Jump to content

So who are the sellers right now?


Jagwar

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Baltimorecuse said:

I think WAR and a buck gets you a cup of senior citizen coffee at Mickey D's.  I think Santander will drive in a 100 this year, and hit 30+ homers, barring injury.  I HOPE there is a better version of Cowser than we've seen so far.  

I think it’s pretty likely (70%) that Cowser has a better career than Santander’s.  Maybe not more homers or RBI’s.   Better BA, better OBP, more runs scored, better defense.  But that’s not to diss what Santander has accomplished, or may still accomplish in the future.  He’s a solid player.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We'll see both teams in the next couple weeks, but the Baseball Trade Values podcast folks this week had the take both the Rays and the Dodgers (and their strong farms) have had so many pitching injuries they too will be in the thick of it fighting it out for Giolito, Eduardo and anyone else important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

We'll see both teams in the next couple weeks, but the Baseball Trade Values podcast folks this week had the take both the Rays and the Dodgers (and their strong farms) have had so many pitching injuries they too will be in the thick of it fighting it out for Giolito, Eduardo and anyone else important.

I think there is a ton of SP’s who will be available with expiring contracts. 
 

The Dodgers win the West, they get a bye. Same with Rays. Would be nice to be greedy and win the division. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I think it’s pretty likely (70%) that Cowser has a better career than Santander’s.  Maybe not more homers or RBI’s.   Better BA, better OBP, more runs scored, better defense.  But that’s not to diss what Santander has accomplished, or may still accomplish in the future.  He’s a solid player.   

I base nothing on AAA numbers, and nothing on WAR.  WAR is a statistical bridge too far for me.  There's too much subjectivity.  I don't think Cowser has the power people think he does.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Baltimorecuse said:

I base nothing on AAA numbers, and nothing on WAR.  WAR is a statistical bridge too far for me.  There's too much subjectivity.  I don't think Cowser has the power people think he does.  

WAR isn't that subjective

Batting Runs (RBI)- not subjective

Fielding Runs Above Average - You need some way to measure defense

Positional Adjustment - reasonable to me, the ability to play catcher is more valuable than the ability to play first base

League Adjustment - Of course deadball and steroid era stats should not be treated the same

Base Running Runs  - not subjective

Runs Added or Lost Due to Grounding into Double Plays- not subjective

 

/Runs Per Win.

 

Had you ever looked into what went into WAR?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Runs and RBI are extremely team dependent.  It's like measuring a pitcher by wins, it's far too elementary to be able to isolate individual performance.  WAR certainly shouldn't be relied upon on its own or really even used as a predictive stat, but as far as an all encompassing stat for player accumulated value in a given year , it's the best we have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

WAR isn't that subjective

Batting Runs (RBI)- not subjective

Fielding Runs Above Average - You need some way to measure defense

Positional Adjustment - reasonable to me, the ability to play catcher is more valuable than the ability to play first base

League Adjustment - Of course deadball and steroid era stats should not be treated the same

Base Running Runs  - not subjective

Runs Added or Lost Due to Grounding into Double Plays- not subjective

 

/Runs Per Win.

 

Had you ever looked into what went into WAR?

Actually I did.  How those numbers are weighted, particularly fielding numbers, is subjective.  As I understand it, there is more than one WAR.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Holliday went 1 for 2 with 3 walks on Friday night. 2024: .444 OBP, .911 OPS MiLB Career: .447 OBP, .931 OPS His OBP is EXACTLY what this O's team needs, would fill a key offensive weakness at 2nd base, help grind opposing pitching, and magnify the power up and down the lineup.  It's all dependent on his ability to throw and play 2B at a passable level. If Holliday starts to hit at the ML level, the question of who bats leadoff is over for the foreseeable future and we can go back to complaining about 1 slumping hitter or backup catcher at the bottom of the lineup.
    • This. We literally have no lineup holes right now, and Mayo, Norby, Jax lurk. Any trade discussion should center around the four most essential and crucial elements to O's success for the balance of the regular season and playoffs: 1. pitching 2. pitching 3. pitching 4. damn, forgot the 4th one. oh yeah, its pitching.
    • All I know is that Suárez has earned at least one more start, after today.
    • Scherzer still looks like a guy who would be a nice add to our rotation in the second half if the Rangers are sellers. 
    • Not happening. I don’t disagree, but Kremer will be slotted in the rotation.
    • I wouldn’t either but the word here is that he’s going back to rotation . Suarez supposedly the one  to be moved to bullpen . I think they should wait and see if Irvin can rebound . If Irvin can’t match Suarez’s work, then he should be moved to bullpen 
    • Yes that’s what I was asking. COC was completely off base in his comment. Judge is a great player, and apparently a nice guy. I have nothing against him, or most Yankees, for that matter, though Gil’s tats are off putting. I am expecting a bit of pro Yankee bias, but that’s ok. Also, home runs is a very glittery stat, and might sway some folks. But it should be Gunnar, at least based on the first 81.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...