Jump to content

Dumb Question but I'll ask it anyway...


DocJJ

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, btdart20 said:

This is the big value-add that FG provides IMO.  It's a good view of the general landscape.

That is a quasi-atated goal (increasing competition in the org).  The scales of a Blind SigBot at various trade deadlines will be interesting to watch.

You and @Just Regular are starting to speak the same language.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

You and @Just Regular are starting to speak the same language.

I get the impression @btdart20is actually in financial services, whereas I just watch Friedman lead a wave of execs treating ballplayers like mortgage derivatives.

It might have been especially cheeky by Elias to draft Gunnar's cost efficient replacement with the asset he earned the organization by his brilliant play.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

I get the impression @btdart20is actually in financial services, whereas I just watch Friedman lead a wave of execs treating ballplayers like mortgage derivatives.

It might have been especially cheeky by Elias to draft Gunnar's cost efficient replacement with the asset he earned the organization by his brilliant play.

LOL "risk averse" doesn't mean what the vast majority thinks it means.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're not quite as stacked as we used to be. My recollection is Norby and Stowers have been in the MLB top 100 at times even though they aren't now. The question is what happens with guys who are on the rise and inevitably replacing other graduates. Seems like Bradfield and Beavers should be fringe top 100 guys. I think Etzel should be a top 100 guy right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Frobby said:

On the depth issue, Fangraphs lists every player in every org they rate at 35+ or higher.  The O’s have 45 such prospects.  Only 6 teams have more, with 49 being the top.  There are numerous teams in the 20’s and low 30’s.  So by their reckoning, we are very deep.  Will all those guys be impact players?  Of course not.  But we have more guys with a shot at a major league career than most teams, in addition to great quality at the top.  

This is actually a really good way to look at it, after you look at studs.

Some % will hit big. Some % will be ok MLers and the rest will flame out. Having more of these guys than other systems is a good sign, even though I think it's apparent to most of us that this system isn't pumping out massive results across all levels right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fangraphs also does farm system rankings, which are now up to date pre-draft, based on the FV grades and a dollar value assigned to the FV tiers. It’s also a handy table to compare what systems are strong in the middle of the pack vs top heavy. 

https://www.fangraphs.com/prospects/farm-system-rankings

The Orioles are still #1, but that is carried in large part by the huge value assigned to Holliday as a 70 FV hitter. However, if they graduated Holliday, they’d still be about tied with Boston as #4. 

I haven’t done the math, but just looking at that table - if you took out every team’s top 4 prospects, the Orioles would fall behind some systems but still be near the top. They don’t have a large number of 50/45+/45 FV guys, which I think prompts this sentiment that the system is weaker, but it’s still strong in 40+/40/35+.

And if you look at the actual values assigned for the FV tiers, IMO the 50/45+/45 tiers (ie, back end and borderline top 100 prospects) tend to be overvalued in public perception relative to what the numbers bear out. The really elite 70/65/60/55 prospects have a ton of value, and then beyond that having a bulk of prospects matters more.

It’s true that the Orioles’ best prospects are already at the MLB or AAA level, with only Basallo in AA, so they’re going to have a lot of graduations in the near future. But the best prospects tend to be those that have already dominated the low minors, so I don’t think the Orioles are super unusual this way.

Basically, the farm is not as dominant as it once was, but they have a long way to go before they’re even just middle of the pack. 

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • One of the unique and weird things about Clutch Cargo was it entirely animated except that the mouths were video of actual moving human mouths.   It made for a very strange look.   
    • Jamie Moyer 2.0 - Book It!!!!!!!!!!!!!!😀 
    • There were men on 1st and 3rd with one out  O’Neil hits a homer 12% of the time vs lefties which is what they would have been needed to win the game.  A single just puts the winning run on 2nd maybe third most likely in Fenway a double won’t score him with the wall unless he hits it the other way which he doesn’t do.  As good as he is he still just gets a hit 33% of the time Yoshida  even though he doesn’t hit well vs them doesn’t strike out and he has 5 GIDP in 385 plate which ranks him 155th out of 178 qualified hitters with 400 at bats.  So the chances of getting a double play are very slim.   In order to win the game you have these scenarios and percentage based on splits.   1 O’Neil to hit a homer 12%  2. O’neil to get a hit 32% and Yoshida get a hit 20%(30% if Refsynder pinch hits) or Jansen to get a hit 25% 3. Walk O’Neil  20% Yoshida gets a hit or 25% Jansen gets a hit  So statistically it shows these percentages for Boston to win Pitch to O’Neil and he homers 12%  Pitch to O’Neil and they get two hits to win 14%  Walk him and face Yoshida and Jansen and one of them get a hit 22%  That is without factoring in wild pitch walk or an error which makes walking him a worse decision.      
    • That's how everyone should be looking at it. Yet, inexplicably, there are people here who think we should have more wins because...Hyde.
    • That loss eliminated them from playoff contention. He also keeps his signing bonus. Maybe pro ball wasn't his dream? Still a crap thing to do to his teammates.
    • I think the other thing is that you have to know a little bit about Dean’s personality in these press scrums.  I think he’s a very bright guy. And I think he has a tendency to come off like…someone who knows he’s a very bright guy. He can get a little dismissive and sarcastic if they ask questions he thinks are dumb. A little bit of the hipster style “well, ACTUALLY…” He does it to some degree earlier in this same interview, when they asked if he was frustrated about the two out walks and his response was basically “I actually don’t like any walks in general.” I think that’s what happened here. I think he perceived it as a dumb question, and I think his response is mostly just him politely explaining why it was a dumb question to ask him.
    • I'm not a fan of the way Hyde handles the bullpen and his (or are they the FO's) lineups often drive me nuts. Having said that, he's done a really good job overall as the O's skipper. If somebody told you at the beginning of the year we'd lose half of our top pitchers to injury and our hitters would be one of the worst teams with RISP would you think we'd only be two games out of 1st place in mid-September?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...