Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Malike said:

It's been a year, who do you think I am, Kreskin?

Oh, you think guys drafted in 2023 should all be contributing in 2024, you were serious.

I think they should have at least developed one average reliever in five years of drafting. Not a huge ask. Obviously the book isn't written on their most recent drafts. Forret looks great, but he's a long way off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ChosenOne21 said:

Fine. I'll eat my hat if they actually clear this logjam for good pitching at the deadline.

That said, at what point do you look at the state of organizational pitching and say, "Hey, this isn't working." Teams don't seem to be falling over themselves to trade top tier pitching for a couple of outfield prospects, even good ones. Heck, we couldn't even get Burnes without giving up pitching talent.

Teams seem to want pitching to trade pitching. If you don't have much in the way of pitching to begin with...

We let go of DL Hall and we're not reeling because of it.  Last I heard, it's not like DL Hall is doing great things in Milwaukee, either.

If we've got to trade Povich or McDermott this offseason in a package to get a #1 or #2 starter for a year or two, is anyone really upset about it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Moose Milligan said:

I don't know if they're going to do that every year.  But I think if there's another guy in a year or two that's like Burnes, they'll do it again.

Sure, and they should.

But it's not a sustainable way to build a team.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ChosenOne21 said:

I think they should have at least developed one average reliever in five years of drafting. Not a huge ask. Obviously the book isn't written on their most recent drafts. Forret looks great, but he's a long way off.

Zach Showalter got us Flaherty at the deadline. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Moose Milligan said:

We let go of DL Hall and we're not reeling because of it.  Last I heard, it's not like DL Hall is doing great things in Milwaukee, either.

If we've got to trade Povich or McDermott this offseason in a package to get a #1 or #2 starter for a year or two, is anyone really upset about it?

Really upset? No. But it's kind of like taking two steps forward and one step back.

I'm just saying it's much harder to build a critical mass of good to decent pitching when you have to trade some to get some.

We're not reeling because we don't have DL Hall, and honestly this year couldn't have gone worse for him. Would he have had a better year in our bullpen than Milwaukee's rotation? Maybe. Is he a talented pitcher? Yes, absolutely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ChosenOne21 said:

I feel like I'm a broken record here.

Yes, and how did that work out?

I think we'd all like that deal back.

I think there is enough RP on the waiver wire and rule 5 draft they don't think they need to draft RP's in the draft as a priority.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ChosenOne21 said:

Really upset? No. But it's kind of like taking two steps forward and one step back.

I'm just saying it's much harder to build a critical mass of good to decent pitching when you have to trade some to get some.

We're not reeling because we don't have DL Hall, and honestly this year couldn't have gone worse for him. Would he have had a better year in our bullpen than Milwaukee's rotation? Maybe. Is he a talented pitcher? Yes, absolutely.

Yeah, so you let other organizations make the mistakes of drafting pitching and having it not work out.

Let your competitors make the mistakes.  In this case, the mistakes are drafting pitchers high in the draft, spending money on them and not having a lot of them work out.  Or spending several hundred million in free agency to have a guy get TJ.  

If you have to trade for a pitcher, you at least know the guy coming back is a proven commodity.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I think it's because Pivetta has reverse splits this year. Now, do you value his career numbers or this year...I'm not sure. But maybe SIGBOT cares about this year more maybe because of pitch mix/effectiveness can vary year to year. Who knows. Against righties: .279/.311/.514 - .825 OPS Lefties: .187/.251/.365 - .616 OPS  
    • So he has the same first 6 hitters and plays Rivera over Mayo who has hit better and is a much better defender along with playing Slater in the outfield which gives us better defense over Santander and takes McCann a light hitting catcher out of the game.  So he made an upgrade at 3rd base with how both guys are playing and flipped Slater for McCann and thus makes it an awful lineup.  It makes me laugh how much people get upset about nothing.  
    • Coulombe doesn't have righty/lefty splits. It's why he is so damn good.  Akin doesn't have righty/lefty splits this year, and he didn't last year but he was awful/hurt. He definitely did in 2022. But he stinks with runners on and in high leverage situations. Soto is super inconsistent and when he blows up he's awful. Last year he stunk against righties, but was excellent against lefties. I reckon they want him to get back to that. To me, the pecking order would be this: Coulombe and Perez for high leverage situations Akin only in for fresh innings and to give 1-2 IP. Soto I just don't trust. He had a nice stretch there for a minute, but in the end...he was pitching in mostly low leverage situations. 
    • Last night's lineup was Hyde first decent lineup in a long time, but tonight's lineup is another abysmal one from him. If Elias was going to make a dumpster dive trade for Austin Slater, I can somewhat see the logic behind strictly using Slater as a platoon player. But I definitely don't understand giving him more starts against righties. What both Elias and Hyde are saying by giving Slater opportunities is, "We don't care about stats or splits, we have a good feeling about this guy." That's it, and that's terrible roster management.  Slater has extreme favorable career splits against lefties, and the Elias apologists on this board pointed to Slater being a good platoon matchup hitter against lefties, saying he makes some sense if you believe his struggles against lefties this season would normalize closer to his career line. Yet Slater is still actually hitting better against righties this season. Ultimately, in the end, Slater is a .600 OPS hitter overall this season. Which makes him unplayable to any competent manager or GM. There was a reason Slater was available at the trade deadline for cash considerations. And it's because he sucks. Emmanuel Rivera, meanwhile, has a .597 OPS this season. Sorry, not even a gold glove 3B is worth rostering with that kind of bat. Yet Hyde continues to give Rivera at bats over a top 10 prospect who should be getting as many starts as possible to get comfortable. Unbelievable.  Slater and Rivera could each hit a home run tonight, and that still wouldn't change how terrible they are or that it's bad lineup optimization to start both of these bums. 
    • Right. Let's just be honest and say that he did a great job building the farm system through the Houston "tank" philosophy, but now must prove he can be good at building the MLB product. But yes, this trade looks dreadful at the moment. 
    • I still expect him to be a very good player.   However, I was hoping for 70 grade bat-to-ball and instead he had a 21.8% in-zone whiff % at Norfolk.  His Tides OPS was powered by a 20% walk rate which won’t stick at the big league level.  I was hoping for solid SS defense and plus 2B defense, but it looks more like solid at 2B and maybe not viable at SS. Going into the season I was hoping for perennial MVP candidate and now have tempered my outlook to occasional All-Star.  I recognize he is 20 but so are the other Jackson’s.
    • Billy Rowell.  Should be capping off a hall of fame career by now but he’s smoking pot and collecting shopping carts at a Food Lion in Jersey.  Jokes aside, De Leon was a guy I had hopes for headed into the season cause we’re thin with pitching.  I thought Beavers was going to be a solid prospect. Mayo for looking completely lost when arriving in Baltimore. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...