Jump to content

Austin Hays 2024


ShoelesJoe

Recommended Posts

22 hours ago, casadeozo said:

Ive said it before but it bears repeating. For all the praise we heap on Elias for being brilliant I've yet to see any explantation for the unwillingness to move on from players. It's almost his kryptonite.  I know some will point service time manipulation but I dont think thats an explanation for Connor Corby in his 3rd year at AAA. 

Asking this genuinely. Is the plan to have Mullins and Hays stayy through the end of 2025? Then start to give playing time to the prospects?

 

It’s universally true that a large subset of fans are always ready to jettison an established player for a shiny new player with good MiL numbers, and will react the minute the established player has a few bad games.   But no MLB GM operates that way.  Real GMs give their established players adequate time to work out if their slumps, don’t assume that the MiL player’s numbers in AAA will translate to the majors, and also look at pesky things like defense and consider the effects on other players in the clubhouse.   That’s just the way it is.  I’ve watched baseball for 58 years and this is an evergreen conversation we’ve had dozens of times around here.  Managers and GMs don’t want their players looking over their shoulder every time they have a bad week or even a bad month.   That’s no way to run a clubhouse.  Slumps are part of the game and you have to give players a fair opportunity to play their way out of them.  

That’s not saying they get forever.  But they get a LOT more than 10 games to return to their normal levels.  

I think it’s also clear that Elias believes that there are certain things minor league players need to accomplish before they get called up, even if those players might already be better than the players they’ll be replacing.   I have zero doubt that Jackson Holliday is ready to outhit Tony Kemp, and might even be so much better offensively that it would make up for defensive deficiencies.  But Holliday needs to work on his defense and Elias believes that’s best done in the minors right now, not on a stage where every miscue will be under a public microscope and could impact games that are actually meaningful.  So, we’ll wait.  

You may see that as a blind spot.  I don’t.  


 

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It’s universally true that a large subset of fans are always ready to jettison an established player for a shiny new player with good MiL numbers, and will react the minute the established player has a few bad games.   But no MLB GM operates that way.  Real GMs give their established players adequate time to work out if their slumps, don’t assume that the MiL player’s numbers in AAA will translate to the majors, and also look at pesky things like defense and consider the effects on other players in the clubhouse.   That’s just the way it is.  I’ve watched baseball for 58 years and this is an evergreen conversation we’ve had dozens of times around here.  Managers and GMs don’t want their players looking over their shoulder every time they have a bad week or even a bad month.   That’s no way to run a clubhouse.  Slumps are part of the game and you have to give players a fair opportunity to play their way out of them.  

That’s not saying they get forever.  But they get a LOT more than 10 games to return to their normal levels.  

I think it’s also clear that Elias believes that there are certain things minor league players need to accomplish before they get called up, even if those players might already be better than the players they’ll be replacing.   I have zero doubt that Jackson Holliday is ready to outhit Tony Kemp, and might even be so much better offensively that it would make up for defensive deficiencies.  But Holliday needs to work on his defense and Elias believes that’s best done in the minors right now, not on a stage where every miscue will be under a public microscope and could impact games that are actually meaningful.  So, we’ll wait.  

You may see that as a blind spot.  I don’t.  


 

Fair point. That said my point was less about Holliday and more Kjerstad and Norby and Stowers for that matter.

i dont think ANYONE would dispute they had mastered AAA last year so why are they still in the minors while Kemp and Urias are taking up roster spots.

again not saying. They are not major leaguers. Just certainly not what we expected to see based on having the kind of talent we have idling in in aaa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It’s universally true that a large subset of fans are always ready to jettison an established player for a shiny new player with good MiL numbers, and will react the minute the established player has a few bad games.   But no MLB GM operates that way.  Real GMs give their established players adequate time to work out if their slumps, don’t assume that the MiL player’s numbers in AAA will translate to the majors, and also look at pesky things like defense and consider the effects on other players in the clubhouse.   That’s just the way it is.  I’ve watched baseball for 58 years and this is an evergreen conversation we’ve had dozens of times around here.  Managers and GMs don’t want their players looking over their shoulder every time they have a bad week or even a bad month.   That’s no way to run a clubhouse.  Slumps are part of the game and you have to give players a fair opportunity to play their way out of them.  

That’s not saying they get forever.  But they get a LOT more than 10 games to return to their normal levels.  

I think it’s also clear that Elias believes that there are certain things minor league players need to accomplish before they get called up, even if those players might already be better than the players they’ll be replacing.   I have zero doubt that Jackson Holliday is ready to outhit Tony Kemp, and might even be so much better offensively that it would make up for defensive deficiencies.  But Holliday needs to work on his defense and Elias believes that’s best done in the minors right now, not on a stage where every miscue will be under a public microscope and could impact games that are actually meaningful.  So, we’ll wait.  

You may see that as a blind spot.  I don’t.  


 

But Hays isn't just 10 games. It's the second half of last season and spring training 

  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It’s universally true that a large subset of fans are always ready to jettison an established player for a shiny new player with good MiL numbers, and will react the minute the established player has a few bad games.   But no MLB GM operates that way.  Real GMs give their established players adequate time to work out if their slumps, don’t assume that the MiL player’s numbers in AAA will translate to the majors, and also look at pesky things like defense and consider the effects on other players in the clubhouse.   That’s just the way it is.  I’ve watched baseball for 58 years and this is an evergreen conversation we’ve had dozens of times around here.  Managers and GMs don’t want their players looking over their shoulder every time they have a bad week or even a bad month.   That’s no way to run a clubhouse.  Slumps are part of the game and you have to give players a fair opportunity to play their way out of them.  

