Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, PeteCanes said:

You want them to draft baseball players based on need?  That’s based.  

Honestly? When you completely ignore half the game of baseball like the Orioles have been doing with pitching, yes.

We're buried in position players and there were some perfectly great options available there. It's not like Brecht or Caminiti were reaches there.

And what really gets me is Brecht was available with their second pick, but apparently we needed Cayden Greiner 2.0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ChosenOne21 said:

Honestly? When you completely ignore half the game of baseball like the Orioles have been doing with pitching, yes.

We're buried in position players and there were some perfectly great options available there. It's not like Brecht or Caminiti were reaches there.

And what really gets me is Brecht was available with their second pick, but apparently we needed Cayden Greiner 2.0

They don't ignore it, they drafted a ton of pitchers last year, they ignore it in the first/comp rounds, it appears.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wondering about why not select pitchers, it sometimes has to do with how talented the year’s draft is overall. Doesn’t make sense to select a pitcher just for the sake of it, if there’s really no talent there to choose from.

Here’s a little blurb from Fangraphs about this year’s draft class that kinda reflects this:

IMG_6161.jpeg.1942b543fad5561853905ff0eb07c22c.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ChosenOne21 said:

Honestly? When you completely ignore half the game of baseball like the Orioles have been doing with pitching, yes.

Yeah, but if you've been paying attention (clearly, you have been) it's apparent as to what they're doing.

Pitching is harder to draft and develop, O'Dowd said it on the broadcast himself.  

It's very simple:  the Orioles want to hit on as many draft picks as they possibly can.  That's it, that's the entire goal.  Not to draft for a need.

And to do that, in order to stack the decks in their favor, they're going to take hitters.  And they're going to develop hitters.  

And then they're going to trade for pitchers like Corbin Burnes, a guy you can get for a year without having to give up your absolute elite talent.  

If anyone here has been paying attention to what Elias does and what Elias believes in, the goal is to maximize talent and retain payroll flexibility.  They're not going to give massive contracts for a pitcher only to have that pitcher on the IL for 18 months while they recover from TJ.  

Draft the bats, buy some of the pitching for not a lot of time so you're not caught giving 20-30 million a year to a guy who's on the shelf.  Some will call that risk adverse but in the MLB landscape today, I don't mind a team trying to navigate payroll and navigate landing on an expensive guy who needs TJ.  Let the Yankees do that.

This all ignores the international scouting and draft.  IIRC, you can probably get more arms for cheaper that way and hopefully hit on some lottery tickets.  I wouldn't be surprised if pitchers come through the system that don't come from the draft but do come from efforts in South America.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When we look back in 1-2 years there’s going to be a ton of misses after pick 10.   I’m not crazy about either pick but it all comes down to actual performance.  According to the MLB show everyone is great and almost every team made a great pick.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moose Milligan said:

Yeah, but if you've been paying attention (clearly, you have been) it's apparent as to what they're doing.

Pitching is harder to draft and develop, O'Dowd said it on the broadcast himself.  

It's very simple:  the Orioles want to hit on as many draft picks as they possibly can.  That's it, that's the entire goal.  Not to draft for a need.

And to do that, in order to stack the decks in their favor, they're going to take hitters.  And they're going to develop hitters.  

And then they're going to trade for pitchers like Corbin Burnes, a guy you can get for a year without having to give up your absolute elite talent.  

If anyone here has been paying attention to what Elias does and what Elias believes in, the goal is to maximize talent and retain payroll flexibility.  They're not going to give massive contracts for a pitcher only to have that pitcher on the IL for 18 months while they recover from TJ.  

Draft the bats, buy some of the pitching for not a lot of time so you're not caught giving 20-30 million a year to a guy who's on the shelf.  Some will call that risk adverse but in the MLB landscape today, I don't mind a team trying to navigate payroll and navigate landing on an expensive guy who needs TJ.  Let the Yankees do that.

This all ignores the international scouting and draft.  IIRC, you can probably get more arms for cheaper that way and hopefully hit on some lottery tickets.  I wouldn't be surprised if pitchers come through the system that don't come from the draft but do come from efforts in South America.

 

This works as long as you are willing to spend on pitching. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ChosenOne21 said:

Yeah, and how's that working out for them?

It's been a year, who do you think I am, Kreskin?

Oh, you think guys drafted in 2023 should all be contributing in 2024, you were serious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moose Milligan said:

Yeah, but if you've been paying attention (clearly, you have been) it's apparent as to what they're doing.

Pitching is harder to draft and develop, O'Dowd said it on the broadcast himself.  

It's very simple:  the Orioles want to hit on as many draft picks as they possibly can.  That's it, that's the entire goal.  Not to draft for a need.

And to do that, in order to stack the decks in their favor, they're going to take hitters.  And they're going to develop hitters.  

And then they're going to trade for pitchers like Corbin Burnes, a guy you can get for a year without having to give up your absolute elite talent.  

If anyone here has been paying attention to what Elias does and what Elias believes in, the goal is to maximize talent and retain payroll flexibility.  They're not going to give massive contracts for a pitcher only to have that pitcher on the IL for 18 months while they recover from TJ.  

Draft the bats, buy some of the pitching for not a lot of time so you're not caught giving 20-30 million a year to a guy who's on the shelf.  Some will call that risk adverse but in the MLB landscape today, I don't mind a team trying to navigate payroll and navigate landing on an expensive guy who needs TJ.  Let the Yankees do that.

This all ignores the international scouting and draft.  IIRC, you can probably get more arms for cheaper that way and hopefully hit on some lottery tickets.  I wouldn't be surprised if pitchers come through the system that don't come from the draft but do come from efforts in South America.

