Jump to content

Heston Kjerstad 2024


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Roy Firestone said:

I want to be clear that Im very aware that Bochy walking Kjerstad  to load the bases was a somewhat routine strategy. Its an obvious attempt to get a force or double play.. I understand that.. But I still had a small smile on my face when they walked him to load the bases, that this kid, with less than 30 MLB at bats is already creating a buzz around baseball, and that grand slam HR , his second HR in a week, was a "respect" moment. I have seen some  players with great starts, swoon, and some never recover. I dont feel that way about this guy. He looks nothing like a rookie or a very very young player.He is patient, never overswings, knows the strike zone, hits the ball with authority even in outs...and seems to really love to play. I think he's a keeper for sure, and just maybe a budding major star. My God, what talent we have. Now if we can just get some pitching, this is gonna be a fun summer. It already is. Heston Kjerstad is must see TV. I think he's gonna be a monster.

Kjerstad does not have that rookie look to him like Cowser last year or Holliday this year. Looks like a professional, seasoned baseball player up there. I expect we'll see the same from Mayo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, interloper said:

Kjerstad does not have that rookie look to him like Cowser last year or Holliday this year. Looks like a professional, seasoned baseball player up there. I expect we'll see the same from Mayo. 

Kjerstad is 25yrs old, same as Westy and just one year younger than Adley.  And he is displaying that level of maturity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, PHRESH said:

I think it's going to be shocking whenever a deal goes down. I've really grown to like most of the guys on this team and I'm very intrigued by many of the guys down on the farm. It could certainly be a Mountcastle, O'Hearn, Santander, etc. Or maybe one of the top three prospects. I just hope the return is worth it. Yeah, do not envy ME's job, but it is certainly important he pull the right strings this year. 

 

Santander's not going anywhere. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it kind of funny how one our prospects will have 2-3 good games and suddenly everyone jumps on the bandwagon.   Kyle Stowers had a .924 OPS as of the end of May and he was briefly everybody’s darling.  Now it’s Kjerstad.   There’s a New Kid in Town!

Don’t get me wrong, there’s lots to like about Kjerstad.   It just amuses me the way enthusiasm waxes and wanes based on microsamples.   

  • Upvote 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I find it kind of funny how one our prospects will have 2-3 good games and suddenly everyone jumps on the bandwagon.   Kyle Stowers had a .924 OPS as of the end of May and he was briefly everybody’s darling.  Now it’s Kjerstad.   There’s a New Kid in Town!

Don’t get me wrong, there’s lots to like about Kjerstad.   It just amuses me the way enthusiasm waxes and wanes based on microsamples.   

That, my good man, is called being a fan.

I did not intend that to rhyme. It just organically happened. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/30/2024 at 2:07 PM, ORIOLE33 said:

 

Santander's not going anywhere. 

I think Santander is a big piece to our lineup and I don't want to see him go anywhere, in fact I would like to see him extended.  However if we are operating like a small market team like Tampa Bay (not sure what we are operating like under new ownership)... wouldn't Santander be the exact guy Elias would trade this deadline since his contract is expiring? Can a small market team like the Orioles just let a Santander walk for free and get nothing at the end of the season?

I don't want to trade him but I wouldn't definitively say he isn't going anywhere. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I find it kind of funny how one our prospects will have 2-3 good games and suddenly everyone jumps on the bandwagon.   Kyle Stowers had a .924 OPS as of the end of May and he was briefly everybody’s darling.  Now it’s Kjerstad.   There’s a New Kid in Town!

Don’t get me wrong, there’s lots to like about Kjerstad.   It just amuses me the way enthusiasm waxes and wanes based on microsamples.   

