Jump to content

MLB Offseason Moves/Rumor Thread


ThisIsBirdland

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Pickles said:

Sure, which is exactly why getting worked up that Roch isn't some "newshound" is pretty silly.

I suspect that Roch would be the first to tell you that he's not a modern-day Mike Wallace.  Nonetheless he provides plenty of actual news along with informed commentary and I don't see any evidence that he's actively propagandizing at the behest of John Angelos.  It's time to take Roch and Melewski and the rest for what they are and not what you might hope they were.

It's also time to shoot a few bucks (or more that a few) in the direction of your local news outlets because a broad funding base is the lifeblood of principled reporting.  Pay attention to the train wreck just now starting to unfold at the Baltimore Sun as an example of what happens when you don't.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Hoskins got 2/34 from the Brewers.  Another potential comp for Santander next year.

Also further evidence that Burnes isn’t getting traded before the season. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Hoskins got 2/34 from the Brewers.  Another potential comp for Santander next year.

Hoskins is basically a 1B version of Santander with one big difference. He's historical been a great OBP guy too. I know him missing last season due to injury might have supressed his value a bit, but it's getting harder and harder for me to see a path for Santander to get more than a two year deal next year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

Hoskins is basically a 1B version of Santander with one big difference. He's historical been a great OBP guy too. I know him missing last season due to injury might have supressed his value a bit, but it's getting harder and harder for me to see a path for Santander to get more than a two year deal next year.  

Right now. I wouldn't tag him with a QO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

Hoskins is basically a 1B version of Santander with one big difference. He's historical been a great OBP guy too. I know him missing last season due to injury might have supressed his value a bit, but it's getting harder and harder for me to see a path for Santander to get more than a two year deal next year.  

The injury is a pretty huge factor.  And, he was a poor defender to begin with and his mobility may be further hampered by the injury even once he’s able to play.  So, I don’t think Hoskins’ situation says much about Santander.  I don’t really feel like having a prolonged debate on it since there’s a whole season to be played before Santander is a free agent, and how he performs in 2024 will have a large impact on his marketability.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

Hoskins is basically a 1B version of Santander with one big difference. He's historical been a great OBP guy too. I know him missing last season due to injury might have supressed his value a bit, but it's getting harder and harder for me to see a path for Santander to get more than a two year deal next year.  

Depends if Santander repeats this year again. Hoskins not only missed a full season but is a year old than Santander will be, and has less defensive value. He also hasn’t had the great OBP since 2020.

I could see Santander anywhere from a 1-4 year deal, depending on how spendy teams are next offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Nevin was our Lewyn Diaz replacement. Johnson is our Daz Cameron replacement. 

Pretty sure Diaz was the same signing as O’Hearn - a lefty 1B/DH bat to spell Mountcastle and McCann. Thankfully one of them worked out, but Nevin seeing any major league time would be a disaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

Hoskins is basically a 1B version of Santander with one big difference. He's historical been a great OBP guy too. I know him missing last season due to injury might have supressed his value a bit, but it's getting harder and harder for me to see a path for Santander to get more than a two year deal next year.  

Yep…I think 2/40 would be his max and that’s if he has a really good 2024..in all likelihood, he’s a 2/30ish type guy.  As CoC said, you don’t offer him a QO. For 21 million for 1 year, I think he takes that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sports Guy said:

Yep…I think 2/40 would be his max and that’s if he has a really good 2024..in all likelihood, he’s a 2/30ish type guy.  As CoC said, you don’t offer him a QO. For 21 million for 1 year, I think he takes that.

I think his value as a switch hitter is huge to us given our propensity to draft LHH, platoon heavily, and the wall. We’ve got Mayo coming up, but besides that it’s just Adley, Hays, Mountcastle, Westburg at the top of the order vs LHP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, brooooksy said:

I think his value as a switch hitter is huge to us given our propensity to draft LHH, platoon heavily, and the wall. We’ve got Mayo coming up, but besides that it’s just Adley, Hays, Mountcastle, Westburg at the top of the order vs LHP

The whole switch hitting thing doesn’t matter if you aren’t good hitting from both sides of the plate.  Most switch hitters are inconsistent at that. Santander has multiple years where he struggled on one side and was good on another.  
 

I would rather just have the better player and not be so worried about things like that and we have several guys with a higher upside that play the same positions he does.

