Jump to content

All in on our future


Big Al

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, waroriole said:

You’re right when looking at the season overall. Really, only Cowser and Kjerstad strike out at a higher than average rate. Whatever they did to screw up Adley’s approach adds to the angst of the organizational approach. Plus, seeing them come up short time and time again over the last 2+ months of the season. 
 

 

Even since the AS break, most of their numbers were top 10 in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

Right..things need to be tweaked and some personnel has to change.

There isn’t going to be an overhaul of philosophy.  

Thanks for proving that point.

Letting the hitting coaches go is more than a tweak.    We don't know about how or if the hitting philosophy will change but Elias is taking action to fix the 2nd half offensive problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Letting the hitting coaches go is more than a tweak.    We don't know about how or if the hitting philosophy will change but Elias is taking action to fix the 2nd half offensive problems.

And again, getting rid of coaches doesn’t mean you overhaul the philosophy. 
 

Im not sure if you actually pay attention to sports or not..many of your posts make me question if you do but coaches are let go for tons of reasons.  Sometimes they just want to leave, sometimes they don’t have chemistry with the players, sometimes their messaging doesn’t get through…there are tons of reasons.

The Orioles aren’t going to look at the stats the last few years, see how the have had one of the best offenses in the sport and say, ok let’s change he everything. That’s not a logical thing to believe.

But will they look to replace some guys?  Sure. Will they perhaps look for a few hitters that can put the ball in the play more?  Sure, that’s possible.

Things will be tweaked but as Elias said, there is a lot of randomness to this stuff and there was some bad luck.  It’s not the only explanation but it’s a big part of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Letting the hitting coaches go is more than a tweak.    We don't know about how or if the hitting philosophy will change but Elias is taking action to fix the 2nd half offensive problems.

They have an organizational hitting philosophy. It’s worked. The coaches are an extension of that. 
 

The names may change but the overall approach will not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that Fuller and Borgschulte are now gone feels like chum for a frustrated fan base that wanted somewhere to direct responsibility for an Orioles season that ended incredibly early, relative to expectations. It also wasn’t very fun toward the end, given some offensive struggles.

But this is not a dramatic change in philosophy for the Orioles. Whoever they hire for those spots will likely retain the general philosophy of controlling the strike zone to get pitches that can be hit hard. As recently as the July amateur draft, they reinforced that they believe what they believe in, and it’ll take them hiring someone completely old-school for me to think that has changed. These moves are not a refutation of what these coaches preached.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, eddie83 said:

The fact that Fuller and Borgschulte are now gone feels like chum for a frustrated fan base that wanted somewhere to direct responsibility for an Orioles season that ended incredibly early, relative to expectations. It also wasn’t very fun toward the end, given some offensive struggles.

But this is not a dramatic change in philosophy for the Orioles. Whoever they hire for those spots will likely retain the general philosophy of controlling the strike zone to get pitches that can be hit hard. As recently as the July amateur draft, they reinforced that they believe what they believe in, and it’ll take them hiring someone completely old-school for me to think that has changed. These moves are not a refutation of what these coaches preached.

I copied a portion of the story. Can see it better here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I think it's an easy call to keep all 3 right now.  Kremer is in the rotation somewhere, and both Povich and Rogers will have to fight for the 5th spot, or they will come up throughout the year.  The Orioles don't have a lot of LH SP depth, so I think they will want to keep both Povich and Rogers. That said, if the O's go out and sign 2 SP as rotation upgrades, Kremer is a good trade candidate. 
    • 2 of the best teams in the league at big plays and 2 of the worst offenses at allowing big plays. Baker is cooking but is also turning it over a lot. They have a sneaky good run game and lots of guys who can hurt you in the pass game.    Not the best matchup for the Ravens but I think they find a way to win.
    • The Orioles are very likely to lose Burnes and certainly need to add a starter this offseason. The Orioles, whether fans want to acknowledge it or not, value Rogers and feel they can get something out of him. They also clearly value Kremer, as he has 90 starts the last 4 seasons and has basically pitched to the level of a #3 starter the last 3 seasons combined. Povich got 16 starts in 2024.  He ended the year very strong. The question for me is, do you keep all of these guys. I know we also have McDermott but I think his injury last year buys time for him to start more in the minors.  And we are unclear about Suarez. So, let’s just keep this discussion to the 3 I mentioned. Povich and Rogers can be in the minors and we can treat them as depth but do the Orioles do that? They clearly like Rogers and while Povich starting 16 was more out of necessity, he did show well at times. We know Eflin and GRod are in the rotation, assuming health. We know they need to add one guy but if you want to add 2, do you keep all of these guys or do you look to trade one of them? There are a lot of ways I would be happy with the Os going this offseason w/r/t pitching and trading (likely) Povich or Kremer is something that could come into play.    Would you rather look for upgrades on these guys and trade someone or just keep everyone because you need/want that depth? And would you be ok just adding one starter and having either Povich or Rogers in the rotation?
    • Kremer never had those kind of control issues and was two years younger when he arrived in the big leagues.  McDermott is 26 years old coming off a year in which he walked 5 per nine innings in the minors.  Unless he is going to magically improve his command dramatically in 2025, it's time to try him as a reliever.  
    • Well then a lot of people aren't sensible then.  But I'm sure that's the point you were trying to make  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...