Jump to content

Would you ever take a High School Catcher in the first round?


Recommended Posts

http://www.hsbaseballweb.com/pro-scouting/scouting_catchers.htm

"The evaluation of high school catchers may be the most subjective of all the scouting involving young players. Many professional scouting directors will tell you that after pitchers the drafting of high school catchers has the biggest "wash out" rate percentage among players drafted each year."

Really makes me wonder that the Snyder pick was about all those years ago?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.hsbaseballweb.com/pro-scouting/scouting_catchers.htm

"The evaluation of high school catchers may be the most subjective of all the scouting involving young players. Many professional scouting directors will tell you that after pitchers the drafting of high school catchers has the biggest "wash out" rate percentage among players drafted each year."

Really makes me wonder that the Snyder pick was about all those years ago?

If that high school catcher is Bryce Harper, then yes. All others, probably no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that high school catcher is Bryce Harper, then yes. All others, probably no.

Exactly what I was thinking... ;)

This just makes me think of all the wasted picks we have had over the years on HS players in general.

Please don't fall apart Dylan!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Relying heavily on defensive position among high school players is a fool's errand. It is all about the bat. If that bat is good enough, he will fit in somewhere defensively. You don't know whether he is going to grow out of a defensive position or not but as long as the bat will play and he is reasonably athletic, you can find him a defensive position

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that high school catcher is Bryce Harper, then yes. All others, probably no.

And the Nats immediately moved him off catcher.

I wouldn't in the top 10 and would be hesitant to do so later in the round. It would have to be a situation where I had him significantly higher on my board, talent wise, then where I was picking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the Nats immediately moved him off catcher.

I wouldn't in the top 10 and would be hesitant to do so later in the round. It would have to be a situation where I had him significantly higher on my board, talent wise, then where I was picking.

He was still a high school catcher. I agree with how Washington has handled him so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was drafted out of College of Southern Nevada.

He got his GED early and went to junior college.

True, but he got his GED in his sophomore year of HS (2009) . He was still HS-aged and it was junior college. Nit meet pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would never draft a high school catcher due to the fact that it is a high risk low reward pick. First catcher is a tough position to reach the majors since you have to balance out your catching duties with your batting. Even if you do make it to the majors how many catchers in the league are truly middle of the order hitters, maybe 2 or 3.

If you draft a high schooler with an above average bat for a catcher but his defense is bad the only other option for him is 1B. In that case he becomes a below average player.

If I am going to draft a catcher he will be a college player since they are more refined and their defense is more of a sure bet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would never draft a high school catcher due to the fact that it is a high risk low reward pick. First catcher is a tough position to reach the majors since you have to balance out your catching duties with your batting. Even if you do make it to the majors how many catchers in the league are truly middle of the order hitters, maybe 2 or 3.

If you draft a high schooler with an above average bat for a catcher but his defense is bad the only other option for him is 1B. In that case he becomes a below average player.

If I am going to draft a catcher he will be a college player since they are more refined and their defense is more of a sure bet.

Boston drafted Blake Swihart to catch, but he is easily athletic enough to play in the infield or outfield were they to decide to move him. Same with Austin Hedges in San Diego. This year, Stryker Trahan could likely handle an outfield corner, as could a number of other highschool catchers.

I take your point, though, that if the player's value is heavily tied to his position, there is a risk that he will lose that value if/when he has to move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boston drafted Blake Swihart to catch, but he is easily athletic enough to play in the infield or outfield were they to decide to move him. Same with Austin Hedges in San Diego. This year, Stryker Trahan could likely handle an outfield corner, as could a number of other highschool catchers.

I take your point, though, that if the player's value is heavily tied to his position, there is a risk that he will lose that value if/when he has to move.

You can add Jayson Werth to the list. Originally drafted as a catcher in 97. I was just reading a pretty entertaining write-up that described how Werth's manager his first few years in the Orioles minor leagues would constantly defend Werth and tell the front office that he was going to be a MLB player. The FO (Syd Thrift) didn't buy it and we know the rest of the story. Don't mean to derail the thread...just seemed applicable, plus a good read.

http://www.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20110107&content_id=16406786&vkey=news_milb&fext=.jsp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would lump high school pitchers in the same category as high school catchers. There are so many factors to consider, but I would need to see a talent that was so special with tremendous upside that I could not walk away from that player. Harper, Bundy, Mauer and Strasburg to name a few. I would not have invested picked many of the guys the Orioles have drafted in the first round if I was the GM, but so much of that has to do with the team having a budget, drafting based on need (I never would) and the fact that I would have geared the team towards the top pick by dealing away aging veterans.

The Orioles would likely have a better feel to them had they drafted a couple slots prior to where they picked in a couple drafts. Harper and Strasburg come to mind, but there are some others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • There probably was no "right" choice and absolutely no "absolutely right choice" I was on record wanting to choose Abrahms and my logic was simple, a 1:1 is a chance to pick a HOF type talent A college catcher was a safe pick and Adley is having a nice career but he is clearly not a MVP/HOF type player.
    • Agreed, Akin is pitching too well to be optioned until there’s no other choices. Tate should certainly be optioned before him. The only reason I could see Akin needing to be optioned is if BOTH Means and Irvin end up in the pen (with Bradish, Kremer and Suárez starting). That’s possibly the best 5 SP right now if they believe Suárez > Means/Irvin. In which case you really can’t have 5 lefty RP and only one RHP to go with Kimbrel and Cano. Otherwise, they should carry 4 lefty RP (with one of Means/Irvin as the long man) before optioning Akin. 
    • The answer to the question is obviously no. Now if the question was would Gunnar have been worthy #1 pick the answer seems obvious that he would have been.    But taking him where he went allowed the Orioles to maximize their draft which is what every team hopes to do.    You can argue whether Adley was the right pick but if Gunnar went first there is no way the two picks work as well for Baltimore. 
    • 1080i video is redrawn a half frame (field) at 60 times per second.  Progressive footage like 1080p is 30 whole frames per second but often converted to interlaced format for transmission. If you are doing this on an ongoing basis, here's a suggestion: download the free version of one of the numerous non-linear editors out there like Avid or DaVinci Resolve and throw the clip on a timeline for your measurement.  Manually clicking through hundreds of frames seems like it would be needlessly cumbersome not to mention slow.  
    • This. I don’t get the Akin going down talk (even though it seems more based off his option remaining than performance). Right now Akin is arguably our 4th most trusted reliever (can argue with Webb) based off his usage and his peripherals are clearly in the top 4 with Cano, Kimbrel, and Coulombe. He might not be a setup guy but he’s a solid piece to have in the middle innings.   Akin’s K-BB% is nearly double that of Baumann’s in both of their careers as relievers. He K’s more, walks less, and gets more chases and whiffs.   Keeping Baumann over Akin even for a week isn’t a move that winning teams make. Not to trash him, but Baumann is just not good, so who cares if he gets claimed? He’s not trusted at this point late in close games unless the bullpen is overused, so if you lose him and need a replacement later in the year you have Heasley, Charles, and Tate (if he gets optioned). Then you also have Wells who should be a bullpen guy when he comes back. Having the flexibility is good but keeping one of your worst relievers just because he doesn’t have an option doesn’t seem like a good way to solve a log jam. 
    • Witt had hit tool questions on draft day, and Abrams was much less of a sure thing than Adley. Based on information known at the time, we absolutely made the right choice with Adley.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...