I can't lie I have changed positions on trading Kjerstad over the past week but I think he looks like a lot more adequate defender in the OF this go around in the MLB than he did before.  I was open to trading him because he looked like a guy who would hit but be primarily a DH, now he looks like a solid corner OF who can hit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I find it kind of funny how one our prospects will have 2-3 good games and suddenly everyone jumps on the bandwagon.   Kyle Stowers had a .924 OPS as of the end of May and he was briefly everybody’s darling.  Now it’s Kjerstad.   There’s a New Kid in Town!

Don’t get me wrong, there’s lots to like about Kjerstad.   It just amuses me the way enthusiasm waxes and wanes based on microsamples.   

Yea I have noticed that as well.  Don’t worry though, if Seattle pitching eats him up, people will say he’s no good and then you can complain about them jumping off the bandwagon.  😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Yea I have noticed that as well.  Don’t worry though, if Seattle pitching eats him up, people will say he’s no good and then you can complain about them jumping off the bandwagon.  😂

I’ll be sure to do that, though hopefully he won’t give anyone a reason to jump off.

It’s kind of interesting to compare his power to Cowser’s.   Cowser has the type where when he really barrels it up, he absolutely destroys a ball, often 440 feet or more.  But Kjerstad has the type where he can hit homers even when he gets a little under the ball.  You initially don’t think it will carry, and then it clears the fence rather easily.   I don’t see that with Cowser, he has less margin for error.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I’ll be sure to do that, though hopefully he won’t give anyone a reason to jump off.

It’s kind of interesting to compare his power to Cowser’s.   Cowser has the type where when he really barrels it up, he absolutely destroys a ball, often 440 feet or more.  But Kjerstad has the type where he can hit homers even when he gets a little under the ball.  You initially don’t think it will carry, and then it clears the fence rather easily.   I don’t see that with Cowser, he has less margin for error.   

The discussion in the offseason was, if you trade one, who do you trade.

I kept going back and forth on the answer but my ultimate thought process was that Cowser is the better all around player but Kjerstad’s best tool, his power, is better than any single tool Cowser has.

I still basically stand by that thought. 
 

This is a long winded way of saying Kjerstad’s power is just better than Cowser’s, so he definitely can get away with things that Cowser can’t.

You have pointed out a lot of warning track outs for Cowser. I would suspect many of those would be homers off of Kjerstad’s bat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

The discussion in the offseason was, if you trade one, who do you trade.

I kept going back and forth on the answer but my ultimate thought process was that Cowser is the better all around player but Kjerstad’s best tool, his power, is better than any single tool Cowser has.

I still basically stand by that thought. 
 

This is a long winded way of saying Kjerstad’s power is just better than Cowser’s, so he definitely can get away with things that Cowser can’t.

You have pointed out a lot of warning track outs for Cowser. I would suspect many of those would be homers off of Kjerstad’s bat.

It’s a tough call, mostly because Cowser’s hit tool isn’t quite as good as I expected, though he may make more contact with experience.  I like both players and they bring different things to the table.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I’ll be sure to do that, though hopefully he won’t give anyone a reason to jump off.

It’s kind of interesting to compare his power to Cowser’s.   Cowser has the type where when he really barrels it up, he absolutely destroys a ball, often 440 feet or more.  But Kjerstad has the type where he can hit homers even when he gets a little under the ball.  You initially don’t think it will carry, and then it clears the fence rather easily.   I don’t see that with Cowser, he has less margin for error.   

Let’s see Kjerstad barrel one up and hit it 440 and then we’ll talk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It’s a tough call, mostly because Cowser’s hit tool isn’t quite as good as I expected, though he may make more contact with experience.  I like both players and they bring different things to the table.  

Neither player is a finished product and I think people tend to forget that.

Luckily we don’t have to choose…we just keep them both.

The single biggest question mark for either was could Kjerstad play in the OF?  I think he can. I’m not worried about it. I still want Mayo to play some RF but I don’t see any reason why Kjerstad should have to be at first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RZNJ said:

Let’s see Kjerstad barrel one up and hit it 440 and then we’ll talk.

