Jump to content

Craig Kimbrel 2024


Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

His numbers in his prime weren’t exactly prime.  WHIP of 1.5.  More walks than strikeouts.  It would be similar to giving Cionel Perez every save opportunity and rack up some saves.   Stanhouse wasn’t very good but he had the job.

 

image.thumb.png.fc0c08864ee0d4b162e4b0a08e06a2b6.png

Stanhouse wasn’t very good ?  His ERA was 2.89 and 2.82 , those are not good ?   Gave up 4 HRS in 147 innings are not good ?   He had the job because he performed ( as ugly it was) .   But I agree with your 1.5 WHIP which is poor for a closer . Then again all this was over 40 years ago . If Stanhouse as back then, attempting to pitch today, he likely would get annilated ( like the other poster said ) . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Allan Bryant said:

Stanhouse wasn’t very good ?  His ERA was 2.89 and 2.82 , those are not good ?   Gave up 4 HRS in 147 innings are not good ?   He had the job because he performed ( as ugly it was) .   But I agree with your 1.5 WHIP which is poor for a closer . Then again all this was over 40 years ago . If Stanhouse as back then, attempting to pitch today, he likely would get annilated ( like the other poster said ) . 

He had a good ERA.  I think his FIP was 3.66 the one year and 4.66 the other.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

He had a good ERA.  I think his FIP was 3.66 the one year and 4.66 the other.   

Stanhouse got by. It was fine. I hesitate to call his performances good. He tightrope walked his way to a fair number of saves for the era. By bb-ref's figuring his defense was good for nearly half a run a game when he was on the mound, and Memorial Stadium was a pitcher's park.

But the same year Stanhouse had 51 walks and 34 strikeouts in 72 innings, Jim Kern had 136 strikeouts in 143 innings and a 1.57 ERA. Mike Marshall threw 90 games and 142 innings of relief to a 2.65. Señor Smoke had 106 strikeouts and 51 walks in 127 innings. Sid Monge had 108 strikeouts in relief. Rookie Mark Clear struck out 98 in 109 relief innings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Allan Bryant said:

I admit I don’t know what FIP stat represents. 

 

1 minute ago, Allan Bryant said:

I admit I don’t know what FIP stat represents. 

FIP stands for Fielding Independent Pitching. It is a statistic that measures a pitcher's effectiveness based on factors they have the most control over, such as strikeouts, walks, hit-by-pitches, and home runs, while excluding the outcomes of balls hit into play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

 

FIP stands for Fielding Independent Pitching. It is a statistic that measures a pitcher's effectiveness based on factors they have the most control over, such as strikeouts, walks, hit-by-pitches, and home runs, while excluding the outcomes of balls hit into play.

Thanks , much appreciated 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, RZNJ said:

 

FIP stands for Fielding Independent Pitching. It is a statistic that measures a pitcher's effectiveness based on factors they have the most control over, such as strikeouts, walks, hit-by-pitches, and home runs, while excluding the outcomes of balls hit into play.

And for a little more context for @Allan Bryant, it's been shown that FIP is more predictive of next year's ERA than this year's ERA. Since things like defensive support and the outcome of balls in play are very noisy, or unpredictable.

Knowing nothing else about a pitcher with a a 3.00 ERA and a 4.50 FIP, you'd do well to assume his next year's ERA will be closer to 4.50 than 3.00.

Edited by DrungoHazewood
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

And for a little more context for @Allan Bryant, it's been shown that FIP is more predictive of next year's ERA than this year's ERA. Since things like defensive support and the outcome of balls in play is very noisy, or unpredictable.

Knowing nothing else about a pitcher with a a 3.00 ERA and a 4.50 FIP, you'd do well to assume his next year's ERA will be closer to 4.50 than 3.00.

Which makes it strange anyone would go back and look at historical FIP as if it means something. It's also still not very predictive at all. At least ERA represents actual results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ScGO's said:

He will pass Smith next season, but I think that's gonna be it; just don't think he has the longevity to go for 4 or more seasons to try and chase the 1 and 2 spots.

Definite HOFer though

He'll probably shoot for 500 and then call it a career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jagwar said:

Will Kimbrel be an All Star? He's tied for 4th in saves with a 0.93 WHIP and .147 batting average against. I suggested a month or so again that he might get selected and got shot down. Is he deserving of a bid?

