Jump to content

The O's ARE a small market team -- but so what?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, brucewayne said:

The DC suburbs is wealthier than the Baltimore area. Those fans are Nationals fans. Our state economy is not growing. Our competitors are. We become a smaller market every year. Everybody with money leaves. Martin O'Malley made sure of that with his tax hikes. The first rule of state and local taxes is the more you tax the less money you have. The tax base leaves to another state.

No politics on the board.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Frobby after reading your article and the time you put into the research (as usual) two things happened.  After years of being lazy and not subscribing / supporting Tony and the Hangout folks I finally and immediately subscribed.  Second, either John Angelos is completely 1) clueless 2) believes he can negotiate like dad 3) trying to prove something to dad or 4) all of the above.  I go for 4.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

No politics on the board.   

I'm having a hard time understanding what your observation is here in this thread. You seem to be suggesting that there isnt much competitive advantage in being a large market team. When in the last 30 years only 1 small market team or to be more precise only 1 team with a bottom 3rd payroll has won. There is a relationship between market size, payroll and championships.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, TonySoprano said:

@Frobby can you give us a link to the RSMS list?  Thanks.

It takes a bit of scrolling.  Here is a link to the new CBA.  The list appears at page 254 of the document/page 270 of the PDF.   So far as I know, the new CBA was only recently posted on the MLBPA website, long after the 2022 work stoppage was resolved.  I’ve been looking for it ever since. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, brucewayne said:

I'm having a hard time understanding what your observation is here in this thread. You seem to be suggesting that there isnt much competitive advantage in being a large market team. When in the last 30 years only 1 small market team or to be more precise only 1 team with a bottom 3rd payroll has won. There is a relationship between market size, payroll and championships.

My observation is that (1) the O’s are a small market team, but (2) they are nowhere near the payroll they can afford and they can certainly afford to sign a few long term deals if they are careful about it.  I am not at all suggesting that there is no competitive advantage in being a large market team.  Of course there is.   

And none of that relates to my no politics on the board comment.  That’s a clear board rule.
 

Edited by Frobby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

My observation is that (1) the O’s are a small market team, but (2) they are nowhere near the payroll they can afford and they can certainly afford to sign a few long term deals if they are careful about it.  I am not at all suggesting that there is no competitive advantage in being a large market team.  Of course there is.   

And none of that relates to my no politics on the board comment.  That’s a clear board rule.
 

You may be correct. I havent seen their financials. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How MLB views market size from the most recent CBA. Defined market area is in there somewhere but I can't find it, I know that the Nationals received PG and Montgomery.

Unfortunately, I cannot seem to format this correctly but it is on page 254 of the attached CBA.  Note that MLB views the Orioles as having the 23rd largest market. DC is 10th. 

ATTACHMENT 26 REVENUE SHARING MARKET SCORE *  RANK CLUB SCORE 1 NYY 235 1 NYM 235 3 LAA 180 3 LAD 180 5 CHI 120 5 CWS 120 7 TOR 115 8 OAK 111 8 SF 111 10 WSH 110 11 PHI 110 12 BOS 102 13 TEX 99 14 ATL 97 15 HOU 92 16 SEA 87 17 MIN 79 18 ARI 76 19 TB 74 20 DET 73 21 COL 73 22 MIA 69 23 BAL 68 24 SD 62 25 CLE 62 26 STL 58 27 PIT 56 28 KC 55 29 CIN 51 30 MIL 5

https://tinyurl.com/cpyaza5d

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

It takes a bit of scrolling.  Here is a link to the new CBA.  The list appears at page 254 of the document/page 270 of the PDF.   So far as I know, the new CBA was only recently posted on the MLBPA website, long after the 2022 work stoppage was resolved.  I’ve been looking for it ever since. 

There must be some secret sauce baked into how they come up with those numbers.

Going by 2022 Metropolitan Statistical Area data, Baltimore is 20th, 2.835M; DC is 6th, 6.373M.  Tampa is 17th 3.290M;  Milwaukee is 40th

San Diego is 18th 3.276M, on MLBs chart their 24th, yet they have the 3rd highest payroll, maybe Angelos can reconcile how they do it.

Note to John Angelos, Nashville is 35th, 2.046M 1.559M

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolitan_statistical_area

Edited by TonySoprano
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TonySoprano said:

There must be some secret sauce baked into how they come up with those numbers.

