Jump to content

If we had a time machine and went back to 1927 would our 2024 Orioles dominate the 27 Yankees?


Gurgi

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, NashLumber said:

Our oldest kid used to do this to me all the time when I first adopted her. Always with the hypotheticals:

"Hey Papa, would your aunt be your uncle if she had balls?"

Not really, that but you get the idea. 

It was more of, "Papa, if you could be dinosaur, which one would you be?"

Shonisaurus

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have developed the ability to send 26 men up to a century back in time...  and you're not going to take any opportunity that presents, except to send our baseball team back for an exhibition game?

If any of you know Gurgi outside the board, please visit him and take his time machine keys away.  😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Equipment is an important factor.  Are we playing with 1927 equipment? (same dirty and scuffed up ball for multiple innings, 50oz bats, crappy gloves). Do both teams have to endure 15+ double headers in a season and travel from city to city on trains?  Even with the primitive sports science and training methods of his day, Lou Gehrig would be the most jacked person on either team.  Imagine him at his peak if he had modern strength & conditioning, nutrition, and medicine. (he still would have died from ALS, but at least he'd likely live longer after being diagnosed)

Sure, pitchers back then maaaaybe topped out at 85-90mph, but if Babe and Lou dropped down from their 50oz bats to 33oz, they'd have no problem catching up to 100mph.  Austin Hays struck out 25% of the time last season, I wonder what the percentage would be if he was facing a pitcher throwing a dirty scuffed up ball?  

If training methods and equipment are equal, the '27 Yankees beat us 4-2 in a 7 game series.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, jabba72 said:

Of course the Orioles would dominate the 27 Yankees. It's very possible 2023 Oakland pitching staff could overpower them.

This makes me wonder what walk rate Ruth and Gehrig would work off Shintaro Fujinami.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

This makes me wonder what walk rate Ruth and Gehrig would work off Shintaro Fujinami.

I think Ruth and Gehrig could possibly adjust to todays game, alot more-so than others from that era.

That would be a sight to behold though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, jabba72 said:

Really, that seems to be the #1 priority for most GM's when evaluating a pitcher. Its a different game velocity wise when compared to the 1980's. Those teams are probably a lot closer to the 1927 era than teams of today are. 

I mean it’s overrated the difference between the eras.  On average there are huge differences.  But I bet the top end guys they faced had formidable fastballs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, drdelaware said:

I found a discussion on the average speed of the fastball in the Ruth era that might be of interest.

https://www.quora.com/What-was-the-average-speed-of-a-fastball-during-Babe-Ruth-era

 

I'm a fan of Johnson but I've seen video of his delivery.  He wasn't throwing 98.

It does look like he'd be really easy to steal on.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'm a fan of Johnson but I've seen video of his delivery.  He wasn't throwing 98.

It does look like he'd be really easy to steal on.

 

Look where he is standing in all the clips.  He's in foul territory near the dugout warming up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, yark14 said:

Look where he is standing in all the clips.  He's in foul territory near the dugout warming up.

Obviously.

But that was his delivery, that whippy side arm action was how he threw. 

You ain't getting 98 with that.  You also ain't getting 98 with his workload.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This winter I learned how the rWAR delta between Walter Johnson and Lefty Grove is on its surface misleading regarding their spots in the pitcher pantheon as Johnson was a strong hitter and Grove the bottom of the barrel during long careers.

Johnson beat Grove by 200 points of OPS and together they had 4000 PA.    Total rWAR goes Johnson 165-108, +54%.    Near 20 WAR of that though is hitting; pitching WAR only its 152-113, +34%.      Grove (-6.5) is I believe the farthest below replacement of any Bat in MLB history.

Johnson posted 40-ish of his WAR by the end of his Age-24 season, and Grove didn't join the Show until his Age-25 seasons after dominating in Baltimore.    He was basically Roki Sasaki (sorry, Yoshinobu Yamamoto).

Johnson and Grove had the highest career achievement of anyone born between Cy Young in 1867 and Roger Clemens born in 1962.     Grove's SABR bio is a good read - it tells how after his MLB rookie year, he chalked a barn door, spent the winter doing that, and started a Year 2 run of dominance including beating the late '20's/early 30's Yankees a bunch.     The last game of his career was the doubleheader day Ted Williams took his hacks to secure that .400 season, so "end of Lefty Grove's career" got a little bit eclipsed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Obviously.

But that was his delivery, that whippy side arm action was how he threw. 

You ain't getting 98 with that.  You also ain't getting 98 with his workload.

You're right, he wasn't hitting 98 with that.

He was hitting 99.

🙃

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...