Jump to content

Time for Bergesen to go back down (update: Bergesen sent down)


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

Here's my question.

After last season (and even during the year) there was some discussion about how Bergesen's peripheral numbers suggested he wouldn't be able to repeat last season's success.

Is it possible the issue isn't whether he can return to last season's form but whether he's just regressing to a more natural level?

His regression would not be to a 12.19 ERA.

His FIP in 2009 was 4.10

His xFIP in 2009 was 4.42

His ZiPS projection for 2010 was 4.68

These are all around the true talent level I'd expect of Bergesen if his performance was similar that of 2009.

What's going on right now is clearly not statistical regression. His command has gone from pinpoint to awful and the movement on his pitches has been much worse. His GB% was a big part of his success last season and it wasn't luck. It was just a little bit worse than his MiL GB%.

So far his sinker isn't sinking, his slider isn't sliding, and his command is not good. The results are indicative of a different pitcher than we saw last year. What's changed is not outcomes but performance.

Something's just not right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 156
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Here's my question.

After last season (and even during the year) there was some discussion about how Bergesen's peripheral numbers suggested he wouldn't be able to repeat last season's success.

Is it possible the issue isn't whether he can return to last season's form but whether he's just regressing to a more natural level?

His FIP last year was 4.10. xFIP was 4.42. So his peripherals weren't as good as his ERA, but still quite respectable.

His worse case natural level is probably a 5.5-6 ERA imo. Not good, but obviously much better than what he is doing.

Ah, see I was beat to the punch, good post RVAbird.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His regression would not be to a 12.19 ERA.

His FIP in 2009 was 4.10

His xFIP in 2009 was 4.42

His ZiPS projection for 2010 4.68

These are all around the true talent level I'd expect of Bergesen if his performance was similar that of 2009.

What's going on right now is clearly not statistical regression. His command has gone from pinpoint to awful and the movement on his pitches has been much worse. His GB% was a big part of his success last season and it wasn't luck. It was just a little bit worse than his MiL GB%.

So far his sinker isn't sinking his slider isn't sliding, and his command is not good. The results are indicative of a different pitcher than we saw last year. What's changed is not outcomes but performance.

Something's just not right.

I almost threw in a "Obviously I don't think he's THIS bad, but it could be going too far in the other direction", but I figured it was, well, obvious :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I almost threw in a "Obviously I don't think he's THIS bad, but it could be going too far in the other direction", but I figured it was, well, obvious :D

Yeah, I know you know better than to come to that conclusion. I was really just carrying out the idea of outcome regression vs. change in performance.

I was pretty concerned about Bergesen regressing this season. Prior to 2009 I considered him a possible back-end starter or middle reliever, or guy who could give you a ~5.00 and 150 IP but might be better suited out of the bullpen. My opinions don't change too easily but after I watched him pitch in the big leagues last year a couple of things adjusted my projection.

In any case, the difference for Bergesen right now is clearly in performance, not outcomes (IMO). He has less movement and worse command. He's not the pitcher he was last year, but I also contend he's not the pitcher he was in the minor leagues. I think he will be okay but he needs to make some big adjustments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AAA isn't a death sentence. There are minor leagues for a reason. Let him get straightened out and then get him back up here. More starts like the last 3 aren't good for anybody.

Yes very good point. Remember that Ricky Nolasco was horrible his first handfull of starts last year but after a AAA stint where he was able to collect himself mentally, he came back and pitched great the rest of the year.

I'm not sure why people are so against him going down to AAA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes very good point. Remember that Ricky Nolasco was horrible his first handfull of starts last year but after a AAA stint where he was able to collect himself mentally, he came back and pitched great the rest of the year.

I'm not sure why people are so against him going down to AAA.

Even though I think he definitely needs to be sent down to Norfolk for a while, I think it's fair to not want to burn an option if you don't think it's absolutely necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I think it's time for Bergy to head back down and have Mike Griffin work with him as Griffin was the one that helped out Bergy a ton with his tempo.

Right on... his tempo being off was one of the biggest things I noticed tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His sinker was working relatively well. He was getting ground balls, but they were finding holes. The big one (for his psyche) being the error to Wigginton that would have gotten him out of the inning yielding only 1 run.

I think what happened was this:

Bergy went out there with intent to show that he fixed his issue. He pitched relatively well, until he hit adversity (i.e. not locating his offspeed pitches). He finally gets his location, and guys are just hitting ground balls that found holes, and ultimately one that caused him to fall off his own wagon (the error).

