Jump to content

Kyle Bradish Has Sprained UCL, Will Start Season On IL (4/9 Update: Assigned rehab assignment w/Aberdeen)


DrinkinWithFermi

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Yea, I think we have to assume Bradish is done for the year.

I don’t see any reason to believe differently.

I think this is a bit of an over reaction.  Is there a chance this happens? Yes.  However, the GM stated this morning he expects him back this season.  I think we can wait and see how the throwing program goes over the next couple weeks before we call the season a wrap. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sports Guy said:

Means is unreliable and you can’t assume the best for Bradish.

So if you are looking to make a real move, you can’t just bring in some mediocre back end guy.

Get on the phone with the Marlins. 

They knew all of this a month ago.

Trying to make a deal after make this stuff public knowledge isn't the smart play.

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sportsfan8703 said:

If I'm Elias then I'm looking to bring in Lorenzen ASAP.  Then working the phones for a trade or begging ownership for money to sign one of Snell/Montgomery.  

Lorenzen sure, but standard Sigbot plug that stuff like this is why I believe it intrinsically tries to steer away from long years for Arms.

We'd have been doing cartwheels this winter had Bradish taken a ~$50M guarantee like Hunter Greene, but if this becomes TJ in the next 5 years he won't earn anywhere near that.

Bradish is 27.5, has a UCL tear and probably just a couple million gross in lifetime baseball earnings, before agents and the high Investing in Yourself overhead many elite athletes sensibly choose to make.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

They knew all of this a month ago.

Trying to make a deal after make this stuff public knowledge isn't the smart play.

Yeah unfortunately spring training basically forces Elias to come clean with all this. I'm sure he would have liked to close a deal before now, but it is what it is. 

Edited by interloper
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RVAOsFan said:

I think this is a bit of an over reaction.  Is there a chance this happens? Yes.  However, the GM stated this morning he expects him back this season.  I think we can wait and see how the throwing program goes over the next couple weeks before we call the season a wrap. 

Of course that’s what he said. Unless he was definitely going under the knife, I wouldn’t expect him to say anything different.

I believe they also said Tate would be coming back last year. And I predicted he wasn’t going to pitch in 2023.

His ligament is torn. 
 

Maybe he becomes the really rare guy where rest and prp makes a difference but I see zero reason to actually believe that to be true.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously, how much WOULD Montgomery cost? Our payroll is now about 90M, which is not nothing but still bottom tier. And new ownership, new and exciting possibilities, increased attendance, including lots of disgruntled folks from the dumpster fire in the Nats organization, and when has there been a Better time for a solid FA?

Its not like 3/55 for Ubaldo.

And it would be kind of nice to snipe a starter from Texas, who also needs SPs.

Edited by Philip
Typo
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, interloper said:

It happened when he started throwing in January. 

 

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

He had it a month ago.

Oh well.  

An arm only has so many bullets in it before it needs TJ.  If he had it in January, it was gonna happen in camp.  They all break, it's just a matter of time.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Philip said:

Seriously, how much WOULD Montgomery cost? Our payroll is now about 90M, which is not not nothing but still bottom tier. And new ownership, new and exciting possibilities, increased attendance, including lots of disgruntled folks from the dumpster fire in the Nats organization, and when has there been a Better time for a solid FA?

Its not like 3/55 for Ubaldo.

And it would be kind of nice to snipe a starter from Texas, who also needs Saps.

Maybe 6/$150? Something around there? You'd love to get him for 5 though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

If I'm Elias then I'm looking to bring in Lorenzen ASAP.  Then working the phones for a trade or begging ownership for money to sign one of Snell/Montgomery.  

I wonder if Burnes was the move to replace/insure Bradish. Apparently the Bradish injury happened in January.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, interloper said:

Yeah unfortunately spring training basically forces Elias to come clean with all this. I'm sure he would have liked to close a deal before now, but it is what it is. 

I think that if he thought a deal needed to be closed he would have pushed for it and it would be done by now.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, interloper said:

Yeah unfortunately spring training basically forces Elias to come clean with all this. I'm sure he would have liked to close a deal before now, but it is what it is. 

It’s not like Elias is going to give up more because another team thinks he’s desperate.  Just absurd to think that.

I do agree that Lorenzen could be the play. Not what I would do but he can start and if by some miracle these 2 get back, you can put him in the pen.

He never made sense as the primary new starter but in a situation like this, he makes more sense.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Philip said:

Seriously, how much WOULD Montgomery cost? Our payroll is now about 90M, which is not not nothing but still bottom tier. And new ownership, new and exciting possibilities, increased attendance, including lots of disgruntled folks from the dumpster fire in the Nats organization, and when has there been a Better time for a solid FA?

Its not like 3/55 for Ubaldo.

And it would be kind of nice to snipe a starter from Texas, who also needs Saps.

I would rather get a guy like Lorenzen / Ryu on a one year deal.  Problem with Montgomery signing isn't just a question for our payroll this year its a question for the next several years when we need to be accounting for additional payroll to extend our young core stars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Frobby said:

If there’s one thing I hate, it’s buzzkill news on the first day of camp.   Dear God!    

It's the norm.   The team knows about offseason injuries but doesn't have to publicize them until reporters show up in camp and see who is not throwing and the injuries can't be hidden anymore.

