Jump to content

Cameron Weston 2024


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, HowAboutThat said:

What does “back door” mean? Or “Blackfoot” as in “backfoot slider.”

A back door breaking ball, whether CB or SL, starts as a ball on the opposite batters box and breaks across the plate for a strike. It is said to "go in the back door."

A backfoot breaking ball is one that is targeted at the batters back foot as he stands in the batters box. The ball typically breaks down and in. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, HowAboutThat said:

What does “back door” mean? Or “Blackfoot” as in “backfoot slider.”

To me, when I hear "back foot slider" I think of Steve Carlton's slider to right-handed batters that looked so good to them that they swung at the pitch, but it broke down and in so hard that it would nearly hit the batter's back foot.   When I hear "back door breaking pitch", I think of a pitch that looks outside, but breaks late and nips the back outside corner of the strike zone.  I'm no expert on baseball terminology, but that is what I take those two phrases to mean when I hear them.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Jim'sKid26 said:

A back door breaking ball, whether CB or SL, starts as a ball on the opposite batters box and breaks across the plate for a strike. It is said to "go in the back door."

A backfoot breaking ball is one that is targeted at the batters back foot as he stands in the batters box. The ball typically breaks down and in. 

I thought a back door slider starts way off the plate and just catches the nearest edge of the zone rather than breaking across it. For a RHP to a LHB, this would mean the pitch catches the outside corner. It is "back door" because that is kind of the opposite of how the pitch is typically designed, ie the batter thinks it is in the middle of the zone but it breaks away. If the pitch breaks across the plate, that is an ordinary slider.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Really good numbers for Weston at AA now, a month before his 24th birthday.

60.1 IP

10.44 K/9

2.54 BB/9

44.7 GB%

3.13 ERA

3.30 FIP

3.41 xFIP

Weston, Portes, Gibson, Money, Bragg, Cooper are the under the radar guys (i.e. not Forret and De Leon) putting up good seasons of statistical production for their ages/levels, to varying degrees of success - but Weston is the only one doing it at AA. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
2 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

5 IP 0 ER 6K

Good numbers in AA and the season.

https://www.milb.com/player/cameron-weston-687721

What’s the story on this dude?  Love the 1.00ish WHIP. Our MiLB pitcher of the year?  

I was going to bump this thread last night. Nice bounce back start for him after a meh month for him. 

Yeah, I'd say probably Weston, Van Loon, or Brandon Young for our MiL "Cy Young". 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

I was going to bump this thread last night. Nice bounce back start for him after a meh month for him. 

Yeah, I'd say probably Weston, Van Loon, or Brandon Young for our MiL "Cy Young". 

It seems like Weston, Van Loon, Young, Reilly, and Fruit, are all in the same category of lets hope one of them turns into a back end rotation piece.  Zach Peek, and Ambruester, were guys like that in prior years, but they didn't make it.  MLB rotation pieces, whether back end or not, are so darn expensive in terms of money and/or prospects.  Add those guys to McDermott, and Povich, and you can kind of see what Elias is trying to do.  It's just injuries...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weston’s numbers are really good for a guy in his age 23 season who only had about 70 pro innings before reaching AA. He now has more IP at AA than all other prior levels combined. 

I know he doesn’t wow from a scouting point of view but these AA numbers at his age/experience have the profile of a high probability big leaguer in some capacity. Maybe that’s ultimately only as a RP, particularly given that low arm slot, but potentially a very good one.

I’ll be very interested when he gets to AA and we get the Statcast data. Hoping that at least one of Weston, Pham or Bright gets that bump up before the end of the year. Weston certainly has the best numbers this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like some pretty wicked horizontal movement on the breakers in that clip, and the first one was a changeup that completely fooled that lefty.

Very difficult to throw anything out of that arm slot that is tough on lefties other than the changeup, and Yennier Cano is proof that even a very good changeup is not enough to overcome the platoon issues if your fastball/sinker struggles against lefties.

That said, I suppose Logan Webb is the prototype for how you can still be a starting pitcher with that arm slot and arsenal if the breaking ball/offspeed are good enough and you can command everything.

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

It seems like Weston, Van Loon, Young, Reilly, and Fruit, are all in the same category of lets hope one of them turns into a back end rotation piece.  Zach Peek, and Ambruester, were guys like that in prior years, but they didn't make it.  MLB rotation pieces, whether back end or not, are so darn expensive in terms of money and/or prospects.  Add those guys to McDermott, and Povich, and you can kind of see what Elias is trying to do.  It's just injuries...

I'd have Weston, Young and Reilly as a step above Fruit and Van Loon. Young has the best chance to stick as a starter, Reilly the best chance to be a high impact reliever, and Weston a possibility as a  backend rotation or set up guy similar to Tate. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tough day for Weston, as he allowed 3 hits and 2 walks in 5 innings yet gave up 5 earned runs.  All three hits he allowed were homers, and two of them were immediately after he’d walked a batter.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Tough day for Weston, as he allowed 3 hits and 2 walks in 5 innings yet gave up 5 earned runs.  All three hits he allowed were homers, and two of them were immediately after he’d walked a batter.  

Ouch. He had done very well staying away from allowing homers up until then from what I remember without looking it up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Sosa was much more raw then I was led to believe. MUCH MORE RAW in every aspect of his game.
    • I tend to agree with this and have also always said that the emphasis in the minors could be resulting in giving us false impressions of how good our prospects are.  No one is saying that pitch selection isn't important, but you can afford in the minors to spit on pitches that you are going to have to hit in the majors.  In the minors, lack of command will result in greater results for being selective.  In the majors, guys have enough command to throw what you think are bad pitches in the zone more often.  Our guys get used to not swinging at certain strikes in the minors because they can't do "damage."  There is a good possibility that we are having players narrow the strike zone too much in the minors.  When they get to the majors, they then don't swing at pitches they have to swing at because ML pitchers can consistently throw pitches in that area.  The players then have to unlearn not swinging at such pitches, and also learn how to hit those pitches.  We are seeing this with Gunnar and pitches on the outside part of the zone.  I also think Cowser's offspeed issues are likely related to his approach to just not swing at them as often in the minors.  
    • I really can't argue that overall, though it's really tough to put the winning run on 2nd base with one out. I think the problem with that is Masataka Yoshida was on deck, and while he struggled against lefties overall, he does do a good job of situational hitting.  At the end of the day, I'd feel a lot better pitching to him with only the tying run on 3rd, not the winning run on 2B.
    • The Orioles clearly value the pitcher's splits over the hitter's splits.
    • Tyler O'Neill against lefties: 322 AVG, 760 SLG, 1.200 OPS Yoshida against lefties: 200, 306, 592 O'Neill has average sprint speed, and Yoshida is a below average runner.  Honestly, if you have runners at the corners and 1 out, there isn't much difference with the bases juiced and 1 out up by 1. So, it should only come down to a decision of whether you want to play with the infield in or play at double play depth. It's still unbelievable that they had Akin pitch to O'Neill. Not just because O'Neill is having a dominant season against lefties, but because Akin has a 2 cent head when runners are on base and in high leverage situations. Everything was against Akin w/ O'Neill batting. You can pick your poison with Yoshida. If they PH and put in Refsnyder, then you can go to a different arm. Either way, there's a high run expectancy for that runner on 3rd with 1 out, not so much for the runner on 2nd. It just doesn't make any sense whatsoever to have Akin pitch to O'Neill. I don't care if the winning run is on second. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...