Jump to content

Orioles Sign INF/OF Tony Kemp


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

I wanted Holliday on the team.  He’s not.  Get over it.  Kemp is going to have a pretty minor role.

This. I question this decision but I’m not going to spend a lot of time thinking about it.   Play ball!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Too Tall said:

I have to give it to Elias. He knows how to stir the pot. 

IMO, they will bring up Holliday when THEY FEEL he is ready to play every day. There is little sense to have a 20-year-old as the 26th man. Kemp is this year's Frazier at one eighth the price. Last year it was said they wouldn't eat 8 mil so Frazier played. One mil is not a factor. Over/under on Kemp's tenure -30 days. I take the under. 

So you don't think it's a service time issue?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kemp was worth 3.4 WAR and 1.2 WAR in the two years prior to last season. Some rebound potential. He also had 44 BB to 40 SO last season. He steals some bags too. 

He’s similar to Mateo in that if he puts up a .650 OPS then he’s probably going to rack up WAR. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

So you don't think it's a service time issue?

I really don't know. I'm not as self-assured as some on here. I wanted to see him make the team, but it didn't happen. Do I think it was purely service time? No.  As I said, when he arrives, I think they want an everyday player, and they feel he still has some more work to do before they spend his service time.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason I don't like this move is that it creates another barrier to Holliday being called up.  Nevin or McKenna at least wouldn't be competing for playing time at 2B.   I was worried that Wong would make the team, then I was relieved that he didn't.   Now we have another Kolten Wong, a veteran whose vetaranosity will keep him in the majors whether he deserves it or not.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

So you don't think it's a service time issue?

If the goal is to have a placeholder until they can get the extra year for Holliday, why bring in someone from outside the organization?  I don't think they are planning to DFA Kemp on May 1.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think that if it isn't service time related you risk bringing him up to try and secure the pick.

I don't think anyone really thinks his psyche will be damaged if he struggles.

Yup.   He'd be fine.    Look at Gunnar...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, waroriole said:

Don’t gatekeep. If I wanna whine in this thread about signing a useless player, I’m 100% gonna do that. 

Ok.  The gate is wide open.  Go for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

So you don't think it's a service time issue?

Wasn't asked of me... but of course it is.  All along, I was confident it would happen so it's hard to be mad about it.  Generally speaking, within the current MLB structure, that's smart business.  What I will run seriously out of patience on is if the absolute refusal to sign anyone continues with the new ownership.  That needs time to work itself out, so we continue to wait, but there is hope the new regime will spend some of the money rather than hoarding all of it.  Obviously, a team doesn't need clock games if someone has a long term contract.  I'd wager quite a bit that, if Holliday had an 8-10 year deal, he'd be the starting 2nd baseman right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ripken said:

Wasn't asked of me... but of course it is.  All along, I was confident it would happen so it's hard to be mad about it.  Generally speaking, within the current MLB structure, that's smart business.  What I will run seriously out of patience on is if the absolute refusal to sign anyone continues with the new ownership.  That needs time to work itself out, so we continue to wait, but there is hope the new regime will spend some of the money rather than hoarding all of it.  Obviously, a team doesn't need clock games if someone has a long term contract.  I'd wager quite a bit that, if Holliday had an 8-10 year deal, he'd be the starting 2nd baseman right now.

Is it?

I wouldn't say it's the industry norm at the moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • The money is sunk at this point, but I don't think any polar answer is optimal here.  Bullpen by committee until someone emerges.  It's a little more difficult with the 3-batter rule, but that's how they need to roll and I credit Hyde for being ready with the quick hook for the last 10 days or so.
    • Great sequence in the 10th where Mateo singled, driving in Westburg, stole 2nd and went to 3rd on the overthrow.  Then Mateo scored on a wild pitch.  I've joined the Mateo fan club, at least as a utility player.  Having Mateo on base has to drive pitchers crazy.
    • As someone that was all for DFA’ing McKenna for Hicks last week, I really can’t fault him for tonight.   I’m impressed he stole the base. He sort of had to run there with two outs. He stole it. He just came off the bag. That happens.  The route may have not been the best because he was going to his left and as a RH thrower he was just trying to position himself to throw home. He doesn’t have Vlad Sr’s arm out there. That’s a .01% chance play there.  Our CF depth is pretty thin. I think the only way we DFA McKenna is if Hicks comes here. Kjerstad will be the one to go for Hays. Remember last August when at full strength/healthy Mullins, and only a 26 man roster, we rolled with a 4 man bench of McCann, Hicks, Mateo, Urias/Frazier/Westburg.  Oddly, we’re deep enough into the season, and CF depth is thin, that I’d say there’s a 50/50 shot McKenna doesn’t clear waivers. I don’t know we have the luxury of CF depth to DFA him w/o Hicks in the mix. 
    • I think they will DFA him. They already did it once. And the fact nobody claimed him means you’re probably right about not starting for other teams. 
    • I had fun watching the extra innings of this game. That was good TV. Thanks Craig for serving up the evening’s entertainment!
    • Additionally, you can hover over the user name you want to ignore and a box pops up. The last button on the right at the bottom is the ignore button, click that and check all three boxes and you're done. Source: I'm a professional ignorer.
    • We have threads asking for Kremer, Grayson, and Povich in the closer role. Can we acknowledge that Cano is the pretty obvious next man up if Kimbrel is removed at some point? I don’t really care about his 9th inning splits. He’s our best reliever and until he gets a chance and fails I’m going to assume that’s just noise and he’ll do the best job. Tonight makes nine straight appearances with either a Save or Hold. Overall he has held a lead 10 times in 11 chances, and the one miss was a bad outing but still nearly a SV if not for Gunnar’s walk-off throwing error. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...