Signing him to a multi year deal means there was a failure by someone.  Whether it’s a player not putting in the work, the PD people not getting the most of a player, etc…but we should be able to get a 2-3 WAR CI/COF/DH type guy from our system or we should be able to find a Renato Nunez guy that can give us 25-30 Homers and a 750ish OPS for a fraction of the cost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

The whole switch hitting thing doesn’t matter if you aren’t good hitting from both sides of the plate.  Most switch hitters are inconsistent at that. Santander has multiple years where he struggled on one side and was good on another.  
 

I would rather just have the better player and not be so worried about things like that and we have several guys with a higher upside that play the same positions he does.

Signing him to a multi year deal means there was a failure by someone.  Whether it’s a player not putting in the work, the PD people not getting the most of a player, etc…but we should be able to get a 2-3 WAR CI/COF/DH type guy from our system or we should be able to find a Renato Nunez guy that can give us 25-30 Homers and a 750ish OPS for a fraction of the cost.

His career splits are .758 and .785 from each side of the plate. Not sure what the point is of debating that some years he’s better on one side or the other when the overall result is pretty close.

I don’t actually think we’ll see him back here, but I think he’s more valuable to us because of our lack of RHH and platoon matchups than you’re letting on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I would be OK with this and it’s what Hyde was doing with Kimbrel in a way too. We’ve got guys that can match up, let’s try to take advantage. 
    • A 90 win season with Grayson missing at least 10 starts, Means and Bradish missing at least 20 each.  Throw in Tyler Wells missing most of the season and other injuries I think this team and its management has done well.  If just a little more healthy they could have had back to back 100 win seasons.  I am glad we have Mike Elias and Brandon Hyde leading this team.  
    • Some interesting things of note from https://www.samford.edu/sports-analytics/fans/2023/Sabermetrics-101-Understanding-the-Calculation-of-WAR. I pulled out the relevant areas: Fangraphs allocates 570 WAR for position players and 430 WAR for pitchers, while Baseball-Reference allocates 590 WAR for position players and 410 WAR for pitchers The major difference between fWAR and bWAR comes from the measurement of fielding runs, which is the defensive output a player provides. Fangraphs uses a statistic called Ultimate Zone Rating (UZR), while Baseball-Reference uses a statistics called Defensive Runs Saved (DRS). The differences in these stats can lead to drastically different calculations in WAR for some position players. UZR takes into account 3 years of players’ data as well as MLB data to determine these percentages, whereas DRS uses essentially 1 year of data. Therefore, some rookies will have drastically different UZR and DRS stats. As opposed to positional players, Fangraphs and Baseball-Reference take drastically different steps in calculating the WAR of pitchers. It does not follow the formula for position players but does try to calculate the “wins” that a pitcher gives to their team. Instead, they use a “base” statistic to help calculate WAR. Fangraphs uses FIP, or fielding independent pitching, as its base for calculating pitchers' WAR, whereas Baseball-Reference focuses on Runs Allowed per 9 innings (RA9) for its base I think the main takeaway for Gil, bWAR likes him more than FanGraphs probably because FG aims to take the defensive element out of the calculation by centering on FIP. And if we look at FIP, his is close to 4. But Baseball Reference is using RA9 which does have a defensive element inherently calculated. As for Cowser, I reckon FG likes him more than BBRef particularly on the defensive metric side of things. Maybe BBRef is harsher on the DRS side than FG is on the UZR side. To me, I like FG for pitchers far more than BBRef. For position players, I’d give the nod to FG but mainly because I think DRS can have some wide swings where UZR has a tendency to be more centered.
    • Win game 1, Kremer/Suarez game 2, win game 2, Eflin game 1 ALDS? Win game 1, Kremer/Suraez game 2, lose game 2, Eflin game 3? Lose game 1, Eflin game 2?
    • The win tonight in game 161 allowed the 2023-24 Orioles to reach 191 wins, tied with the 1964-65 and 1965-66 teams for the 7th most wins in consecutive seasons.  With a win tomorrow, they could move up to a tie for 5th. Tonight’s win also gave the O’s 275 wins over the last 3 seasons, tied for 11th with the 1975-77 and 1976-78 O’s.  They could move into a tie for 10th with a win tomorrow.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...