Jump to content

Vs. LHP


btdart20

Recommended Posts

On 4/4/2024 at 8:49 AM, sportsfan8703 said:

Hays and Adley should bat 1-2.  Love Gunnar, but bat him 5th or 6th vs lefties.  

Adley/Mounty/Santanader are our big 3 lefty mashers. Hays hits them for power, but has mediocre OBP skills. So he shouldn't be any higher than 5th. Despite Gunnar's majors struggles in his first full season. His OBP was only 20 points less then Hays and the arrow can only point up for him.  Pitchers don't go deep anymore. So don't push your best overall hitters so far down the LU.

Gunnar will draw a ton of walks vs all handed hitters and can only keep improving vs southpaws.

The LU they had against Ragans was about it should be. Westburg and Hays can swap depending on who's hotter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Orioles' splits for 2024 so far:

Against LH -- .236 / .329. / 306  OPS of .635

Against RH -- .248 / .289 / .497  OPS of .786

We're 17/72 with 3 extra base hits against LH pitchers. SSS I know, and at this point one or two games against a dominant starter can skew the numbers. But the Pirates didn't have a dominant lefty on the mound today, and he still held us to one hit and one walk in six innings. Another LH starting against us tomorrow. 

 

For comparison -- Orioles' splits for 2023:

Against LH -- .260 / .334 / .430  OPS of .764

Against RH -- .253 / .316 / 418  OPS of .733

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, ShoelesJoe said:

Orioles' splits for 2024 so far:

Against LH -- .236 / .329. / 306  OPS of .635

Against RH -- .248 / .289 / .497  OPS of .786

We're 17/72 with 3 extra base hits against LH pitchers. SSS I know, and at this point one or two games against a dominant starter can skew the numbers. But the Pirates didn't have a dominant lefty on the mound today, and he still held us to one hit and one walk in six innings. Another LH starting against us tomorrow. 

 

For comparison -- Orioles' splits for 2023:

Against LH -- .260 / .334 / .430  OPS of .764

Against RH -- .253 / .316 / 418  OPS of .733

The numbers are actually much worse after yesterday’s game.  Basically, our guys who normally rake vs. LHP aren’t doing so yet.   But IMO it’s way too early to see it as some big trend.  

For some reason, we just couldn’t square up Falter yesterday.  It’s not like we weren’t making contact, we just weren’t getting the barrel on the ball for whatever reason.  I thought the decision to pull him after 6 very easy innings was absolutely insane.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Frobby said:

The numbers are actually much worse after yesterday’s game.  Basically, our guys who normally rake vs. LHP aren’t doing so yet.   But IMO it’s way too early to see it as some big trend.  

For some reason, we just couldn’t square up Falter yesterday.  It’s not like we weren’t making contact, we just weren’t getting the barrel on the ball for whatever reason.  I thought the decision to pull him after 6 very easy innings was absolutely insane.  
 

Yeah I'm still not sure what Shelton was smoking with that one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I typically watch the game delayed so I can FF through commercials, but Austin Hays ABs have become fast forward TV.

He is completely lost at the plate and he can't seem to find the ball vs LHP or RHP.  The Orioles need him to hit LHP with so many weak bats vs Southpaws.

Right now the Orioles are depending on just a handful of players vs LHP:

Hit LHP well: Mountcastle, Rutschman, Santander, Mateo (Rutschman and Mateo are the only ones with an OBP over .621 coming into Sunday)

The rest of the lineup:

Hays can't hit anyone

Hicks led the team in OPS vs LHP last season but he is gone. 

Gunnar has been terrible vs LHP for 2023-24 (did not look at '22)

As a team, the Orioles are hitting .188/.279/.250/.529 vs LHP through 112 PAs which is NOT nothing 

As the season moves on, the Orioles will add more LHB to this lineup when some of Holliday, Kjerstad, and Stowers are promoted.  This is a team that needs another bat that mashes LHP to protect all of the talented LHH.  If this were Strat-O-Matic, those guys are literally a dime a dozen. Working with the constraints the Oriole have, Norby might be the best option since I think we're past the point of being concerned about service time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Bump…the O’s currently have an .824 OPS against LHP, 2nd best in MLB.  I guess all that handwringing in the first 7-10 days of the season was premature BS.  Gee, who would have guessed?

The O’s face tough lefties the next two days.  Maybe they’ll struggle in these games.  But hitting lefties isn’t and hasn’t been a problem for the O’s the last two years.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

Bump…the O’s currently have an .824 OPS against LHP, 2nd best in MLB.  I guess all that handwringing in the first 7-10 days of the season was premature BS.  Gee, who would have guessed?

The O’s face tough lefties the next two days.  Maybe they’ll struggle in these games.  But hitting lefties isn’t and hasn’t been a problem for the O’s the last two years.

There will still be teeth-gnashing about how soft-tossing lefties kill this team in the game thread tonight if we are slow out of the gate in the next two days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Malike said:

There will still be teeth-gnashing about how soft-tossing lefties kill this team in the game thread tonight if we are slow out of the gate in the next two days.

Personally I wouldn’t call either one a soft tosser.  Abbott averages 93, Lodolo 94.   Each has given us trouble in their one past start against us.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Personally I wouldn’t call either one a soft tosser.  Abbott averages 93, Lodolo 94.   Each has given us trouble in their one past start against us.  

That was exactly my point. If it's a LHP that throws 95, it's a soft-tossing lefty. All lefties are soft-tossing in the game thread.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Roy Firestone said:

Santander and Mullins haven't hit anyone and anything so much...

Santander has a .978 OPS against lefties this season.  He's hitting them very well, and I have no doubt he'll always be in the lineup when facing a lefty.  It's against righties where we'll see more of Kjerstad in RF, though I wouldn't be surprised if Santander goes on a hot streak fairly soon.

Mullins hasn't really hit lefties so far this year.  Against righties he's not terrible but not exactly great either.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And since we're also throwing a lefty today, thought I wd post the stat that Cincinnati has done about the same vs. RHP and LHP (.659/.662 OPS).

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just did a bit of a walk. Some decently large braches down, one segment of privacy fence missing and standing water on the property in a low spot.  
    • Just woke up and I don't hear any wind or rain.
    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...