Jump to content

David Rubenstein 2024


Recommended Posts

From Rosenthal’s latest article:

The completion of the Baltimore Orioles’ sale is expected in the “coming days,” according to sources briefed on the process. At that point, the group led by David Rubenstein and Mike Arougheti will close on the remaining 60 percent of the team, valued at approximately $1 billion (the total purchase price was $1.725 billion).

How might all of this impact Orioles general manager Mike Elias at the deadline?

According to Christopher Ullman, a spokesman for Rubenstein, “David would entertain anything that Mike Elias recommends.”

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

From Rosenthal’s latest article:

The completion of the Baltimore Orioles’ sale is expected in the “coming days,” according to sources briefed on the process. At that point, the group led by David Rubenstein and Mike Arougheti will close on the remaining 60 percent of the team, valued at approximately $1 billion (the total purchase price was $1.725 billion).

How might all of this impact Orioles general manager Mike Elias at the deadline?

According to Christopher Ullman, a spokesman for Rubenstein, “David would entertain anything that Mike Elias recommends.”

Throwing t shirts is nice and all, but it’s time to throw that paper around. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Throwing t shirts is nice and all, but it’s time to throw that paper around. 

Sounds like he's waiting for Elias to recommend... anything. 

I worry more and more about Elias' risk aversion. We may have an owner who wants to spend and a GM who doesn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, interloper said:

Sounds like he's waiting for Elias to recommend... anything. 

I worry more and more about Elias' risk aversion. We may have an owner who wants to spend and a GM who doesn't.

I don’t think we’d be limited in pursuing Eovaldi, Eflin, Bassitt, Castillo, Fedde, etc. from a financial perspective.  However, we still need to line up with them on prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, interloper said:

Sounds like he's waiting for Elias to recommend... anything. 

I worry more and more about Elias' risk aversion. We may have an owner who wants to spend and a GM who doesn't.

Least of my worries. We have - I think - an owner that will give his GM a competative budget to work with and let that GM run the team. I do not forsee another Chris Davis situation. May not always agree with Elias but he should have ownerships' trust as long as they see him as best architect for the Orioles. I think Elais will spend if he has the budget and I think he will do so wisely. But that's just my opinion.

Not saying it would, but it would be beyond irony if this board all of a sudden wanted ownership to engage agents and spend without their GM's involvement or get involved in trades other than budgetarily. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love this quote, after he gives a lot of details of things that could be done to upgrade Camden Yards:

“There are  lots of things we can do to make it more appealing to fans. Nothing is more appealing than winning. Otherwise, if we had a bad stadium and we had a great team, people would live with that.”

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

I love this quote, after he gives a lot of details of things that could be done to upgrade Camden Yards:

“There are  lots of things we can do to make it more appealing to fans. Nothing is more appealing than winning. Otherwise, if we had a bad stadium and we had a great team, people would live with that.”

It worked for Memorial Stadium. I recall more than one game — obstructed view behind a column and yet, enjoying a game because the O’s were competitive. That aside, all of DR’s answers were good and more about expectations than anything about himself — winning is what keeps fans happy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/26/2024 at 9:03 AM, Frobby said:

I love this quote, after he gives a lot of details of things that could be done to upgrade Camden Yards:

“There are  lots of things we can do to make it more appealing to fans. Nothing is more appealing than winning. Otherwise, if we had a bad stadium and we had a great team, people would live with that.”

Frobby, you seem to follow the business side of the O’s fairly close.

 

Curious what you think the O’s payroll could get up to and the O’s still break even?

With the caveat you only know what is reported on their financials with most of it being speculation.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/26/2024 at 7:45 AM, interloper said:

Sounds like he's waiting for Elias to recommend... anything. 

I worry more and more about Elias' risk aversion. We may have an owner who wants to spend and a GM who doesn't.

I'm assuming that Elias has done a thorough risk analysis for the way this season has developed. Perhaps determined that after losing Bradish, Means, Wells and Coulombe that there are just too many pitching holes to fill. Keep all the big prospects, let go of Hays, Mullins, Urias, Mateo in the offseason and go with the younguns. 

(just speculation on my part)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I’m sure this question has been asked and answered a few times already, but is it safe to say yet that Eflin has been THE oily variety bohunk starting pitcher moved at the deadline? Is it even close?
    • Game is apparently going to be delayed. 
    • Yeah, it was a glorious first week of the return for Holliday. Since those first 7 games, it’s been a .478 OPS with a K rate north of 30%. That’s “black hole” territory for me. Can’t argue much with your point about big hits — the kid has been timely with the knocks he’s gotten, at least. I just get a little weary of all the “Hyde just wants to play these garbage vets because #veteranosity” stuff. The guys who have been the worst of all are kids we consider The Core: Adley, Holliday, Mayo, and Cowser in any big PA. That (along with the injuries) is what’s really causing this offense to fall short of expectations, not the much-maligned vets that Hyde “loves to play” like Urias, Mullins, Jimenez, Rivera, Slater, McCann, etc. As if Hyde would rather play several waiver-wire nobodies every game rather than just pencil in all the top prospects.
    • I don’t get why we’d want a struggling rookie on the roster in a playoff chase. It would be different if he was a good fielder or base runner. Him being here doesn’t seem to help him or the team. 
    • My best guess is that the crosschecker thought the penalties were bulls*** and didn't penalize him for them fully.   I don't actually think Stanley played bad other than the illegal formation penalties that I really don't think we should be penalizing him for.
    • Top, top post. Thank you for writing this!  Thank god we've won a few games and this place is a bit back to normal. There were a few weeks there where this place was more reactionary than a political debate on twitter.  re: the bolded, I agree, and honestly don't get it. I really don't see any Verdugo - Domínguez parallel here, and it seems a stretch to make one (for the purpose of serving an agenda or confirming a pre-existing bias?). 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...