Jump to content

O's acquire LHP Trevor Rogers from Marlins


RVAOsFan

Recommended Posts

I'm trying to get this trade.  The market is nuts, as evidenced by the Kikuchi return.  He has some control left.  But he hasn't been good for 3 years.  He's providing value in the sense of being cost controlled for a while, but he's not really providing that much real value to a playoff team, unless he finds his magic in the bullpen or the last 9 starts aren't a mirage.  On top of that his pitch shape seems to have taken a hit along with his velo, which is down over 1 mph this year.  If we can find a way to get his velo back then I think this ends up working out okay, but he had some injuries and that stuff doesn't always pop back.

 

This feels like an extremely high risk, moderately high reward trade.  Since we acquired Eflin I guess we can stomach one of those.  But I'm definitely glad it's not in a vacuum.  By itself I'd probably give this a C or C-.

Edited by Hallas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, emmett16 said:

Let’s be real clear.  Norby is a 5’10” 2B with a 28% K-rate (in AAA) who doesn’t field very well.  
 

I like him a lot, but trade him for a serviceable SP (with upside) all day every day. 

Second base isn't the position to make comments about a player's height.

220px-Joe_Morgan_Reds_1972.jpg

licensed-image?q=tbn:ANd9GcSGVM066CVjtp5

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

How does this deal help us in October?

Pushes Suarez in the BP where he can get comfortable over the next couple months and I believe be a key BP in October. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really want to know what some of you think Connor Norby and Kyle Stowers are going to do at the MLB level over the next six years. Because while I think they'll both have value, I don't think either are much more than role-players on a team that wants to contend for the World Series.

Even assuming Trevor Rogers is who he is right now, he's at least a role-player in an area of desperate need for us right now.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you actually look at his last 9 games you see a bunch of playoff teams. Boston, Houston, Seattle, Cleveland, Phillies, Mets, Brewers. So when people say this doesn’t help in October they are wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Surhoffan17 said:

He doesn't throw hard or strike out hitters, and walks too many. We have this guy already, his name is Cade Povich and he pitched last night! His statcast numbers are NOT good. Only explanation is team control. Maybe Drew French can fix him. But it didn't work last year with Holt on Flaherty and Flaherty had actual talent. 

He has averaged 9.34 Ks/9 over his career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really liked the potential of Norby and Stowers, but both of them were very flawed unproven players. This trade has as much to do with getting to the finish line this season as it does the next year or two. 

 

It hurts, so it's probably a trade that makes sense. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, fansince71 said:

Not much, but it helps us try to get to October.

Don't we actually need help in October? Like we had a 90% chance of making the playoffs as is. Or is the goal to just get there as some posters have asserting and then rely on "luck" like the 23' Rangers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, interloper said:

Because he's the man. 

But in all seriousness, he will likely be on the bench temporarily. Westburg to 2B, Urias to 3B would be my guess. Mateo back soon hopefully. 

Another head scratcher. This team needs a shot in the arm. Vavra ain't gonna supply it.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I certainly understand the frustration from some at not acquiring a TOR or another mid-rotation starter.  However, the trade is actually quite fair if you look at it objectively.... a legit back end ML starter with 2.5 years of team control traded for two pretty good prospects.  This was a good job by Elias using blocked position player prospects to trade for team controlled pitching.  I actually really like Norby and Stowers and think both will become decent ML starters.  However, there was very little chance of either of them getting a legit shot here.  Norby was only playing because Mateo is hurt and Holliday is in AAA, and Stowers was blocked by a bunch of better LH OFers.  I'm also happy for Norby and Stowers because both will finally get the shot they deserve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, terpoh said:

Yes, Suarez and Povich really shouldn't be grouped together, Povich does not look like a big leaguer currently- but to me Rogers is a rotation upgrade over both. The clock has started to strike 12 on Suarez as a starter, and I like him a lot on this team, I just hope he can regain his place in the bullpen.

