Jump to content

Should Rubenstein relieve Mike Elias of his duties?


webbrick2010

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Baseball fandom said:

I edit.

Yes if you think he's great that's your opinion. I think he is good not great. I stand by that.  I will say this it will be interesting in seeing what he does with support of ownership with deeper pockets. I just hope for no more Norby for Rogers trade that any of us "at the end of bar" fan wouldn't had made let alone an established GM should have. 

Nothing wrong with that trade (in a vacuum) and it’s way too early to judge it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Baseball fandom said:

I' say no but let's please stop acting like he's the greatest thing since whatever.  I think he was on a great run the first few years but the last couple has been troubling to me.  That's my response. 

.

The last couple of years have been troubling to you?  Last year was troubling to you?

No one's acting like he's the greatest thing since whatever, that's just silly and hyperbole.  There's plenty of criticism levied at Elias on this board.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Baseball fandom said:

But many including myself hated that trade and early results so far certainly looks bad. 

I don’t care if some fans didn’t like it.  Many fans are wrong.

The trade itself was very reasonable. There are several reasons why you make that trade.

The question isn’t should they made the trade. The question is, was there a better trade to make?

By that I mean, could he have gotten a rental that gave us more right now value or could he have addressed the pen instead of a long term starter?

You can argue that he should have gone a different direction with those 2 players but we have no idea if he could have and if this was the best option he had, making the trade was better than not making it.

Even the early results are misleading (not that he was good but he was better than the results but bad luck and bad defense in a SSS didn’t help).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Elias is easily the most important thing that has happened to this org in at least 25 years. It’s not even debatable. 

Probably more years honestly. 

No one should ever doubt Elias' role in turning this franchise around. 

The question that we will need to ask at some point (not even close to now), is he the guy that can take the team to the next level or sustain this level of success over 5-7 year span? 

He's now judged on his success on the major league diamond. He will be judged by how far his team goes in the playoffs. 

Now this season, depending on who returns from injury, I'm willing to give him a bit of a mulligan because of the injuries. He looks to have improved his team at the deadline with Eflin (assuming he doesn't miss significant time) and the two Phillies trades for Dominguez and Soto.

The Rogers trade though looks like he should fire his professional scouts, and the fact this team needs to to play Eloy and Slater speaks to its lack of depth at the upper levels in the hitting department, despite drafting mostly college hitters with his first 5 rounds since 2019.

Either way, I think we all agree that the Orioles, despite two months of absolute mediocrity, are still going to the playoffs and as we've seen, if they get hot then, no one will remember or care about these two months.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I don’t care if some fans didn’t like it.  Many fans are wrong.

The trade itself was very reasonable. There are several reasons why you make that trade.

The question isn’t should they made the trade. The question is, was there a better trade to make?

By that I mean, could he have gotten a rental that gave us more right now value or could he have addressed the pen instead of a long term starter?

You can argue that he should have gone a different direction with those 2 players but we have no idea if he could have and if this was the best option he had, making the trade was better than not making it.

Even the early results are misleading (not that he was good but he was better than the results but bad luck and bad defense in a SSS didn’t help).

We have to agree to disagree on this. There is no other way around it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Baseball fandom said:

We have to agree to disagree on this. There is no other way around it. 

You can agree to disagree...but the Rogers trade really isn't a hill to die on, either.  It's not the trade to judge Elias on.  And if you want to judge Elias and hold that trade above anything/everything else like it's some kind of trump card...well, I think you'd be one of a few doing that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Baseball fandom said:

But many including myself hated that trade and early results so far certainly looks bad. 

Cool.

We have Rogers for 2025 and 2026 though, and I suspect his acquisition had a lot more to do with those years than this year. 

He was clearly a reclamation project rather than a pure "win now" move. It's crazy to me how few people seem to realize this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moose Milligan said:

You can agree to disagree...but the Rogers trade really isn't a hill to die on, either.  It's not the trade to judge Elias on.  And if you want to judge Elias and hold that trade above anything/everything else like it's some kind of trump card...well, I think you'd be one of a few doing that.

See what Tony wrote. He nailed it to a T for me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DrinkinWithFermi said:

Cool.

We have Rogers for 2025 and 2026 though, and I suspect his acquisition had a lot more to do with those years than this year. 

He was clearly a reclamation project rather than a pure "win now" move. It's crazy to me how few people seem to realize this.

Sadly you had to remind me we have got multiple years. Yuck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I don’t care if some fans didn’t like it.  Many fans are wrong.

The trade itself was very reasonable. There are several reasons why you make that trade.

The question isn’t should they made the trade. The question is, was there a better trade to make?

By that I mean, could he have gotten a rental that gave us more right now value or could he have addressed the pen instead of a long term starter?

You can argue that he should have gone a different direction with those 2 players but we have no idea if he could have and if this was the best option he had, making the trade was better than not making it.