He needs to stop expecting that these ground balls are going to turn into outs, and just relax. He never got into a rhythm. He was pissed, out of rhythm, and that's what threw things into oblivion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AAA isn't a death sentence. There are minor leagues for a reason. Let him get straightened out and then get him back up here. More starts like the last 3 aren't good for anybody.

Good point. After several months in the big leagues, Halladay was sent back to single A to sort things out and it worked out for him. Right now Bergesen looks nothing like the pitcher we saw last year. Let's get ahead of the curve on this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess the thing that I didn't like most about watching him tonight was the rushing of the delivery that Lucky Jim pointed out. It seemed like he could have been called for a couple of balks when he had runners on base because he didn't come to a set on his delivery.

Last year, he seemed to be quite confident on the mound. He certainly hasn't looked confident at all this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think he's psychologically over the horrific defense behind him.

Exactly - he's fallen apart in all three starts after the defense failed to make plays that would have gotten him out of what later turned out to be huge innings. Jones, Tejada and Wigginton all blew plays they could (or should) have made.

Doesn't remove the responsibility for the walks and hits Bergy gave up before and after those plays, but we all know he's a guy that needs strong defense behind him to be successful and the O's haven't provided that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/sports/orioles/blog/2010/04/bergesen_likely_headed_to_mino.html

Orioles manager Dave Trembley and pitching coach Rick Kranitz were meeting with struggling starter Brad Bergesen behind closed doors in the manager's office as I left the clubhouse.

I'm told by multiple sources that Bergesen has been informed that he won't make his next start up here and he's headed to the minors.

Hopefully, I'll have more tomorrow, but it's hard to get people on the horn at 1:45 East Coast time. I'm guessing either long reliever Jason Berken or Triple-A Norfolk's Jake Arrieta takes his spot in the rotation. But we shall see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I'm honestly starting to get worried about guys like Adley and our prospects. If these guys don't pan out we aren't going to be a successful franchise for a while.  There's no reason why the offense should be this bad right now. 
    • Say what you will about Mouncastle's consistency at the plate. Compared to anyone else on the team he's by far our best fielding 1st baseman. Not even close. Every short hop with O'Hearn is an adventure.
    • I'm not necessarily going to buy that Holliday and Mayo should be expected to struggle this much. Jackson Merrill hasn't.   Jackson Chourio hasn't.   It's not automatic that guys have to go through a period where they are hitting around .100 and striking out more than half the time.   Lots of good players come up, have some ups and downs, but are not THAT bad.
    • Sure does...but I believe he was acquired for 2025 so I won't make any judgment till June or so.
    • We don't need his bat, we are doing just fine.
    • For me, winning the division is the greatest accomplishment left in the game. When I was growing up, four teams would qualify for the playoffs: in each league, the best team in the east and the best in the west would face off in a championship series, and the winner would go to the World Series.  Winning the division back then was the due reward for playing great ball all season long. That's how it still should be. That's the whole problem with the current playoff system, in a nutshell. Winning a division after playing 162 games should mean a lot.  As for this year's Orioles, I ceased to be disappointed in them sometime in late July or so. Instead, I regard them as a promising work-in-progress whose best days lie in the years ahead. They are kind of like the Houston Astros just when they started to get good but still weren't a world-class team.
    • I can't help but wonder if our hitting coaches basically just do one thing:   preach the launch angle approach that Elias has determined that leads to optimal overall results.   Don't worry about strikeouts.   Emphasis on doing the most damage when you swing (vs just trying to put the ball in play, hit 'em where they ain't, etc). And that approach, taken as a whole, DOES lead to better overall results, and I believe it IS the correct holistic approach for an organization to take in drafting, developing, and coaching players? But if it is the only thing our hitting coaches know how to teach, could that also be a problem?    When a batter is in a slump, maybe he should be less concerned with focusing on the amount of damage he does per swing, but jsut with putting the ball in play to make something happen.    Could there be a psychological effect?   Players and ex-players will talk abouit a bloop hit helping them get out of a slump.   Football players will talk about going immediately back to a receiver who drops a ball to boost his confidence and "keep him in the game". And most "old school" baseball coaches believed in these things, and used them to help guys get out of slumps.   Maybe there is still some wisdom in that approach, not as a primary approach, but to help a guy get his confidence back, start seeing the ball better, etc.   And maybe the guys we hired aren't able to, even temporarily, change what they are telling guys to help them when they are struggling. Just speculating.   Grasping for answers at the astonishing lack of hitting we are seeing on so many nights.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...