Jump to content

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, Rbiggs2525 said:

The Orioles tend to like size with there high picks. This is something I will keep an eye on.

Rutschman, Kjerstad, Cowser = big guys

Holliday and Bradfield = not big guys

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, RZNJ said:

Rutschman, Kjerstad, Cowser = big guys

Holliday and Bradfield = not big guys

I was going farther than that, Beavers, Westburg, Gunnar, Wagner.  Basically until the second round they like larger players. I also think Holliday will be 6’0 200 lbs when all said and done which is big for a SS/2B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Rbiggs2525 said:

I was going farther than that, Beavers, Westburg, Gunnar, Wagner.  Basically until the second round they like larger players. I also think Holliday will be 6’0 200 lbs when all said and done which is big for a SS/2B.

Is Holliday actually 6’?  I saw him play a few times last year in Bowie and he looked about 5’10.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OriolesUpAndDowns said:

Is Holliday actually 6’?  I saw him play a few times last year in Bowie and he looked about 5’10.  

Not sure but most reasonable people would not call him a big guy.  Bradfield not a big guy.  Norby not a big guy.  It just so happens that 80% of top draft prospects are probably big guys.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

Not sure but most reasonable people would not call him a big guy.  Bradfield not a big guy.  Norby not a big guy.  It just so happens that 80% of top draft prospects are probably big guys.    

Agree.  It’s almost universal amongst all sports that size is valued when evaluating amateurs for projection.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We’ve been picking really athletic types when not picking high in rd 1. Position player wise.  

2023 - EBJ, Horvath, Josenberger, Cunningham, Etzel

Not that are prior picks haven’t been athletic, if you know what I’m trying to say. We don’t take plodders as position players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/30/2024 at 1:27 PM, cnmilton said:

I really like Brody Brecht.  If he is there when the O's pick, I really hope he is the choice. He adds an element to the Os system that is currently lacking, imo. 

 

If the Os can help him with his command and control, he could be a special pitcher. Very high risk, very high reward

Brecht has TOR upside.  We’re good at finding #3-#5 types just in developing them, but we need that TOR arm upside and develop. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will be disappointed if we don't load up heavy on pitching in this draft.  Hopefully there is someone that Elias likes in the 1st round that might join the rotation in a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Go_Os said:

I will be disappointed if we don't load up heavy on pitching in this draft.  Hopefully there is someone that Elias likes in the 1st round that might join the rotation in a year.

We definitely need to load up on pitching depth in this year's draft also.  However, I'd still prefer to avoid pitchers in the first round.  That 1st round pick is too important to risk it on the fickleness of young pitchers.  But 2nd round and beyond, let's grab a bunch of pitchers.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, Otter said:

We definitely need to load up on pitching depth in this year's draft also.  However, I'd still prefer to avoid pitchers in the first round.  That 1st round pick is too important to risk it on the fickleness of young pitchers.  But 2nd round and beyond, let's grab a bunch of pitchers.  

We need a potential ace.  Many of the top starters were 1st round picks.

Edited by Go_Os
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today I learned Jurrangelo Cijntje is a switch-pitcher.

On the ESPN Sunday Night pregame, Kiley McDaniel just named the Orioles as one of a few late 1st round teams as possibilities.

Apart from the novelty, McDaniel added he is a 1st round talent "just" as a RHP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

Today I learned Jurrangelo Cijntje is a switch-pitcher.

On the ESPN Sunday Night pregame, Kiley McDaniel just named the Orioles as one of a few late 1st round teams as possibilities.

Apart from the novelty, McDaniel added he is a 1st round talent "just" as a RHP.

I think he’s seen as a relief only prospect as a lefty. He could potentially be used both ways in the minor and throw some innings between starts….maybe. But I’d be absolutely stunned if the orioles picked him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, WI O’s Fan said:

After watching Masn’s interview with Sid, no way the Orioles take Brecht or Honeycutt with 22 or 32. 

 

Do you expect them to gush over a guy they really want at 22 and let other teams know? I would be surprised if we took Brecht, but mostly due to our lack of taking pitchers in the top 2 rounds (excluding comp b last year) and his command concerns.

Honeycutt feels pretty in line with our pick of bradfield last year…a guy with at least two well above average traits that make them stand out (speed and defense for bradfield, speed power defense and arm for Honeycutt, tho maybe not as elite in the specific tools) who didn’t quite put together their potential in their last year or two of college and falls a bit for it (he’s still mostly mocked to be gone before we pick). If they think they can fix the hit tool even to 45 or so he’s a sure fire major leaguer due to the other tools with huge upside. 
 

like bradfield, Honeycutt kind of feels like he could have a floor somewhere near Mateo as long as he can hit even a bit. Largely considered a great center fielder with a plus arm, plus speed and plenty of power? 

Edited by OsFanInOhio
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I thought Chisholm missed home too. They didn’t appeal tho I don’t think.
    • Now run scores and Yanks take lead. 
    • Inexcusable missed call in NY. Review Cleo at showed Chisholm out at 2nd. They upheld safe call. 
    • Well, good on posters who proved the SSS side of "Guards Ball." I just found it striking in terms of the narrative in that article, which was basically the same as what most around here were complaining the O's lacked: clutch hitting, passing the baton, aggressive running, getting runners in from third, etc. I guess the real bottom line is "whatever works." Which of course varies from case to case. The old Bill James postseason wisdom was that HRs are the ticket, since you face good pitching and get so few hits. So back to you, Elias, keep crunching those numbers...
    • First, the had a jump in 23’ given how terrible they had been previously, which conditions many fans in the marketplace not to care. They simple weren’t relevant for years. So one very good regular season will not undue years of being bad/irrelevant and treating your customers terribly. Next, I think they missed an opportunity in the offseason by not doing enough by way of big/bold attention grabbing moves. Now I acknowledge that this was most likely due to the ownership flux/transition. I believe they got an attendance/marketplace engagement boost when they changed owners and when they traded for Burnes. However, I believe we would have seen more engagement attendance with say a big Gunnar extension and/or bringing in a big time FA.   IMO this would have created more buzz before the season (say around the time people make season tix decisions - IMO before Christmas is when some people make those bigger purchases). All of this is to say, that it will take time and effort on the organizations part because of how bad of a stain that the Angeloses left. I still have friends and colleagues who refuse to support the Orioles and attend games due to the damage that was done. Rubenstien & co are not going to be able to undo 30 years of awfulness overnight. But IMO it is not enough to simply call it “a new chapter”. They have to make new/different actions to distinguish themselves from who the Orioles were/used to be under the Angelos regime.
    • Just checking in on Gameday, Yankees looking incredibly vulnerable.  Should be the Os out there.  Super lame.  Whichever team wins this series I hope gets knocked out by CLE or DET.
    • If the franchise were better, the fan base would be too.  It’s been a rough 40 years.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...