Even the early results are misleading (not that he was good but he was better than the results but bad luck and bad defense in a SSS didn’t help).

The thought behind the trade made sense, but after seeing what Roger's stuff looked like, I do think they need to address the professional scouts or system that thought Rogers would help this team in a pennant drive.

I mean, without scouting Rogers, I thought just looking at the overall numbers that he might be better than Povich and is retainable so why not? Westburg and Mateo were still healthy and playing everyday so there didn't appear like many PAs available for Norby or Stowers this year.

But when I watched his first game I was shocked by the lack of stuff. Not just velocity, but only the change was vaguely a major league pitch and he was struggling to command that pitch. So I thought, maybe it was just that start. Then he came out and was that guy again. Then again. That's when it hit me, that's who this guy is right now.

What made them think he was an "adjustment" away from being successful in a pennant drive? 

That goes back to the question, has the team ever acquired a struggling pitcher at the major league level during a season and made him better? Flaherty and Fuji say hello.

Eflin was already good, and Dominguez and Soto have been who they were, talented but inconsistent relievers that you never fully have confidence in during one run or tie games.

This is where I think the Orioles think they are smarter than they are. 

And for the love of God, I wish Elias would stop trading with the Marlins or picking up their cast offs. Their GM must have an Elias shrine built, and every time the phone rings he must hope it's Elias on the other side.

 

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Well, I guess I need to get to the stadium by 11 AM today to watch Urias and Westburg here in Nashville! The stadium is 50 feet from my office window.
    • No, It is my understanding that he is now a FA. Any team that picks him up is on the hook for prorated minimum this year only. The O's owe him the buy out. 
    • Burnes starting won’t help anyone hit. And I have minimal expectations for Westburg in his very first game back.    We just gave up 15 runs to a pretty damn pedestrian SF lineup last two games. I don’t think a ‘hangover lineup’ is going to help as much as you think. Plus again, if we can’t score it doesn’t matter much what the opposing lineup looks like.    I did just realize we have 10 games left, not 11. 3-7 seems even less likely than 3-8, ha.   
    • Game 1 Corbin Burnes, and Sunday Jordan Westburg and a bullpen game before an off day? We'll see in 10 days, but I think the Tigers run of good play at the end will have helped protect OPACY home field for the ALWC round. Very happy flight for the Tigers, and I'd guess they are asleep at their Baltimore hotel by now, waiting for tomorrow night.    Tigers home next week with two Skubal starts if necessary and a White Sox series, so the Royals and Twins are probably cheering pretty hard for us. If we finish this week 0-4, the Yankees might have that hangover lineup the day after division clinching one of our games there.    It looks pretty likely while we are in New York, the guys will have a front row seat handing over the AL East champion honor.
    • They still need to win a few games to get there. I still don’t understand why people are acting like that is so certain (quoting you but not referring to you, per se).    3-8 in the last 11. 11 games left. In all seriousness, what makes anyone think we can even go 3-8 in the next 11?  We are bad in every single phase of the game and we’re playing against teams who have everything to play for (other than SF today, and they’ve pretty easily handled us this week already).    These last two games against SF, especially last night, have convinced me they’re going to fully blow this. We’ve already shown that Detroit can handle us. Probably going to lose to Webb today. Then it’s NY in NY. When is the last time we beat the Yanks in a late season series that mattered to both teams?  Ever? This team certainly isn’t the one to do it. And then it’s do or die in MIN. Anybody believe we can take 2/3 there?  I just don’t see a path to more than three wins, and even getting three doesn’t seem remotely certain. I think we’ll be lucky to win one game each of these last three series. Maybe that’s enough, but I’m far from sure they can even do that.    What’s the counterpoint to this?  Injury returns?  Too late for that IMO. Just start playing better?  What would make anyone believe that’s going to happen after 3.5 months of bad baseball? For real, someone tell me what they’re seeing that makes them think even 3-8 is going to happen in the next 11. 
    • We traded far too much for what we got in return IMO. You can't totally judge trades this early but as it stands now, Elias gets a well deserved D for his trade deadline performance. I've said this before. He's done a fantastic job bringing this club back to relevancy. I just question some of his roster construction and trade decisions.
    • Since July 1st, the Orioles are 31-37 and since the Trading deadline when Elias was supposed to make the team better they've gone 19-24 (.441). Now grant it the team lost Westburg and Grayson as well as Eflin for a little bit, but what can't be swept under the rug is that Elias traded a decent part of his minor league league prospects and the team has done worse. The acquisitions of Rogers, Jimenez and Soto have not improved the team. Eflin has kept them from being even worse and we have him for next year, and the same goes for Dominguez. Hopefully Soto will figure it out or Elias wasted two pitching prospects (Chace being probably being the one with the most upside of any pitcher traded).  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...