Jump to content

Who is the best defensive SS? Gunnar, Ortiz or Holliday?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

At the start of 2024 I expect Frazier and Mateo to be off the team.   That leaves Gunnar, Westburg, Urias, Ortiz.     Holliday is probably not ready for the majors until sometime later in 2024.   I don't know about Mayo as a major league 3B.   He probably finds more playing time at 1B/DH.

So Ortiz being one of the top 4 infielders would probably see a fair amount of playing time until Holliday is ready for the majors.    That is Ortiz value as I project it.  And if he gets playing time and  hits he could be hard to remove from the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Range Factor this year at SS.

Gunnar       4.20

Ortiz           4.12

Mateo        3.90

Holliday      3.38 (3.60 at all levels for 2 years)

Westburg   3.27

For all those who don't like Range Factor.....Please show me a better stat that compares major and minor league fielding.

This matches my eye test, I think Gunnar has excellent range and I think he is the SS of the present and future

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

There is way too much noise in Range Factor.  Books have been written on the subject.  (Okay, I’m exaggerating, but it’s been discussed ad nauseum.)

If Gunnar has more range than Mateo, then please gouge my eyes out because they’re clearly worthless.  Gunnar’s very solid though.  

I haven’t seen enough of any of the three to make an independent judgment on the topic, but from everything I’ve read, I think Ortiz is superior to Gunnar.  I don’t really know about Holliday, but he’s less experienced, so it’s not a completely fair comparison. 


 

As far as I know Range Factor is the best stat we have for comparing major and minor leaguers range.   If you disagree please show the better stat.

Mateo had a hip injury in April and has not been quite as good as last year.  Many have commented on it.  Gouging your eyes out is not a preferred method on dealing with this discussion.

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, G54377 said:

I think Westburg will be 2B and you can flip flop Gunnar/Holliday however you'd like between 3B and SS. Ortiz will probably be traded.

Holliday is probably not ready for the majors at the beginning of 2024.   And the O's need at least 4 infielders to play 2B/SS/3B/UIF.   So Ortiz does have place on the team at the beginning of 2024.

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The more I see of Gunnar at SS the more convinced I am that he is the answer there for the foreseeable future.  I also do not think he’s a downgrade from Mateo.   Ortiz and Mateo are a bit flashier but I don’t think Henderson takes a back seat to either.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

As far as I know Ranger Factor is the best stat we have for comparing major and minor leaguers range.   If you disagree please show the better stat.

“Best stat available” doesn’t make it good.  There may be better ones in Sig’s vault, not available to the public, I don’t know.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, wildcard said:

Holliday is probably not ready for the majors at the beginning of 2024.   And the O's need at least 4 infielders to play 2B/SS/3B/UIF.   So Ortiz doesn't have place of the team at the beginning of 2024.

Sorry I didn't mean to begin 2024, just as the future map of our infield. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting that Gunnar, Ortiz and Mateo may all be considered better defensive SS than Holliday at this point.   Holliday's bat may be ahead of his glove right now.  I wonder if his defensive development keeps him in the minors because it is not as good as who is starting at SS for the O's?

A move to 2B has been suggested but is that what the O's will want to do with him?

Of course Holliday is only 19 at this point so as he fills out and gets more experience he will probably get better at SS.  The time table for this will be interesting.

If his bat plays well they will find a place for him.

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Without looking at any numbers, my assessment of defensive fielding skill (at this moment in time) rankings at Shortstop is...

1. Ortiz

2. Mateo

3. Henderson

4. Westburg

5. Holliday

 

I think Holliday just has to continue to grow physically and mature and his defense will develop. But seeing how many batted balls got by him in spring training and the Futures All Star game, I think there's some improvements to be made before he can be counted on to prevent opponents from scoring day in and day out at the top level. We have other minor league players in the organization who might be better fielders at Shortstop than Holliday at the moment. But with that said, I think Jackson will definitely improve his defense with each passing month.

I'm also at a point where I don't think the gap from Mateo and Henderson is that big defensively. They each have some pros and cons that you can use to debate which one might be the better defender. I think their game styles are different. But both are effective. I might even be close to ranking Henderson higher, based on a few nuances in Gunnar's game that I like.

With Westburg, I haven't had the chance to see him play much Shortstop so it's probably unfair to even rank him at all. That's a limited data opinion formed, there.