That’s not saying they get forever.  But they get a LOT more than 10 games to return to their normal levels.  

I think it’s also clear that Elias believes that there are certain things minor league players need to accomplish before they get called up, even if those players might already be better than the players they’ll be replacing.   I have zero doubt that Jackson Holliday is ready to outhit Tony Kemp, and might even be so much better offensively that it would make up for defensive deficiencies.  But Holliday needs to work on his defense and Elias believes that’s best done in the minors right now, not on a stage where every miscue will be under a public microscope and could impact games that are actually meaningful.  So, we’ll wait.  

You may see that as a blind spot.  I don’t.  


 

The thesis of my post was to say is there another example of a GM having logjam in AAA and choosing to do nothing to clear it and instead add veterans (Tony kemp)

say what you will. It’s certainly not a strategy I’ve seen before

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, casadeozo said:

The thesis of my post was to say is there another example of a GM having logjam in AAA and choosing to do nothing to clear it and instead add veterans (Tony kemp)

say what you will. It’s certainly not a strategy I’ve seen before

Since the reserve clause went away?

Back in the day lots of teams would stash guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, casadeozo said:

I guess I’m more referencing the last 25 years as a reference 

That's why I asked.

I can't think of anyone recent, but honestly I didn't follow other team's farm systems all that closely 20 years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1.  I actually preferred having O’Hearn facing a tough LHP than PH Austin Hays for him.

2. Hays hit the first pitch on the nose AND didn’t try to pull it.  Hallelujah!   I can’t believe the CF was shaded to RC on that and made an easy catch of it.  
 

3.  I hope Cowser gets most, if not all, starts against RHP but even only one AB was somewhat encouraging regarding Hays.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Winter said:

Hays is going to make a decent 4th OFer

Hays in the McKenna role from last year is a reflection of the serious talent this team already has, with more premium talent on the way.

Hays is a good dude and I appreciate his career as an Oriole, but he, Urias, and Mateo need to be Wally Pipped. Cowser is an everyday player, even against lefties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Brooks The Great said:

Hays in the McKenna role from last year is a reflection of the serious talent this team already has, with more premium talent on the way.

Hays is a good dude and I appreciate his career as an Oriole, but he, Urias, and Mateo need to be Wally Pipped. Cowser is an everyday player, even against lefties.

With the makeup of the outfield, Hays is the perfect supplement as a 4th OF that plays a touch more than one. My guess is he plays LF tonight with Cowser sliding to RF. And I bet he makes a positive impact. Rising tides lift all boats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, IPlayGM said:

With the makeup of the outfield, Hays is the perfect supplement as a 4th OF that plays a touch more than one. My guess is he plays LF tonight with Cowser sliding to RF. And I bet he makes a positive impact. Rising tides lift all boats.

Agree except swap the positions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Brooks The Great said:

Hays in the McKenna role from last year is a reflection of the serious talent this team already has, with more premium talent on the way.

Hays is a good dude and I appreciate his career as an Oriole, but he, Urias, and Mateo need to be Wally Pipped. Cowser is an everyday player, even against lefties.

How do guys who don’t play get Wally Pipped?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Am I crazy for thinking Burnes isn't going to sniff Cole's deal?  I'm thinking like 7/260-280.  I don't think he's going to sniff Cole's deal.  For starters i dont think hes as good a pitcher as Cole was at the time of his signing.  Also, the Yankees aren't going to be in the bidding so that leaves the Mets, Giants, Nats, Orioles as teams that can afford him.  The Sox could too, but they're on the fringe of contention and might opt to develop more with the Yankees and Orioles solidly ahead of them in division.  Only the Mets from that list really seem like teams that would go over 300m for a pitcher, but they will be pressed for money because of the luxury tax.
    • Agree a strong RHP bullpen arm that misses bats would be good to add. Looking at Spotrac I don’t see who it would be. Dominguez could certainly be someone that could fill this role. 
    • Definitely leave the flag up. 
    • It looks like I misread your post as being about last offseason instead of the 2017-2018 offseason.  My mistake, but does that in any way affect my overall point - you know the part that I made explicit and you left out of your response - that all the old, reflexive Angelosian nonsense no longer automatically applies? I'm unclear on what you're driving at, especially if I have to go back to the 2017-2018 offseason when Peter Angelos might still have been giving input on running the team.  I think it's a stretch to try to draw parallels to those days, or even the John Angelos years, to David Rubenstein potential as an owner.
    • Irsay stealing the Colts in a midnight sneak away is in my top five depressing B-More moments, as well as the dreaded We Are Family Pirates in the ‘79 series. Otherwise, it’s a good bad list.
    • I forgot the name of the movie, but Jimmy Fallon was playing a BoSox superfan (tough role for an NY kid) and it was during the era of the ‘curse’ (right at the end of it actually) — a kid he was coaching asked, “What have the Red Sox ever done for you?” His character didn’t have an answer. But it made me think. The movie was out during the 14-years of losing seasons. I asked myself the same question about whether a lifetime of fandom was worth it. For me, outside of my family - 15 generations or more on the Eastern Shore - the O’s are also part of my DNA.  Win, lose, lose horribly, lose ugly, bad ownership, they just can’t shake me. All that said, I totally understand the frustration. It will take me a little longer to heal from this ugly exit to 2024.
    • In the market and $$$ for SP = Mets, Cubs, BOS, WAS and SFG (depending on Snell opt-out).  That’s enough chairs when music stops for Burnes and Fried to cash in, and still ample for second tier Eovaldi, Manea, Kikuchi, Flaherty.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...