He is a better player than what he is showing right now.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I would not trade Mountcastle now.   

Get him healthy.   Hyde can platoon him with O'Hearn.   At some point he can be optioned if he is not hitting.  He has 2 options.    He can work on his swing decision and plate discipline  at AAA.   He is making  738K this year and probably makes less in the minors.  He is not a financial burden.

Long term Elias may want a left-handed power hitter at 1B.   Kjerstad?  Or maybe its just a spot for Mayo though he is right-handed.

But for now I would keep him and work with him.   He is a better player than what he is showing right now.

A calm, reasoned take that I can get behind. 

I definitely can see a scenario where Mountcastle goes god-mode for a month or two at the exact right time that we need him to. And if he doesn't, there's no reason we can't option him. Especially for an organization with very little true 1B depth, it makes sense to keep him in the organization. 

Edited by interloper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

Mounty doesn’t need to be dealt to a contender. 
 

If I were a team in need of a first baseman for a few more years and I had a more favorable park, I would inquire.

He’s got a lot of power and until he gets into his arb 2 season, he should be worth the money. Beyond that season depends on his performance.

A team like Cincinnati makes a lot of sense imo. Actually, 2 other teams in that division, the Cubs and Brewers make some sense too.

Cincinnati already has an IF logjam.  Spencer Steer is better than Mountcastle, Joey Votto is coming back, and they have one of the best 1B prospects in baseball who has a 1.162 OPS in AAA (Christian Encarnacion-Strand). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

He's just a burden everywhere else when not in the batter's box against a pitcher who happens to throw with his left hand.

Not if he is at AAA.  What do you think he makes at AAA.  300/yr.   So maybe 180K for the rest of the season if he is at AAA.   If  he hitting lefties I am fine with him platooning with O'Hearn for now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ArtVanDelay said:

Cincinnati already has an IF logjam.  Spencer Steer is better than Mountcastle, Joey Votto is coming back, and they have one of the best 1B prospects in baseball who has a 1.162 OPS in AAA (Christian Encarnacion-Strand). 

Does Steer also play third though?

They have one of the worst 1B productions in the league, so I assumed Steer was mainly at third.

Strand could make it irrelevant though. I know he’s a top 10 prospect for them. 

Cinci has awful production from DH too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildcard said:

Not if he is at AAA.  What do you think he makes at AAA.  300/yr.   So maybe 180K for the rest of the season if he is at AAA.   If  he hitting lefties I am fine with him platooning with O'Hearn for now.

Good, then send him to AAA.  I doubt that goes over well but I also don't care.

I'd rather just give the job to O'Hearn full time, let Tony start at 1B vs LHP if O'Hearn can't hit it and bring up Cowser.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

Does Steer also play third though?

They have one of the worst 1B productions in the league, so I assumed Steer was mainly at third.

Strand could make it irrelevant though. I know he’s a top 10 prospect for them. 

Cinci has awful production from DH too.

I can't imagine a team with terrible 1st base production thinking that Ryan Mountcastle is some sort of an upgrade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Does Steer also play third though?

They have one of the worst 1B productions in the league, so I assumed Steer was mainly at third.

Strand could make it irrelevant though. I know he’s a top 10 prospect for them. 

Cinci has awful production from DH too.

Yeah Steer can play second and third.  I believe he’s at first out of necessity right now.  The problem is that they also have Jonathan India, Elly De La Cruz and Matt McLain in the IF.  I assume Votto DHs and Steer stays at first.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I can't imagine a team with terrible 1st base production thinking that Ryan Mountcastle is some sort of an upgrade.

Mounty has been an 800ish OPS 30 homer guy recently and without the wall, my guess is that he would be approaching those numbers again.

A lot of his statcast numbers are very good. He’s an ideal change of scenery guy and other teams know this.

Most other parks he would be doing a lot better. A rebuilding team who needs some power and a first baseman could definitely view him as a higher upside play.

Edited by Sports Guy
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ArtVanDelay said:

Yeah Steer can play second and third.  I believe he’s at first out of necessity right now.  The problem is that they also have Jonathan India, Elly De La Cruz and Matt McLain in the IF.  I assume Votto DHs and Steer stays at first.

I did forget about India.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • If they were going to get rid of Fuller they should have done it a month and a half ago. The issues with our hitting were apparent the whole second half of the season. Maybe a firing or two would have sent a message to the players prior to their postseason fizzle. . 
    • What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.
    • I'm not sure that's quite it.  Well, more importantly, I'm not sure that's quite it for me. I absolutely want to win more in the playoffs.  At this point there's no question that for me I'd live through some lousy seasons if it guaranteed a World Series trophy.  I'd give up a lot for that. But unfortunately it's the weird paradox, especially in baseball, where the games that mean so much in terms of perception actually mean very little.   Just look at some the threads posted on this board in recent weeks. "Do the Orioles need more experience"?  (studies have shown this is not the case) "Maybe they need a certain type of hitter/approach!" (no, studies have shown that's not it either) "They must need to build their bullpen a certain way." (nope) "Well you have to be playing well in September to have a chance in October!"  (very much not true) "It must be those nice white boys need somebody to be a jerk" (OK, no real way to quantify that one :)) The Astros must have the secret sauce, they went to the ALCS a lot of times in a row!  Oh, they lost in the 1st round this year. Study after study after study shows that there is no pattern.  There is no "right" way to do it.  There's no way to predict from year to year which teams will or will not go on the run. If for that crazy 8-9th inning on the day after the season the Mets may not have even made the playoffs.  Now they're the example of guys that can "get it done". It's not an excuse, and frankly it's not really my opinion.  It's reality. I do 100% agree with your last 2 sentences.  I don't know what we've done to so displease the baseball gods.
    • It's definitely a possibility, but I wonder if there is actually something going on between Hyde and some players, would it be smart to bring his potential replacement in and subject him to the problem?    The fans, mostly here are the main source of BB being a manager. He's definitely had some MiL success so it's not unreasonable to assume he will be a manager someday. 
    • I think this is spot on in every way.  But I think the fanbase is somewhat divided on how important playoff success is. Put another way, for you, me, and a lot of folks, the playoffs mean a ton.  41 years with no championship or even a pennant is a real long time, and the narrative of the Orioles since 1983 has gotten extremely old. Even the narrative of this winless recent edition of the Os has gotten old. For other fans, the regular season means much more and winning/losing in the playoffs doesn't carry much weight because of the nature of the tournament.   There is no right or wrong way to be a fan of a team. But I can say that if you told me the next 10 years would involve 9 seasons where we lose 90+ games and 1 season where we win the World Series, I will gladly sign up for that.  I am definitely at that point where that title means everything to me and yes 29 teams go home without the ring each year, but 1 team does get it and that needs to be us. And if we get "lucky" like the Tigers on the path there, then bring it on! If the playoffs are a crapshoot, I am tired of that crapshoot rewarding everyone else.
    • More than once Fredi displayed a lack of control that cost him his job. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...