Jump to content

What would you do?


baltfan

What would you do?  

52 members have voted

  1. 1. If you were Elias and thought Holliday wasn’t going to win ROTY to get the pick, what would you do?

    • Let him start Opening Day with the Orioles
    • Keep him down until the service time deadline passes
    • Keep him down until Late July like they did Gunnar and keep his ROTY eligibility for 2025


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

2B was/is pretty clear.   Henderson figured things out when he was 20/21.   Holliday had it figured out at 19.   Why do we ding this kid because he’s done what very few have done at his age?   I would argue that Holliday is more ready to succeed offensively than Henderson was last April.

Elias apparently disagrees.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Frobby said:

Elias apparently disagrees.   

Not necessarily.  This team won 101 and made the playoffs.  I think there’s a bit of confidence on Elias part that he can slow play Holliday, let him bake a little more, gain the extra service year, and not hurt the teams playoff chances.  That doesn’t mean he disagrees with any of the points I made.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, RZNJ said:

Not necessarily.  This team won 101 and made the playoffs.  I think there’s a bit of confidence on Elias part that he can slow play Holliday, let him bake a little more, gain the extra service year, and not hurt the teams playoff chances.  That doesn’t mean he disagrees with any of the points I made.

He’d be foolish to assume he has a margin of error for making the playoffs.  I doubt he’s assuming that.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Frobby said:

He’d be foolish to assume he has a margin of error for making the playoffs.  I doubt he’s assuming that.  

You honestly think that they take the best 26 players regardless of service time, player options, etc.?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

You honestly think that they take the best 26 players regardless of service time, player options, etc.?

I think we are in a different position now than at any other time in the Elias era.  We’re a playoff favorite for the first time.  And I think Elias’ roster choices are designed to win us the most games possible in a long 162 game season.  Considering how to preserve depth for later in the season, and how to prepare the younger players to best contribute once they are in the majors, are part of that calculus.  I think service time might have weight in a very close call, but it’s not an overriding factor.  That’s my opinion of how it should be, and how it is.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I think we are in a different position now than at any other time in the Elias era.  We’re a playoff favorite for the first time.  And I think Elias’ roster choices are designed to win us the most games possible in a long 162 game season.  Considering how to preserve depth for later in the season, and how to prepare the younger players to best contribute once they are in the majors, are part of that calculus.  I think service time might have weight in a very close call, but it’s not an overriding factor.  That’s my opinion of how it should be, and how it is.

 

Well said, as usual.  I do agree that he’s got his eye on the long haul and maintaining his depth.  I think in order to do that whether it be this season or two years down the road he’s conservative on the short term.

His plan seems to be,” lets try this and I’ve got all my pieces to make changes later”, rather than “I think these are the best 26 and I’m willing to have fewer moves available to me later on”.

I can’t believe this team isn’t better even if Jackson Holliday is playing 2B against RHP only.  I think Elias and Hyde believe that too.   Whether it’s service time or development they are willing to sacrifice short term for long term in his case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Os brought up Gunnar at the end of August, not July. Bringing him up at the end of July will likely result in him playing too much and taking ROY from him next year.

Im going option 4..extend him today and start him on OD.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

The Os brought up Gunnar at the end of August, not July. Bringing him up at the end of July will likely result in him playing too much and taking ROY from him next year.

Im going option 4..extend him today and start him on OD.

And if Holliday won’t agree to an extension?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is not out of the question that the ownership deal closes and an extension is offered. I am not expecting it, but it’s clear that we were not really offering that with Angelos and we have no idea what new ownership thinks. 
 

It’s worth noting that John Angelos has his organization in as strong a position as any team being sold ever has had before. 
 

Low payroll, deep talent on both major and minor league rosters. Talent bubbling up from international signings. 
 

There is so much available right now and so much uncertainty about the future…bright as it appears to be. I have no problem with Elias keeping all options open. But I expect him to be an AL East contender. Now and in the future. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Frobby said:

And if Holliday won’t agree to an extension?

He will if the right deal is there…but if he doesn’t, I leave him down until early June..at that point, you almost assuredly avoid super 2 and he probably loses a chance of finishing top 2 in ROY although it’s still possible.

This is the same plan I have had all offseason. Nothing has changed for me.

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

He will if the right deal is there…but if he doesn’t, I leave him down until early June..at that point, you almost assuredly avoid super 2 and he probably loses a chance of finishing top 2 in ROY although it’s still possible.

This is the same plan I have had all offseason. Nothing has changed for me.

What number do you believe would make him sign? 10/$150 or more?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Frobby said:

He’d be foolish to assume he has a margin of error for making the playoffs.  I doubt he’s assuming that.  

In another thread, you are essentially arguing that there isn’t a need to worry about the pen because we had a low save % last year.

Now you are saying we shouldn’t assume a margin for error.

Which is it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, maybenxtyr said:

What number do you believe would make him sign? 10/$150 or more?

Something in the 8/110-9/135 range. 
 

If they want to go the Witt route and add in player opt out years after that, so be it.

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • McCann looks cooked but he's in his last year and our options at backup C aren't great unless we're willing to trade for one.  But I'm not giving up a lot for a backup C.   I'd like to find a replacement for Urias.  He didn't look great last year and he's being thrust into a role that he's not really cut out for right now.  I don't think he's getting the 2022 magic back.  Maybe Westburg can go to 3rd full time and one of our 5 AAA 2nd basemen can work in with Mateo at 2nd.
    • I quoted myself, because I wanted to share something with you all.  I have memory issues.  Nothing full blown or anything, but I don't recall things nearly as well as I once did.  I mention this because it occurred to me that I posted a very similar thing about McCann last year, and he performed notably better in the 2nd half.  At least I believe so.   It's not that I feel I'm exactly wrong about McCann, but rather that he showed himself to be better just last season and could do so again.  I hope so. Memory issues are nothing to be ashamed of, though I'd be pretending if it didn't bother me.  I've been dealing with this for maybe five years or so, though it gets worse every year.  At 59, that's younger than most that have such issues.   I'm sure in a forum as populated as this one, there could be others going through what I am.  It is what it is... it's life, and I hope you're all doing your best with it. 
    • Estrada and Tejada both continued their recent surges today.  Estrada was 2 for 4 with a double, while Tejada was 3 for 3  with a homer.  Tejada has his OPS up to .737, not bad for a league where .654 is average.  Estrada is at .628 and climbing.  
    • Jeff Tackett was also part of the single-worst baserunning display I've seen in my entire life.  No exaggeration.  I was at the game with a friend who was at her first baseball game ever, and she asked me what was going on.  I still have no idea. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/sports/1993/04/18/three-man-jam-at-third-costs-the-orioles-7-5/7eb4c3d6-545f-481a-89f4-9bc0036ad89a/
    • No doubt, I'm expecting that from Mateo. But sub .600 with worse defense is a possible outcome for Holliday this year. I hope it doesn't happen but I don't think we can rule it out. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...