He could.

A lot of times the charity selections go to bullpen guys so who knows how many slots will be there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, dystopia said:

Which makes it strange anyone would go back and look at historical FIP as if it means something. It's also still not very predictive at all. At least ERA represents actual results.

I'm not sure why you'd say ERA represents actual results, while FIP doesn't. FIP accounts for actual walks, strikeouts and homers that are more-or-less just the responsibility of the pitcher. ERA lumps in all kinds of things outside of the pitcher's control, most importantly the quality of the defense behind him. And also the luck of where balls fall in or not. Also the performance of the relievers who come in after the pitcher in question has left someone on base.

Truthfully, ERA is a team stat that's heavily influenced by the pitcher. But it was all we had so we call it an individual stat.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • What is going on with him?  He looked so sharp earlier in the year and now he just looks lost at a time when our depth is being tested. 
    • If only OH existed in 1983 when the Orioles had two 7 game losing streaks and ended up losing the first game of the ALCS and World Series. There would have been posts on how Eddie Murray isn't a clutch player.
    • Elias knows he has his work cut out for him.  Even in April it was clear the bullpen needed help.  It looked like the discovery of Suarez and the return of Wells might fill the need in the bullpen, not the rotation.  Well, Wells is done at least until next season and Suarez is in the rotation.  And then Coulombe goes down.   I have confidence Elias will make some moves, probably rental type moves, though I'm crossing my fingers for a blockbuster trade for Skubal and a couple of impact bullpen arms.   Even if we end up with all rentals we may need an extra lower impact starter just in case someone else gets hurt again.  It depends on how much confidence the front office has on Povich and other minor leaguers going forward.
    • I put on my @DrungoHazewoodhat and looked up the 1927 Yankees because they're always the first team I think of when I think of a truly great baseball team. First of all, I wasn't aware of the run differential, although I shouldn't have been surprised; 975 runs scored, 599 allowed. So they didn't get blown out very much...if at all.  But they did have one game on July 9th where they lost 14-4 to the Tigers, the second game of a doubleheader in which they won the first game 19-7.  They also lost 14-8 on August 20th to the Indians. The 1983 Orioles lost 16-8 on May 4th to the Angels.  I wonder if Roy went apoplectic that night, too.
    • McDermott pitched today and lasted one third of an inning.  
    • I can dismiss it as one bad game and I will. Povich certainly has issues but you can see where he'd be pretty good if he had some command.  And he's shown flashes of having good command for some stretches. The book on him is very far from being written and I'm not so cavalier to think that the Orioles can fix anyone, but I just want to see some improvement as he goes along for the rest of the season.  Keep in mind, he shouldn't be here now...had things gone to plan, we'd have Bradish and/or Wells/Means in the rotation.   So while I was disappointed with how he looked today, I am willing to give him a little bit of a leash before passing judgement.  His flaws are obvious but I do believe they are fixable. But to go so completely overboard about this being some sort of indictment on the state of the team is a bit  absurd.  I'd say this to anyone who wrote that OP, but @Roy Firestonec'mon dude.  We've overtaken the Yankees for first place without Bautista, Means, Wells and Bradish.  We're still on pace to win over 100 games.   I'm not going to ignore some of the problems this team has right now and I do expect Elias to make some significant deals at the deadline to address the rotation and the bullpen.   But let's stop acting like the game today was some sort of tell-tale sign about the state of the team.  This board is full of educated baseball fans who have been watching for decades, everyone here should know that a team -no matter how good they are- can get blown out from time to time.
    • Today was just additional confirmation of what everyone has known for a long time: We desperately need both starting and relief pitching.  (And also for some strange reason we absolutely suck with the bases loaded).   We kind of needed starting pitching before Bradish went down.  Now, we desperately need starting pitching- possibly 2 decent starters (I'm still worried about Kremer even though he's been pretty good this year overall).  We need 2 good relievers too.  Ouch.  That's a lot of pitchers to need.     Today was just a stark reminder of that.  Povich certainly looks like he needs some more time at Norfolk.  And don't forget, this was the A's lineup- the 29th in the MLB...   Sadly, we don't have any pitchers in the minors who can help.  I'm not sure McDermott will ever have enough control to be succsssful and he's nowhere near ready for the MLB.         
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...