Because I am lazy and haven't cleaned out my swollen e-mail box and assorted folders, I went back to the first day of camp last year and found an e-mail I sent to a co-worker upon hearing last year's first-day-of-camp injury dump.   It was revealed that day:

 -- "Dillon tate suffered a flexor tendon/forearm strain in November and will likely not be able to pitch until May"
 -- "Felix Bautiosta is on a rehab program for his knee and shoulder, will be late getting into games, hopes to be ready for Opening Day"
 -- "DL Hall showed up and had right lower lumbar discomfort, which he said started 3 weeks ago, and is not throwing"
 -- "Nick Vespi had sports hernia surgery in January and will not be ready at the start of camp"

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a lot of fun hearing all of the national baseball talking heads call the Orioles a bonafide WS favorite after the Burnes trade, but losing Bradish for the year (and let's be real here, we absolutely are losing him for the year) takes us out of that conversation, IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • It's fine, but I would personally prefer having Cowser and Adley taking tons of pitches back-to-back before Gunnar further punishes the opposing starting pitcher with high exit velo barrels. 
    • I was going to say pretty much the same thing about Cowser in my post, but left out my thoughts to keep the post more Gunnar-centric. But I totally agree that Cowser fits the best as this team's leadoff hitter, especially since Holliday doesn't look like he's going to make an impact offensively as early as most of us thought heading into the season.  Going back to last season, I've said Cowser has the best mix of patience, hit tool, power, and speed to be a great leadoff hitter. The strikeouts are most likely always going to be high with him, but he has .380-.400+ OBP makeup, and having someone like that hitting leadoff with Adley and Gunnar hitting directly behind Cowser is going to set things up for an elite offense which is much more dynamic and less one-dimensional than the what we've seen up until this point. Cowser Adley Gunnar Westburg O'Hearn Santander Mountcastle Is an ideal top 7 against RHP for right now, with Kjerstad (replacing Hays) and Mayo (essentially replacing Mateo and bumping Westburg to 2B) making the lineup legitimately scary within the next couple months. Mullins and Hays need to be phased out, with Santander and Mountcastle not far behind if those two continue struggling and not reaching base enough to justify hitting in the middle of the order.
    • A lot of teams (likely driven by analytics) are putting their best overall hitter at 2 (like the Yankees batting Soto 2, and the Dodgers batting Shohei 2) to maximize ABs while guaranteeing that a high-OBP guy is batting in front of him to give him opportunities with men on base.  That's probably what we want.  It seems logical considering how thoroughly debunked small-ball in the first inning has been.  Rutschman at 3 is fine.
    • Realistically I think Adley as the leadoff guy is the best lineup for us but if he has trouble batting leadoff in half the games because he can't get his catcher's gear off fast enough then I get it.   Cowser has continued to be incredibly patient, and if Adley can't be our leadoff guy then Cowser is probably our next best option.  Of course Cowser also hits a lot of bombs, so it'd be interesting if he goes on another heater.   If Cowser gets off the schneid then Cowser leadoff and Gunnar at 2 could be incredibly potent.  I don't think Cowser is actually playing that badly, he's just been running into some bad luck.  And he's starting to wake up a little bit anyway.
    • Agreed, appreciate the stats. Gunnar isn't a leadoff hitter - he's a prototypical #3 hitter or cleanup hitter. Hyde writes poor lineups, and Gunnar hitting leadoff has been one of the consistent problems with the offense this season. Gunnar hitting mostly solo shots is both a consequence and reflection of this offense's flaws - the O's have too many low-OBP hitters in the lineup (hitting in less-than-optimal spots for the most part) and are too reliant on solo homers to generate runs. At least Hyde has started hitting Westburg leadoff against LHP, which is progress, but Hyde is way too stubborn and too slow to make the correct adjustments. He's very similar to Buck Showalter in that respect.  Anyway, I look forward to Hyde waking up and moving Gunnar down to #3/#4 against RHP.  
    • While the return on the Tettleton trade wasn't ideal, 1: I don't think you can really expect a 30 year old catcher to put up a career year and then follow it up with another one, and 2: we had Chris Hoiles who played quite well for us following Tettleton's departure.  If we had forward thinking GMs we probably would split them at C and give them DH/1B/OF games on their non catching days, which is what Detroit did with Tettleton to prolong his career after 1992.  (He was basically the same hitter from 1993-1995 but he stopped catching with regularity so his WAR was much lower.)   The Davis trade was so completely undefensible on every level, not the least of which because we already had a player who was at least as good as Davis was on the team, but he didn't fit the stereotypical batting profile of a 1B.  At least today teams wouldn't be so quick to dismiss a 10 HR first baseman if he's got an OBP of .400.
    • The Glenn Davis trade was so bad it overshadowed another really bad trade in team history. The Orioles traded Mickey Tettleton that same offseason for Jeff Robinson in part because Tettleton had an off year in 1990 with a .223 batting average and a .381 slugging percentage. Except Tettleton drew 116 walks making his OBP .376 and his OPS+ was 116. Jeff Robinson was coming off a 5.96 ERA in 145 innings pitched. I have no idea what the team was thinking with this trade. Robinson did manage to lower his ERA in 1991 to 5.18 his only Orioles season. There's no way this trade is made today in the age of analytics. Tettleton meanwhile put up 171 home runs and an .859 OPS for the remainder of his career. 😬 Just a bad trade that doesn't get talked about enough thanks to Glenn Davis.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...