Going by 2022 Metropolitan Statistical Area data, Baltimore is 20th, 2.835M; DC is 6th, 6.373M.  Tampa is 17th 3.290M;  Milwaukee is 40th

San Diego is 18th 3.276M, on MLBs chart their 24th, yet they have the 3rd highest payroll, maybe Angelos can reconcile how they do it.

Note to John Angelos, Nashville is 35th, 2.046M 1.559M

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolitan_statistical_area

Nashville is a growing city with a bright future ahead. Baltimore was once the 2nd largest city in America. And was the 7th largest city as recently as 1970. Our GDP is stagnant in the state of Maryland. And all the growth is concentrated in the DC suburbs which is Nationals market. Baltimore is the murder capital of the country. Has a terrible school system, has sky high taxes and lacks economic opportunity. This is a failed city. Just like Detroit is. Baltimore will only further decay. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TonySoprano said:

There must be some secret sauce baked into how they come up with those numbers.

Going by 2022 Metropolitan Statistical Area data, Baltimore is 20th, 2.835M; DC is 6th, 6.373M.  Tampa is 17th 3.290M;  Milwaukee is 40th

San Diego is 18th 3.276M, on MLBs chart their 24th, yet they have the 3rd highest payroll, maybe Angelos can reconcile how they do it.

Note to John Angelos, Nashville is 35th, 2.046M 1.559M

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolitan_statistical_area

It's odd as specific as the CBA is I couldn't find the formula either, but it's certainly biased in the Orioles favor versus other demographic based models as you note above.  Sorry for the double post, hadn't realized Frobby listed the CBA/share.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I have to think something is going on behind the scenes. They look like they have just quit. Hyperbole, I know, but I wonder if there is anxiety over new ownership wanting their own people in the FO? Before you all tear me apart, IT’S JUST AN OBSERVATION!
    • Some don’t like this quote from Hyde but this kind of goes back to what the hitting coaches are saying. The coaches (if we are to believe them) are preparing these guys but once they get in the box, things are changing. This is all mental with these guys. It is time for them to relax and start having fun again. They need a players only team meeting and get themselves loosened up.
    • I doubt it is normal, though I’m sure that well more than half the pitchers who pitch for any particular team were not drafted by that team.   Teams use so many pitchers these days, and there are so many pitchers who cycle around the league off the waiver wire.  
    • Couple of things about what Mike said: 1).   Grayson will not start during the regular season.    Time has run out to build him up.   That means Burnes, Eflin. Suarez, Kremer and Povich the rest of the way if they can stay healthy.   Maybe Grayson as an opener or a reliever in the playoffs. Coulombe  as early as Friday.  I am guess either Smith or Kimbrel go. Westy and  Urias  on rehab  in the next few days.   Getting these guys back could be a  big mental boost for the team.  What level of performance they will be able to produce coming off a layoff is another things.      I would think Mayo and Holliday are optioned. Mountcastle is swinging but his wrist is still sore.   Where that goes in anyones guess.   If he comes back Jimenez will not be needed. 2).  When Mike says this has been a winning team for that last two years and he believes they can get back to that,  to me he is not just talking about the team.     He is talking about himself.    This is the first time Mike has experienced things not going the way he planned to this degree.    Quite frankly his looks a little shell shocked.    The pitching having troubles with injuries is reality to him.  Pitchers get hurt.    But his offense going from 5 runs per game in the first half  to almost zero is shocking to him.   He did not see that coming.  Adley, and O'Hearn were supposed to step up when needed.   Instead they took a step back.  None of Holliday, Mayo, or Kjerstad being able to help in the 2nd half was not the way this was planned.    Here is hoping the Westy, Urias and Kjerstad can help real soon.  
    • This board is smart enough to realize that the grass isn't always greener. The only way I see Hyde on the hot seat is if we miss the playoffs completely, which still feels very unlikely. Even then, I doubt he'd be fired during the offseason, but maybe. But then what? I don't think you give Buck Britton a shot at this roster. He's doing his thing and doing it well at AAA helping to develop guys. Could bring back Buck Showalter or Joe Girrardi, those sound like fun names. Or better yet, I bet everyone here with a torch and a pitchfork has their own little crystal ball with a short list of candidates ready to catch lightning in a bottle. 
    • The 4-run deficit was surmountable if we had more than one player who can hit the damn ball.   Kimbrel giving up six runs in the 9th may turn out to be a blessing.    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...