 

Fine. I'll eat my hat if they actually clear this logjam for good pitching at the deadline.

That said, at what point do you look at the state of organizational pitching and say, "Hey, this isn't working." Teams don't seem to be falling over themselves to trade top tier pitching for a couple of outfield prospects, even good ones. Heck, we couldn't even get Burnes without giving up pitching talent.

Teams seem to want pitching to trade pitching. If you don't have much in the way of pitching to begin with...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Yeah, but if you've been paying attention (clearly, you have been) it's apparent as to what they're doing.

Pitching is harder to draft and develop, O'Dowd said it on the broadcast himself.  

It's very simple:  the Orioles want to hit on as many draft picks as they possibly can.  That's it, that's the entire goal.  Not to draft for a need.

And to do that, in order to stack the decks in their favor, they're going to take hitters.  And they're going to develop hitters.  

And then they're going to trade for pitchers like Corbin Burnes, a guy you can get for a year without having to give up your absolute elite talent.  

If anyone here has been paying attention to what Elias does and what Elias believes in, the goal is to maximize talent and retain payroll flexibility.  They're not going to give massive contracts for a pitcher only to have that pitcher on the IL for 18 months while they recover from TJ.  

Draft the bats, buy some of the pitching for not a lot of time so you're not caught giving 20-30 million a year to a guy who's on the shelf.  Some will call that risk adverse but in the MLB landscape today, I don't mind a team trying to navigate payroll and navigate landing on an expensive guy who needs TJ.  Let the Yankees do that.

This all ignores the international scouting and draft.  IIRC, you can probably get more arms for cheaper that way and hopefully hit on some lottery tickets.  I wouldn't be surprised if pitchers come through the system that don't come from the draft but do come from efforts in South America.

 

But you have to give up 12 years of service time for one year.

That's not sustainable in the long run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

But you have to give up 12 years of service time for one year.

That's not sustainable in the long run.

I don't know if they're going to do that every year.  But I think if there's another guy in a year or two that's like Burnes, they'll do it again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I think it's because Pivetta has reverse splits this year. Now, do you value his career numbers or this year...I'm not sure. But maybe SIGBOT cares about this year more maybe because of pitch mix/effectiveness can vary year to year. Who knows. Against righties: .279/.311/.514 - .825 OPS Lefties: .187/.251/.365 - .616 OPS  
    • So he has the same first 6 hitters and plays Rivera over Mayo who has hit better and is a much better defender along with playing Slater in the outfield which gives us better defense over Santander and takes McCann a light hitting catcher out of the game.  So he made an upgrade at 3rd base with how both guys are playing and flipped Slater for McCann and thus makes it an awful lineup.  It makes me laugh how much people get upset about nothing.  
    • Coulombe doesn't have righty/lefty splits. It's why he is so damn good.  Akin doesn't have righty/lefty splits this year, and he didn't last year but he was awful/hurt. He definitely did in 2022. But he stinks with runners on and in high leverage situations. Soto is super inconsistent and when he blows up he's awful. Last year he stunk against righties, but was excellent against lefties. I reckon they want him to get back to that. To me, the pecking order would be this: Coulombe and Perez for high leverage situations Akin only in for fresh innings and to give 1-2 IP. Soto I just don't trust. He had a nice stretch there for a minute, but in the end...he was pitching in mostly low leverage situations. 
    • Last night's lineup was Hyde first decent lineup in a long time, but tonight's lineup is another abysmal one from him. If Elias was going to make a dumpster dive trade for Austin Slater, I can somewhat see the logic behind strictly using Slater as a platoon player. But I definitely don't understand giving him more starts against righties. What both Elias and Hyde are saying by giving Slater opportunities is, "We don't care about stats or splits, we have a good feeling about this guy." That's it, and that's terrible roster management.  Slater has extreme favorable career splits against lefties, and the Elias apologists on this board pointed to Slater being a good platoon matchup hitter against lefties, saying he makes some sense if you believe his struggles against lefties this season would normalize closer to his career line. Yet Slater is still actually hitting better against righties this season. Ultimately, in the end, Slater is a .600 OPS hitter overall this season. Which makes him unplayable to any competent manager or GM. There was a reason Slater was available at the trade deadline for cash considerations. And it's because he sucks. Emmanuel Rivera, meanwhile, has a .597 OPS this season. Sorry, not even a gold glove 3B is worth rostering with that kind of bat. Yet Hyde continues to give Rivera at bats over a top 10 prospect who should be getting as many starts as possible to get comfortable. Unbelievable.  Slater and Rivera could each hit a home run tonight, and that still wouldn't change how terrible they are or that it's bad lineup optimization to start both of these bums. 
    • Right. Let's just be honest and say that he did a great job building the farm system through the Houston "tank" philosophy, but now must prove he can be good at building the MLB product. But yes, this trade looks dreadful at the moment. 
    • I still expect him to be a very good player.   However, I was hoping for 70 grade bat-to-ball and instead he had a 21.8% in-zone whiff % at Norfolk.  His Tides OPS was powered by a 20% walk rate which won’t stick at the big league level.  I was hoping for solid SS defense and plus 2B defense, but it looks more like solid at 2B and maybe not viable at SS. Going into the season I was hoping for perennial MVP candidate and now have tempered my outlook to occasional All-Star.  I recognize he is 20 but so are the other Jackson’s.
    • Billy Rowell.  Should be capping off a hall of fame career by now but he’s smoking pot and collecting shopping carts at a Food Lion in Jersey.  Jokes aside, De Leon was a guy I had hopes for headed into the season cause we’re thin with pitching.  I thought Beavers was going to be a solid prospect. Mayo for looking completely lost when arriving in Baltimore. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...