I remember his first HR in the AFL was a prodigious distance.  Couldn’t give you a number.  I’d say Cowser has hit at least 5-6 homers that traveled 440-450 over the last two years if you include the minors and spring training.   Like I said, he can absolutely destroy a ball when he gets all of it.  He just doesn’t seem to get the same carry on the “just missed it” balls that Kjerstad does.   Maybe it’s due to the backspin on the ball they generate, or length of swing or something.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • He is such an interesting case. Obviously the extraordinarily late “breakout” age, but you also just almost never see a true one-pitch pitcher in today’s game. Aside from the splitter, he has no ML-quality pitches. The 4-seam fastball is mediocre at best in velocity for a reliever (94.6 MPH), it’s on the straighter side, and it gets tagged to the tune of a .405 wOBA (with a .400 xWOBA to match). It’s a bottom-tier 4-seamer.  And then he throws a cutter 27% of the time. A cutter which is so bad that I can only imagine Palmer would have a coronary watching him continue to throw it. It is arguably the worst pitch in baseball this season, and over the course of his two ML seasons, hitters are posting a .486 wOBA against it. What’s most shocking is that StatCast suggests he’s been lucky to get that outcome, with a staggering .511 xWOBA on two seasons worth of cutters.    Ah, but then you have that splitter. The gift from God. And it really is, to be honest. This is a dude who would be working some every day job like the rest of us if he didn’t somehow master that splitter. But he did, and now he’s making bank playing a game. So far this season, 81 PAs ending on a splitter. Opponents have 4 hits against it (.056 BA). All those hits have been singles. 53 of those PAs ended with the hitter slinking back to the dugout (a cool 65.1% K rate), and it carries a 58.1% whiff rate. The average EV against the splitter this year is 76.7 MPH. The two-year wOBA on the splitter is .133, with a .137 xWOBA to match. Those are goofy numbers. Those are the numbers my 5-year-old nephew will put up against my best wiffleball arsenal this afternoon.    In sum, really interesting guy. Only having one effective pitch concerns me — on the days when the splitter is not splitting, he’s useless. The splitter has gotten more effective this year, not less, so that does assuage some of my concerns about the league eventually getting the book on him and spitting on the splitter in order to wait for a chance to pulverize the other junk he tosses. But is he a guy you can run out 4-5 times against the same elite hitters in a short span in October? It just seems like they’d have to get a solid feel for him after seeing a few times back to back. But if all it would cost is someone like Billy Cook, there’s really no harm done in finding out. 
    • Hopefully it extends Adleys longevity as well.  
    • Raylin Ramos returned to action today.
    • Fred Biletnikoff!  King of Stick.  Lol.  The refs hated him because every time he touched the ball it got the gook all over it and then the refs got it all over themselves.  Lol  And I agree that it should be allowed in a modest way in MLB. Just because you say it, doesn't make it so. What year was it before they started checking Pitchers after every half inning for sticky substances?  There was a year where it was pretty clear that pitchers were using something... tacki-goo?  I forget what year that was.  Were arm injuries up that year?  It might sway me a little if they were, but otherwise I don't think the the firmness of the grip is indicative of the spin.  The firmness of the grip is the control of the ball itself.  A harder grip would diminish spin.  Think of it as "english" in tennis.  The racquet glances the ball, but its the speed of the racquet that determines the spin.
    • We could be the Astros who have won 2 WS appeared in another. And been to what FIVE consecutive ALCS? With the extreme approach that we took to amass this kind of talent, I would rather set the bar high. We didn’t need to undergo the misery of extreme tanking just to have a team that could qualify for the playoffs each year. The Brewers and Guardians have that and they didn’t employ the extreme tank tactics. What we did forced MLB to change the rules to prevent it from being done again.
    • Agree.  It’s almost universal amongst all sports that size is valued when evaluating amateurs for projection.  
    • Burnes, Westburg, Ohearn, Grayson, Kimbrel, Santander. In that order.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...