Jump to content

vs. ATHLETICS, 8/05


OFFNY

Recommended Posts

o

BALTIMORE O RIOLES

Manny Machado - 3B

Gerardo Parra - RF

Adam Jones - CF

Chris Davis - 1B

Jimmy Paredes - DH

James Jerry Hardy - SS

Jonathan Schoop - 2B

Nolan Reimold - LF

Caleb Joseph - C

Wei-Yin Chen - LHP (5-6, 3.24 ERA)

OAKLAND ATHLETICS

Billy Burns - CF

Sam Fuld - RF

Brett Lawrie - 2B

Billy Butler - DH

Danny Valencia - 3B

Josh Phegley - C

Mark Canha - LF

Ike Davis - 1B

Marcus Semien - SS

Kendall Chase Graveman - RHP (6-7, 3.84 ERA)

http://www.baseballpress.com/lineups

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 320
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Other teams crush the Orioles 2 strike mistakes. The Orioles seem to strike out looking on most of the other teams 2 strike mistakes. Very confusing how this team strikes out looking so often on pitches right down the middle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly believe this is a big game. We simply cannot afford to lose 2 of 3 to these crummy A's.Plus, everyone else is winning lately.

8 pitch inning is a pretty bad start. Chen should be pretty good though so hopefully the offense can score enough to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paredes has been so bad. Striking out over 40% of the time since the ASB. Dead weight like him and Snider serve no purpose whatsoever.

And what do you know. Lead off walk that doesn't even get moved up. Sad thing is it's not even a surprise anymore with this offense. On the bright side, Davis continues to roll. If only someone other than Manny, Jones, Caleb, or Davis could figure out how to hit...everyone else has been awful lately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly believe this is a big game. We simply cannot afford to lose 2 of 3 to these crummy A's.Plus, everyone else is winning lately.

I think that it's a big game also, but not because it is the crummy Athletics.

I think that it is big simply because we cannot afford to continue to take 3 steps forward and 3 steps back, and subsequently continue to futz around the .500 mark.

We need to win series and KEEP ON winning series, regardless of the opponent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that it's a big game also, but not because it is the crummy Athletics.

I think that it is big simply because we cannot afford to continue to take 3 steps forward and 3 steps back, and subsequently continue to futz around the .500 mark.

We need to win series and KEEP ON winning series, regardless of the opponent.

Yep .500 is not going to get it done. :agree:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that it's a big game also, but not because it is the crummy Athletics.

I think that it is simply because we cannot afford to continue to take 3 steps forward and 3 steps back, and subsequently continue to futz around the .500 mark.

We need to win series and KEEP ON winning series, regardless of the opponent.

Yes. You can say "it's only April," up through July, but at some point the games matter. We are in a lucky situation in that all the wild card teams are close to .500, but we are not going to get in with 85 wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • If you're projecting a future lineup without Mullins in 2026, then EBJ is a reasonable placeholder name to put in there. I would assume most people understand that it's not a sure thing to work out that way. 
    • Every year players are injured sliding head first into bags or even worse home plate. Just noticed that EBJ has a head injury from sliding head first into home (really dangerous and stupid) I'll say it again, what analytics driven organization will be the first to ban head first slides for all of their players I remember when David Sequi was a decent player and ended his career with a serious hand injury sliding head/hand first into home. Cal never slid head first, and wouldn't have been the iron man if he did.
    • Oh, I don't know. I thought when accusing someone of wild malpractice over possibly, maybe, slightly speeding up highlights that kind of opened the door to a little goofy exaggeration.
    • I was going to post something about this after reading about that on MLBTR this morning. That gives me a lot of hope for Bradish if this kid can come back from a UCL sprain and throw 103. Obviously, reliever vs. starter so who knows. But uplifting to read nonetheless. 
    • Hollocher hit almost exclusively 2nd in the order. The Cubs' 3rd hitters (and it was the Cubs, not the Indians as I previously stated) were mostly Marty Krug, Zeb Terry, and John Kelleher. Krug was awful for a 1922 3rd-place hitter, with an 83 OPS+ in his only season as a MLB regular, but he only struck out 43 times in 524 PAs. Terry was worse, OPS+ing 74, but with just 16 Ks in 571 PAs. And Kelleher was the worst of the bunch, OPS+ing 60, while striking out 14 times in 222 PAs. Cubs manager Reindeer Bill Killefer stuck hard and fast to the old rule of thumb that the catcher should bat 8th, even if it's Bob O'Farrell and he hit .324 with an .880 OPS. Ray Grimes had a 1.014 OPS and batted cleanup. But Hack Miller and his .899 OPS batted mostly 6th. Statz wasn't a terrible leadoff hitter, was one of only a couple players who had a SB% higher than 50%, but was 6th among their regulars in OBP. That's as bad a bunch of #3 hitters as I've seen in a while, yet the Cubs finished 80-74-2. Just goes to show you batting order doesn't really matter. Anyway, back to the main point... yes, I'm sure some of Hollocher's CS were busted hit-and-runs. But nobody that regularly batted behind him struck out in even 7% of PAs so they shoulda been putting the ball in play the vast majority of the time.    
    • Bobby needs to git gud. 
    • How many people actually said they were one of the greatest teams ever?   They did hit the snot out of the ball the first 9 games of the year, mostly in a 6 game series in a very hitter-friendly ball park against a bad pitching staff.  That said, they’re still second in the league in runs per game.  Their pitching has been problematic, yielding 6.50 runs per game.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...