Jump to content

Anyone else cheering for the O's to lose?


JoeOrsulak

Recommended Posts

Now you're moving past the point. Honestly the point isn't what Irsay did or didn't do, it's that your initial statement was far too general. Your theory is valid, but it only is completely valid in a bubble. A bubble completely devoid of socio-political influence. You can't honestly expect to paint such a broad stroke with your brush and not be challenged on it, do you?

Again, your point has validity, but you're not taking in to account specific details, of which you admittedly had little personal experience with. There's nothing wrong with your theory in principle, but there are waaaaaay more factors involved than you are giving credit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 277
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Now you're moving past the point. Honestly the point isn't what Irsay did or didn't do, it's that your initial statement was far too general. Your theory is valid, but it only is completely valid in a bubble. A bubble completely devoid of socio-political influence. You can't honestly expect to paint such a broad stroke with your brush and not be challenged on it, do you?

Again, your point has validity, but you're not taking in to account specific details, of which you admittedly had little personal experience with. There's nothing wrong with your theory in principle, but there are waaaaaay more factors involved than you are giving credit.

No I give other factors credit but again I just stated that my theory had merit, which you admit. The ultimate litmus test for my theory is when the Ravens ultimately hit a slide, then we'll see the fickle nature of Baltimore fans. Or maybe we won't........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not going to keep beating this dead horse with you, its pointless. Trying to convince someone in Baltimore that maybe, just maybe Irsay isn't the devil is like trying to someone from Brooklyn that O'Malley isn't the devil.

Oh, stop. O'Malley tried for years to use his own money to build a new domed stadium in Brooklyn. The idiot NY roads-czar insisted that he move the Dodgers out of Brooklyn. O'Malley tried hard to stay in Brooklyn, and he tried hard for several years. When he was told that his only option was to leave Brookyn, he finally agreed. He just picked a different destination than Flushing. The bad guy in that story is the NY roads-czar: he cost NYC both of their NL teams.

I don't think O'Malley is an angel by any means, but comparing Irsay to him is just foolish. As an owner, Irsay had no redeeming qualities. He was a drunk and an ass, and even his own family thought so. Again, it might be helpful if you learned a bit more about history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No I give other factors credit but again I just stated that my theory had merit, which you admit. The ultimate litmus test for my theory is when the Ravens ultimately hit a slide, then we'll see the fickle nature of Baltimore fans. Or maybe we won't........

Well, we're trying to tell you that your blanket statement of a "fickle nature of typical Baltimore fans" (I think your use of typical was probably the barnburner moreso than fickle) is a bit off base.

Orioles: never had "great" attendance numbers when they kicked absolute ass 66-83. The awesome attendance numbers coincided with a new park, the decline both coincided with novelty wearing off and a prolonged stay of non-contention. Neither of which point to a fickle nature.

Football: Not reopening the Colts can of worms, but after they left, the town went crazy trying for a new team. Turned down for socio-economic political reasons until Modell made himself a pariah to Cleveland to get a team here. Been more than embraced since. Stallions were embraced, and left only because the owner knew he stood no chance with an NFL team in town again.

Lacrosse: Fans around here never got on board with the Bayhawks, for reasons that are unknown. Maybe they prefer prep/college play better, but I know they weren't advertised very well either. So that's not really fickle, that's not going from the get go.

Bullets were explained better than me above.

Basically, I think the point is, a typical Baltimore fan is no more or less fickle than other towns fans. With the notable exception of Cubs fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No I give other factors credit but again I just stated that my theory had merit, which you admit. The ultimate litmus test for my theory is when the Ravens ultimately hit a slide, then we'll see the fickle nature of Baltimore fans. Or maybe we won't........

What a silly statement. To imply that Baltimore fans are more fickle than those of other cities is completely unfounded and most likely false. Any city has higher attendance when their team is winning. To compare the Colts move to others shows little knowledge of the situation and does nothing to give your "theory" any validity. I suppose that's what happens when one posts anytime any silly little thought runs through their head though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Irsay was one of my least favorite humans of all time. However the team was really not supported like it should have been. I actually used to go to alot of games with my father. He would have rather gone to a Skins game as that was his team but even in the mediocre years a skins ticket was hard to get. You could get a ticket for just about any Colts game even in the Bert Jones to Roger Carr days. The Colts also started the tradition of letting other teams fans take over a stadium. If you had the pleasure to see a Colts Steelers game in that era you would have sworn that you were in Pittsburg. I really do not know why it was that way, but it was. I know the city was not going to build a new statium and I remember Parking was a real problem around memorial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a silly statement. To imply that Baltimore fans are more fickle than those of other cities is completely unfounded and most likely false. Any city has higher attendance when their team is winning. To compare the Colts move to others shows little knowledge of the situation and does nothing to give your "theory" any validity. I suppose that's what happens when one posts anytime any silly little thought runs through their head though.

