Jump to content

Rosenthal @ The Athletic: Why top hitting prospects are having a harder transition to the majors than in the past


Recommended Posts

This goes with the tweet I posted yesterday about the quality of fastball Holliday saw.

People laughed and acted like it was some flippant response but it’s true..you can’t learn to hit ML pitching in the minor leagues. You have to see it and adjust to it.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great stuff here. AAA sure sounds like Little League these days. Holliday had the full force of multi-million-dollar analytics systems pointed at him - in the 9-hole for crying out loud. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very informative read. Required for all who think AAA success can automatically translate right away to the majors. I think the part where it says the team must have/be able to afford the time for the player to adjust needs remembering also. Thanks for posting, Moose!

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rookie integration taxes are higher but you gotta pay to play unless you can live with using Adam Frazier or Ramon Urias or Jorge Mateo in October.

I guess Sigbot could check the ask for its kin Alex Bregman if he came to market..

Everybody said what was gonna happen if the Astros didn't win the division...I guess we'll never know!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

This goes with the tweet I posted yesterday about the quality of fastball Holliday saw.

People laughed and acted like it was some flippant response but it’s true..you can’t learn to hit ML pitching in the minor leagues. You have to see it and adjust to it.

The extent of the difference is what I find most surprising. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While all of this sounds true, I wonder what the other side of the equation is. The majors also has all the world's best hitters, with their analytics teams breaking down the opposition pitching. So couldn't you argue that AAA pitchers will have an equally steep adjustment to the majors when they first arrive? It doesn't negate the argument made here, but seems it would duplicate when it comes to young pitchers getting called to the Show. Yet what we hear is only, "The jump from AAA to MLB pitching is the biggest jump in sports."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't read the article, just the snippets in the original post. But I'm guessing there's no study to accompany this, where they show a bunch of statistically significant samples of rookie performance in their first X games in, say, the 1970s, 80s, 90s, 2000s, and then compare the data to the 2020s with a clear trend line that it really is more difficult to break in today?

Because without that, this is more-or-less a fluff piece speculating on the causes of an effect that nobody has shown to actually be true.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, now said:

While all of this sounds true, I wonder what the other side of the equation is. The majors also has all the world's best hitters, with their analytics teams breaking down the opposition pitching. So couldn't you argue that AAA pitchers will have an equally steep adjustment to the majors when they first arrive? It doesn't negate the argument made here, but seems it would duplicate when it comes to young pitchers getting called to the Show. Yet what we hear is only, "The jump from AAA to MLB pitching is the biggest jump in sports."

Remember when expansion supposedly diluted pitching? When I'd ask why expansion didn't dilute hitting just as much the answer was usually something along the lines of "well, it's obvious that there are all kinds of effects that the scarcity of pitching shows that there's just more hitters in the pipeline and kids these days can't see that the training and stuff isn't like the ways that the people did it back in the 50s and all that... yea."

Until someone shows me relevant data confirming Rosenthal's hypothesis I'm going to assume he has no idea if it's true or not. But his article will now be cited as evidence by any number of people who claim it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

This goes with the tweet I posted yesterday about the quality of fastball Holliday saw.

People laughed and acted like it was some flippant response but it’s true..you can’t learn to hit ML pitching in the minor leagues. You have to see it and adjust to it.

Which is something some of us have been saying this whole time.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Which is something some of us have been saying this whole time.

 

Has anyone ever said that you can learn to hit ML pitching in the minors?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The point Elias made about the quality of advance scouting and game-planning made a lot of sense to me.   There’s not much incentive to invest in that at the AAA level.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

This article confirms my suspicions that any pitcher worth a damn isn't going to be wasting away in AAA ball. Adley and Gunnar both went through their own adjustment periods. Ultimately once Holliday has the mechanics of his swing worked out he needs to be called up because the only way to hit against MLB pitchers is to face MLB pitchers.

 

 

Edited by OsFanSinceThe80s
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

 

https://theathletic.com/5481059/2024/05/09/mlb-top-hitting-prospects-majors/

I probably should have bumped the Jackson Holliday thread with this, after all the article leads off with a picture of him.

Obviously can't post the whole thing, but it's a decent read.  I'm including the Elias quotes, anything Orioles related and any other good points.

Also, there's no mention of leg kicks.  Anywhere.  No mention of leg kicks being a problem for transitioning to the majors.

 

 

 

No leg kicks mentioned!  

Good post.   Makes sense.

 

In JH's case, I do think the leg kick has something to do with it.   And it goes back to the first quote in the OP about velocity.   In the majors there is just more of it.  You don't have near as much time (baseball speaking) to decide whether to swing or not.  So the timing with the leg kick may work in the minors where velocity is less, but in the majors he may be a tad slow with it compared to the speed of the pitches he is seeing.

Looks like he is back into the swing of things at Norfolk so lets hope he made an adjustment and will be back up at some point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...