Jump to content

Kyle Bradish Has Sprained UCL, Will Start Season On IL (4/9 Update: Assigned rehab assignment w/Aberdeen)


DrinkinWithFermi

Recommended Posts

It was nice to see on a spot check Bradish got about another $1.6M out of the pre-Arb pool for the outstanding performance last year.     I think that probably about doubles his lifetime earnings to date from his playing career, and agents and the overhead of being an elite athlete probably burn through a lot of that first million.

Grayson OTOH has that First Five already, so if he can earn as much or more from the 2024 pre-Arb pool it'll still be a tidy percentage but shy of double.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, jabba72 said:

Im not expecting Bradish to be able to throw 100 pitches for 30 starts this year with a strained UCL.

Might as well get the TJ as soon as he realizes max effort isnt working.

If he realizes max effort isn’t working.  

You don’t need to worry about him making 30 starts.   In the most optimistic scenario he’d make maybe 24 starts this year.   

I’ll leave it to the medical professionals and trainers who have examined and are working with Bradish to figure out his odds of pitching this year.   I’m not a doctor, and even if I was, we have scant information about the initial degree of the tear or how the tear has responded to PRP.    This is way more nuanced than “all UCL tears lead to TJ surgery.”  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the popular “might as well get the TJ” idea is a little overoptimistic about TJ recovery. Yes most MLB level guys come back and can perform well, but there’s also plenty of guys who were never quite the same, whether because of the TJ Itself or other complications along the way. Look at Dylan Bundy. Or look at how we talk about John Means 2 years after his surgery. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Spy Fox said:

I think the popular “might as well get the TJ” idea is a little overoptimistic about TJ recovery. Yes most MLB level guys come back and can perform well, but there’s also plenty of guys who were never quite the same, whether because of the TJ Itself or other complications along the way. Look at Dylan Bundy. Or look at how we talk about John Means 2 years after his surgery. 

While I 100% agree with your overall point and have stated the same I don't like the Bundy example because of his shoulder calcification issue.  He's a unique case.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Spy Fox said:

I think the popular “might as well get the TJ” idea is a little overoptimistic about TJ recovery. Yes most MLB level guys come back and can perform well, but there’s also plenty of guys who were never quite the same, whether because of the TJ Itself or other complications along the way. Look at Dylan Bundy. Or look at how we talk about John Means 2 years after his surgery. 

I get your point, but I'm not sure that Dylan Bundy s the best example to make the case. Bundy hadn't established himself at the MLB level before the surgery so we have no idea if his struggles were surgery-related or if he was just a prospect who never lived up the hype. And to be honest he's at least been a serviceable MLB starter for most of his career. His career ERA isn't that much higher than Kyle Gibson's. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

I get your point, but I'm not sure that Dylan Bundy s the best example to make the case. Bundy hadn't established himself at the MLB level before the surgery so we have no idea if his struggles were surgery-related or if he was just a prospect who never lived up the hype. And to be honest he's at least been a serviceable MLB starter for most of his career. His career ERA isn't that much higher than Kyle Gibson's. 

Bundy is a tough case because he had the shoulder calcification also.  My memory is that Bundy was a mid to high 90’s guy when his career started at Delmarva with easy velocity.  I thought he looked off at the Futures game that year where it looked like he was going max effort just to hit 94-95.  By the time he pitched in the majors that September I recall him being 91-93.  I  think he went  down the next spring.   For whatever reason the velocity never came back.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike Elias said on MLB Network that Bradish would possibly be back in the first half.   Though that is definitive its the first time I have heard O's management put any kind of time frame on Bradish return.

So I will think by the All Star break for now if all goes well.

https://www.mlb.com/orioles/video/mike-elias-discusses-success-of-the-orioles

 

Edited by wildcard
  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

Mike Elias said on MLB Network that Bradish would possibly be back in the first half.   Though that is definitive its the first time I have heard O's management put any kind of time frame on Bradish return.

So I will think by the All Star break for now if all goes well.

https://www.mlb.com/orioles/video/mike-elias-discusses-success-of-the-orioles

 

He actually answered with Means and Bradish, collectively, as being back possibly soon in the first half.  Your timeline might be correct.  I suggest people click on the link.   Thanks for providing it.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Going Underground said:

Until Bradish starts throwing off a mound  and how he progresses it is all just speculation.  Should have a much better idea after that.

Right.   I hope that happens before the end of ST but that’s probably a best case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/25/2024 at 4:21 PM, RZNJ said:

Bundy is a tough case because he had the shoulder calcification also.  My memory is that Bundy was a mid to high 90’s guy when his career started at Delmarva with easy velocity.  I thought he looked off at the Futures game that year where it looked like he was going max effort just to hit 94-95.  By the time he pitched in the majors that September I recall him being 91-93.  I  think he went  down the next spring.   For whatever reason the velocity never came back.

Yep, even when he came up to the MLB at first the velo was never what he had in MILB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • The outfield might be slick from all the rain. I think that can influence lineup decisions.
    • @Bahama O's Fanor a free trial of any streaming platform. YouTube TV, Directtv, etc. 
    • I’ve been rending my garments over Adley and his struggles for months now. But I will say that it seems like a bit of an odd time to come together as a group on the notion of benching him — just as he’s been starting to show some signs of being Adley again.  Over the last week of the season, Adley had a 50% hard hit rate and an average EV of 89.9 MPH. Those numbers absolutely dwarf what he was doing for months, when he was sitting at more like a 26% HH rate and an 85 MPH EV. Anecdotally, I can’t even remember the last time we saw Adley drive a ball into the left-center gap like he did multiple times against MIN. That’s Adley at his very best, and it was a sight for sore eyes.  I’m not sold that he’s 100% back, and I would still stick with McCann catching Burnes tomorrow (especially since using Adley as the DH is viable with a LHP starter in Ragans). But I sincerely doubt we can run the table without at least a few stretches of Adley being Adley — so I think this recent spurt is probably enough to warrant sending him out there every day still, in hopes that he really is getting it locked back in.
    • Apparently, if you just waited to buy tickets, you could just basically go for free. Well done orioles.
    • Well, they likely would not have drafted an overslot SS with the second round pick if they had taken another HS SS first overall, so would you rather have Henderson and Rutschman or just Witt? 
    • It’s my understanding that nationally televised games are usually blacked out. Consider a free trial subscription of Fubo if they are still offering it. 
    • The Orioles starters absolutely have to do better against the Royals. You can't ask this bullpen to pitch most of the game and expect to win. Right now I probably trust Coulombe the most and Soto (which I never would have guessed a couple weeks back). Perez has been really shaky recently to the point I'm wondering is he nursing a tired arm or minor injuey. Cano hasn't been good as well and O's really need him to get back into a groove. And Akin is usually trustworthy, but only starting the inning clean.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...