I didn't rank Urias because I didn't seem him when he played Shortstop. I consider him primarily a 3rd baseman and a 2nd baseman utility player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, wildcard said:

At the start of 2024 I expect Frazier and Mateo to be off the team.   That leaves Gunnar, Westburg, Urias, Ortiz.     Holliday is probably not ready for the majors until sometime later in 2024.   I don't know about Mayo as a major league 3B.   He probably finds more playing time at 1B/DH.

So Ortiz being one of the top 4 infielders would probably see a fair amount of playing time until Holliday is ready for the majors.    That is Ortiz value as I project it.  And if he gets playing time and  hits he could be hard to remove from the team.

Urias will be gone too. I think we trade Urias, Mateo, and McKenna this offseason. McKenna is out of options for next year. However, we don’t try and trade for MLB players, but instead aim for guys in A ball that don’t have to be on the 40 man. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Urias will be gone too. I think we trade Urias, Mateo, and McKenna this offseason. McKenna is out of options for next year. However, we don’t try and trade for MLB players, but instead aim for guys in A ball that don’t have to be on the 40 man. 

I am not on board with trading Urias.   Gunnar, Westburg, Ortiz and Urias make 4 infielders for 3 spots plus a UIF.    I don't know how long it will take for Holliday to be ready for the majors.   I don't see it happening at the beginning of 2024.

Urias is hitting right-handed pitchers for a 833 OPS plus he has a GG.

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I am not on board with trading Urias.   Gunnar, Westburg, Ortiz and Urias make 4 infielders for 3 spots plus a UIF.    I don't know how long it will take for Holliday to be ready for the majors.   I don't see it happening at the beginning of 2024.

Urias is hitting right-handed pitchers for a 833 OPS plus he has a GG.

I really like Urias too. Just because we have better does not take away from him. I think we trade him in the offseason for the best package and Ortiz takes over his role. Which is a very valuable role. It’s not starter or bust. 

I have hope that Holliday is our starting SS come September, but I don’t want to side track this thread. It doesn’t really affect Urias and Mateo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I really like Urias too. Just because we have better does not take away from him. I think we trade him in the offseason for the best package and Ortiz takes over his role. Which is a very valuable role. It’s not starter or bust. 

I have hope that Holliday is our starting SS come September, but I don’t want to side track this thread. It doesn’t really affect Urias and Mateo. 

So you think Holliday is going to go through AA and AAA and be promoted to the O's in Sept?   I don't see that happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I respect your opinion and your research. I hope it’s only $5 million the rest of the way so that he’s actually an option for us. With him making a second healthy successful start, I assume the definite details of what is owed will be talk about here soon.  He’s going to be #1 on all the sites/platforms of players most likely to be trade or best available. However they word it.  So the question is… Is McDermott enough to outbid all of baseball, and would we be comfortable with that?  Assuming the Rangers would want pitching for pitching as most teams do. 
    • Good thread.  I hadn’t realized he was on a roll like this.  Hopefully, he keeps it up.  Definitely an option this year and next.
    • Amparo made it to at least 49 PA with a strikeout but he went down once yesterday so the no K streaks are over.  Felix Amparo just edged out Adriander Mejia for the most PA without striking out.
    • they could also reward batting discipline by forcing pitchers to throw real strikes with at least a robo challenge system
    • Perfect, let’s go get him AND Verlander! 
    • I didn’t catch it myself but someone pointed out that Matthew Etzel did not make the top 45.   That’s either an oversight or just plain ridiculous.
    • You could. But I think that's harder because every player has their own bat they like. Bats aren't, and haven't ever been, subject to the same kind of requirements balls are. The ball is a very specific size and weight and COR, etc. The rules about the bats are basically that they can't be longer than X (something crazy like 48", which nobody has used in a century+), or heavier than Y (again, tailored to deadball or Ruth era batters). I think the pushback from fans and players if they went away from wood would be very substantial. I think much more substantial than the pushback for the pitch clock or other recent changes. Just guessing, but I think it would be easier to convince the world that moving the mound back is a better option. Just moving away from the sound of ball hitting wood bat might spark a revolution. There are no shortage of people who say college baseball isn't real baseball because of aluminum bats (even if they've moved to composite? I don't watch enough college ball to know.) Also, if you're not careful you could get into a college baseball situation where before they got the bats under control teams were scoring like 10 runs a game or more. And I have no idea of the underlying reasons, but in 2023 the median runs/game across all college baseball leagues was nearly seven, which is a level that hasn't been approached in MLB since the 1800s. The ACC averaged 7.5, which makes pre-humidor Coors look like a Camden Yards where every batter is a right-handed pull hitter.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...