Wow your in depth explanations certainly convinced me...... :rolleyes:

Yet another outraged poster that only focuses on the Colts aspect of the equation............. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Irsay was one of my least favorite humans of all time. However the team was really not supported like it should have been. I actually used to go to alot of games with my father. He would have rather gone to a Skins game as that was his team but even in the mediocre years a skins ticket was hard to get. You could get a ticket for just about any Colts game even in the Bert Jones to Roger Carr days. The Colts also started the tradition of letting other teams fans take over a stadium. If you had the pleasure to see a Colts Steelers game in that era you would have sworn that you were in Pittsburg. I really do not know why it was that way, but it was. I know the city was not going to build a new statium and I remember Parking was a real problem around memorial.

Baltimore has a history of not going to games when teams are successful and those are not promising trends towards turning a profit as an owner. Lest we forget that owners are usually in this arena for turning a profit as opposed to being a "rabid" fan of said team.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you actually read my posts? Did I say that the fans made the Colts leave? The answer is NO! I merely stated that dwindling attendance played a factor. Was it as big of a factor as the inability to get a new stadium or the tremendous offer made by the city of Indianapolis, NO!. Don't pick and choose portions of posts as the theme of them.......

Do you know anything about the situation with the NBA Hornets?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Baltimore has a history of not going to games when teams are successful and those are not promising trends towards turning a profit as an owner. Lest we forget that owners are usually in this arena for turning a profit as opposed to being a "rabid" fan of said team.......

Have you ever heard the saying, "better to be thought an idiot than to open your mouth and removing all doubt"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • That above scenario is the only reason I could see us keeping Urias right now. Would we want to lose a close playoff game because we pinch hit for Mateo to tie a game/get the lead, but lose the game because Mayo isn’t the defender Urias is.  We have options after we trade Urias, 1. Just simply have Holliday on the playoff roster. If Mateo is pinch hit for, then Holliday just comes in at 2B. 1-1 substitution keeping Westburg at 3B. 2. We make a small trade for a defensive wiz that can play 3B and stash him on our roster and make sure he’s playoff eligible.  Either way, this is a likely scenario in the playoffs, but it’s fixable. Get Mayo up here. 
    • Etzel is carrying the class in terms of early production. He’s already in AA Bowie. He’s not a little guy either for a CF, which you would think with him being a 10th rd pick. He’s 6’2” 200.  EBJ I feel like is going to frustrate us because he might be the Jorge Mateo of CF.  Casual fans don’t like that, but our lineup is poised to carry a GG level CF with elite base stealing/base running.  I’ll lump Josenberger and Vasquez together at the moment. Both are guys with 30+ SB, but in that .670 OPS range in A+ Aberdeen. Again, just like EBJ, can they get that OPS up enough to be playable offensively. I do not know about their defense. Can Josenberger play CF  in pro ball?  How does Vasquez look at SS? Urman and Cunningham are struggling. Horvath hit just .199 in April and May.  He got off to a slow start and hit the IL for a bit. He’s really come on recently.     Thoughts?  
    • I guess it comes down to how much they like him and if they can agree on a dollar figure.  Someone said he was going to be in the mlb draft league but I didn’t see him listed on any rosters.
    • FIP doesn’t suggest anything. 
    • No matter what?    Lol Yeah, he could start against LHP.     
    • If that is the only penalty, then if we like him, why not?  I believe we drafted Fabian after he didn’t sign with the Red Sox the previous year, and gave him 300k.  If we like Lott, then we can find the savings somewhere else in the draft.  We’re going to be picking late in the next several drafts. I believe this is viewed as a weaker draft. That was one of the reasons we came off the pick for Burnes. So I say sign him. 
    • Mateo will start vs LHP no matter what. Westburg 3B, Mateo 2B, Mounty 1B, and Mayo DH.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...