Look Rogers has upside which Suarez doesn't. Pushing Suarez to the pen means you have two big league arms there (Suarez & Irvin) who can start and have success in the case of injury.

Next year, we'll need to start the season with at least 8 proven options to start to guard against 2 or 3 members of the rotation going down to injury - this is a lesson that almost every contender has learned this year. Rogers, as a cost controlled arm with two more years of control after this year is an asset there.

He could also return to rookie form by getting out of Miami and working with a competent coaching staff. We've seen the O's help a number of pitchers find the best version of themselves.

So I understand and like a lot of the reasons that Elias pulled the trigger on this trade. I just really (REALLY) don't like guys who have trouble commanding the strike zone going up against the AL East (which btw - means I'm not a fan of Povich or McDermott at this point in their careers...).

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • One thing I have never understood about the Anthony switch hitting is he seems like a 100% better hitter hitting left handed compared to right handed.  To me it is night and day.  Now I don't know the exact numbers but I just see the way he swings.  He swings a lot better as a lefty compared to a right handed hitter.  He has had a really good season but it may be time for him to do a Mullins and swing just as a lefthander. 
    • True.  But he came through enough when the Os have really needed a guy this year.  Any guy.  I don't believe it is a huge loss but at the same time I don't think he was a throwaway either.  Which is what I believe the Orioles thought he was and is.
    • One of the hitting coaches talked publicly about Santander's process (which involves some degree of guessing, like he sits on a particular pitch until he gets it) and then he went into a bit of a slump. Not sure that was actually related, but it at least makes me wonder. Generally I don't expect strategies to be made public.
    • It is my firm belief that the Orioles are suffering from an organizational flaw.  Mainly in their hitting and fielding instruction.  Mainly at the lower levels.  I actually believe that their pitching metrics and instruction are good.  It is just that they never draft enough pitchers to fully realize the fruits of their labor and the good minor league pitchers that they do have?  They don't extend and pitch their young guys enough.  It seems as if they are always being babied.  So other teams snatch them up in trades because they see the potential and they tend do pretty well with them afterwards.  Without having to do really anything other than a few tweeks.  Imo the Orioles hitting and fielding instruction has a big flaw.  There is a major disconnect between what they are teaching in the minor leagues and how that translates to the major leagues.  For example 2 players in Mayo and Holliday appear to be complete novices when it comes to hitting major league pitching.  This despite doing very well in the minors.  I could list others as well but those are the 2 prime examples.  They are not just bad.  They are almost historically bad.  Especially when you add it the fact they are top ranked players in the minors.    And the fielding?  I cannot for the life of me understand how these players come up to the majors so lacking in fundamentals.  In addition I believe that Manager Hyde has no business coaching a major league team trying to win a world series.  He is fine as a placard when there is a team that is supposed to tank.   He can keep things on a fairy level keel.    Like the Orioles from 2017 to 2021.  But his approach as a manager in getting a team to be disciplined and focused on taking that next step to the playoffs and beyond is severely lacking imo.  The Orioles play very poor fundamental baseball in all facets.  Hitting.  Running.  Fielding.  Pitching.    That is simply coaching 101.   I sincerely hope that the Orioles brass understands this and makes the proper moves this coming off season. 
    • The poster child for the old school approach has struck out 26 times in 632 plate appearances.  He's hitting .322, his OPS+ is 109.
    • He was good in the pen last year. He had a 7.71 ERA in the pen this year and an 8.08 ERA overall the last 3 months. 
    • In 2008, the MLB average was .264.  Today it’s .244.   It’s very tough to hit .300 these days.  in 2008 there were 41 players with 400 PA who hit .300.  Right now the 41st player with 350 PA (lowered since there’s still 12ish games to play) is batting .273.    Maybe some part of that is offenses deemphasizing BA.   The bigger part, IMO, is that pitching just keeps getting harder and harder to hit.     
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...