Jump to content

Heston Kjerstad 2024


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, glenn__davis said:

I'm taking these early Norfolk numbers with a bit of a grain of salt because clearly something isn't normal there, but.... talk about beating the door down.

Charlotte is the White Sox AAA affiliate, and they were begging us for pitching, so that kinda checks out. But Durham is the Tampa affiliate, and they put up 29 runs in 3 games. Or maybe MLB is secretly testing the next juiced ball for Norfolk games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, glenn__davis said:

I'm taking these early Norfolk numbers with a bit of a grain of salt because clearly something isn't normal there, but.... talk about beating the door down.

This is nothing new.  They did all last year as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Tony-OH changed the title to Heston Kjerstad 2024

Kjerstad's start to this season is exactly why I wanted O'Hearn moved this offseason. Not only is Kjerstad potentially an impact bat at DH/RF/and fill in 1B (He's been better but not great at 1B in Norfolk) he's a better defender in RF than O'Hearn. 

Either way, I'm hoping the Orioles make room for him soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, glenn__davis said:

I'm taking these early Norfolk numbers with a bit of a grain of salt because clearly something isn't normal there, but.... talk about beating the door down.

image.thumb.png.ce60ebb91b4388cd7177c6180b0bb4d6.png

Maybe, but like every game down there, the Tides had the vast majority of the 100 MPH EVs. They 8 of the 11 100 MPH EVs and of course, Kjerstad, Mayo, Holliday and Stowers all were once again on the list. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s interesting with Kjerstad in many ways as the clamor for a call-up should be around him as much as Holiday.  There is really no AAA development left for Heston, he belongs in ML and would upgrade the major league team.   
 

Continue to be confused why Elias is favoring several marginal players for the major league roster, players that cost more and project worse than the major league talent at Norfolk. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Pat Kelly said:

It’s interesting with Kjerstad in many ways as the clamor for a call-up should be around him as much as Holiday.  There is really no AAA development left for Heston, he belongs in ML and would upgrade the major league team.   
 

Continue to be confused why Elias is favoring several marginal players for the major league roster, players that cost more and project worse than the major league talent at Norfolk. 

I think it's clear that Elias values depth in AAA. The problem with that is he values it so much, that he hoards marginal players like O'Hearn, Urias and Mateo as well as major league average players like Hays, Santander and Mountcastle because he can just keep major league ready players in AAA in case they get hurt.

Basically he's think if O'Hearn can give me about what Kjerstad can give me, why not keep both? Now I think Kjerstad is showing he can give more than O'Hearn so at some point, a move will need to be made, but there is that veteranosity stand point and the fact the team is 4-2, even if it took two comeback walk off wins to make them that instead of being 2-4. 

All Kjerstad can do is exactly what he's doing. I hope they continue to give him 1B work because that could very well end up his position if Mayo improves enough to stick at 3B. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, emmett16 said:

This is nothing new.  They did all last year as well. 

No, not like this they didn't.  At least not all at once.  

Again it will obviously level out a bit but these numbers so far are silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

 

Maybe, but like every game down there, the Tides had the vast majority of the 100 MPH EVs. They 8 of the 11 100 MPH EVs and of course, Kjerstad, Mayo, Holliday and Stowers all were once again on the list. 

Oh I don't disagree that they're hitting the ball really hard, but these numbers obviously wont' keep up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing we aren’t talking about here is the game power Kjerstad is showing.

That is something we have seen glimpses of but not much in terms of consistency.

Now obviously he won’t keep this up at this level but this is good to see and hopefully it’s a sign that his game power is back on a more consistent basis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He hit a rope to LC and got robbed by the CF his last time up.  His other out was hit pretty hard up the middle to the SS.  He’s super relaxed and confident and finding the barrel almost every AB.   Not even close to what he looked like in ST.  Looked like he was trying to lift and pull the ball 500 feet each time.   Looking really good.  As Tony said, besides that embarrassing drop on Hollidays lob he looks more comfortable at 1B last game or two.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

The thing we aren’t talking about here is the game power Kjerstad is showing.

That is something we have seen glimpses of but not much in terms of consistency.

Now obviously he won’t keep this up at this level but this is good to see and hopefully it’s a sign that his game power is back on a more consistent basis.

You don't think he's going to hit 109 home runs? 

10 Seinfeld scenes every product manager should watch | by Guy Molho | UX  Collective

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, glenn__davis said:

No, not like this they didn't.  At least not all at once.  

Again it will obviously level out a bit but these numbers so far are silly.

By 4/29 last year they had already had (2) 20+ run games and a 17 run game.   On 4/29 they broke the then franchise hit record. 
 

Folks forget they had Westburg, Ortiz, Cowser, Stowers, Norby & Prieto.  They were a juggernaut.  The line-up was just as potent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

By 4/29 last year they had already had (2) 20+ run games and a 17 run game.   On 4/29 they broke the then franchise hit record. 
 

Folks forget they had Westburg, Ortiz, Cowser, Stowers, Norby & Prieto.  They were a juggernaut.  The line-up was just as potent. 

Maybe, but maybe because it’s the first 6 games, we  never had a group of hitters putting up video numbers at any point.   That was a great lineup too but the current numbers JUMP at you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Adley is having a down year. I believe he will bounce back.
    • I admire those of you who have such confidence in this offense. It’s been absolutely terrible for months, other than the last week of the season. It was beyond terrible yesterday- yes Ragans was good but the approach was awful by every hitter. I’ll be thrilled for them to prove me overly pessimistic, but I have zero faith in these bats.  This is at least partially a defense mechanism. I am not ready for the baseball season to be over, and another terribly quick exit from the postseason would just be so dreadful. I don’t need them to win the WS. But winning one GD game would be nice. Not looking forward to six months without baseball. 
    • You don’t have to twist yourself into a pretzel to defend Hyde. If Santander’s defense costs us, it means we got to extra innings and pinch running for OHearn was the right call. Also, are you really trying to say that OHearn is so valuable a defender at 1B that we couldn’t stand to lose that glove in extras? I doubt he’s even better than Santander. 
    • Here's what people thought a couple weeks ago.   
    • Wieters' bWAR was 13.3 through his first 4 seasons (2009 - 2012).  It ended at 18.3 after his last season in 2020, so he was basically ineffective for the last 8 years of his career. Adley's bWAR is 13.1 through his first 3 seasons. So it isn't like Wieters didn't have a strong start to his career just like Adley did.  I think the concern that folks have is that the rest of Adley's career will play out like the rest of Wieters' career.  It seemed very unlikely halfway through this year, but this has been one hell of a drop-off.   And after Wieters never lived up to expectations, it is definitely a fear that we may be reliving this again.  Let's hope this second half was just an aberration.   
    • Adley has been in a horrible almost 4 month slump. Before that, he was the WAY BETTER offensive player. But I pose this question: What does it matter if Rutschman turns out to be worse than Wieters? Matt Wieters was drafted almost TWENTY YEARS AGO. No one in this org had anything to do with him being on our roster. HEck none of our current front office was even here for his entire Orioles' career.
    • I do feel like Adley is out of shape or at least has gotten more out of shape than usual. That’s part of the reason I think he’s hurt…not working out as much. If he is healthy and the slump is this bad, I’m ok questioning whether or not the new GF(ie the distraction) is part of it. Is he putting everything into the game that he should?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...