Jump to content

Trade Target - Jose Quintana


sportsfan8703

Recommended Posts

LH SP. He has 1yr/$13 mil left on his deal. 

Lefties play up at OPACY because of the wall. He fits in our budget for a SP and would be in line with the Gibson/Lyles signings in terms of commitments. The Mets are rebuilding/retooling in 2024, so they may be interested in some of our prospect bats(Norby?). Outside of 2021 Quintana has been decent/good for a long time. Sinkerballer. That’s another plus with our IF defense. 

https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/jose-quintana-500779?stats=statcast-r-pitching-mlb

He’s not the big time frontline SP, but that likely isn’t available over the offseason, or not for a price we want to pay when 85% of the league has playoff aspirations. Quintana is a good fit with us. Especially if we use a 6 man rotation next year and maximize our ballpark by using LH SP. He’s a good fit to get us to the trade deadline to be in a position to buy a top rental SP. We also line up pretty well with the Mets as trading partners.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

LH SP. He has 1yr/$13 mil left on his deal. 

Lefties play up at OPACY because of the wall. He fits in our budget for a SP and would be in line with the Gibson/Lyles signings in terms of commitments. The Mets are rebuilding/retooling in 2024, so they may be interested in some of our prospect bats(Norby?). Outside of 2021 Quintana has been decent/good for a long time. Sinkerballer. That’s another plus with our IF defense. 

https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/jose-quintana-500779?stats=statcast-r-pitching-mlb

He’s not the big time frontline SP, but that likely isn’t available over the offseason, or not for a price we want to pay when 85% of the league has playoff aspirations. Quintana is a good fit with us. Especially if we use a 6 man rotation next year and maximize our ballpark by using LH SP. He’s a good fit to get us to the trade deadline to be in a position to buy a top rental SP. We also line up pretty well with the Mets as trading partners.

Regardless of Quintana or other additions, I'd be beyond shocked if they went with a six man rotation next year at any point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...
33 minutes ago, DrinkinWithFermi said:

Heading into his age 36 season next year, with a 4.56 FIP and 7.1 K/9 in 2024, and a fastball that averaged around 90 MPH.

HARD pass. We need to aim higher and there is absolutely no good reason why we can't.

That's some high standards.  Sinker ball types are always going to have higher FIPs and lower K rates.  The truth is, Quintana is probably out of our price range.  That price range is probably no more than the standard Lyles/Gibson/Kimbrel/Frazier price range until otherwise seen.  

Back to Quintana, I think he's the type of guy that if healthy could be a real weapon for us with our home ballpark and a home playoff game if we ever get deep into a series.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • No one is trading anything close to that for Crochet. But I agree..spend money, not prospects.
    • That's some high standards.  Sinker ball types are always going to have higher FIPs and lower K rates.  The truth is, Quintana is probably out of our price range.  That price range is probably no more than the standard Lyles/Gibson/Kimbrel/Frazier price range until otherwise seen.   Back to Quintana, I think he's the type of guy that if healthy could be a real weapon for us with our home ballpark and a home playoff game if we ever get deep into a series.  
    • That's really the role/opening for next year that we need.  A RHH OF that could play some CF preferably.  Although, I'd lean more to and offensive minded portion of that versus the ability to play CF.  LF is big though at home. I think it's a role that Elias fills through trade, waivers, or maybe even a competition of milb deal types.  Like a RH Sam Hilliard type.  
    • Yeah, he would be good in the Austin Slater role if he was willing to accept it. Not sure that he would be quite as good defensively in CF, given that he has played fewer than 100 innings total in CF since 2021. I highly doubt that he is ready to accept a role as a platoon player though, given that he is not yet 30, and he was an above average starter by rWAR from 2021-23. I doubt he is tendered a contract, given his $6M 2024 salary. His best bet is probably to sign a one year deal with a team that doesn't hope to compete, to attempt to reestablish himself as an everyday player, while the team that signs him can hope to flip him at the trade deadline.
    • I agree. He’d be a great regular season fit in Cinncy’s ballpark. Maybe that confidence of knowing he can hit the ball out to LF at home covers up his other decencies.  As for Crochet… can’t we just resign Burnes?  Crochet would probably cost Holliday, Basallo, and Mayo. Didn’t the deadline teach us the cost of pitching? I’m for trading Mountcastle. I’d hope we can surround the young hitters with a Burnes led staff with adding a vet bat to the DH/1B mix. Other than that, I think we will roll with what we have. And we should. 
    • Hays will want to start somewhere. He shouldn't start for us. We don't want him sitting on the bench looking dejected while Kjerstad and Cowser are mashing bombs onto Eutaw Street.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...