Jump to content

Roberts Trade News Thread


McLovin

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 497
  • Created
  • Last Reply
As reported on our front page by Tony. Credit also goes to JoeyR5 for breaking the story.

http://www.orioleshangout.com/article.asp?ID=1297

There are a lot of opinions on this trade all over the place so let's use this thread to discuss the merits of the trades. It's ok to cut and paste your posts from another thread if had put a lot of work into something.

What are your thoughts on the players coming back? Did AM get enough? Did he get the right players? Why no Murton or Pie?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a trade analysis but did anyone notice the Sun changed the title of the MacPhail article??? Earlier it was titled "MacPhail: Trade talks not heating up"....Now it says "Door not closed on free agents".

Just found it interesting. I wondered if the deal went down what AM's response would be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are a lot of opinions on this trade all over the place so let's use this thread to discuss the merits of the trades. It's ok to cut and paste your posts from another thread if had put a lot of work into something.

What are your thoughts on the players coming back? Did AM get enough? Did he get the right players? Why no Murton or Pie?

I. Love. This. Trade.

We get a potential #2-#3 starter that can start for us this year.

A #5 starter that can start for us this year.

And a SS that has the ability to put a .800 OPS out there.

That is quite a haul for a 2B who will not be in his prime the time that we rebuild.

I will Miss Brob to be sure, but Kudos to MacPhail. I really think this is the start of a crazy couple of weeks for trades here in "Birdland". :)

And to answer your question T, No murton because of Luke Scott and Hopefully Clement who can be 1b/DH that Murton would have helped with and no Pie because of Adam Jones. Just my thought on the matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are a lot of opinions on this trade all over the place so let's use this thread to discuss the merits of the trades. It's ok to cut and paste your posts from another thread if had put a lot of work into something.

What are your thoughts on the players coming back? Did AM get enough? Did he get the right players? Why no Murton or Pie?

I like Cedeno more than many here. He has posted an OPS > 900 over his last 500 ABs in AAA. He still has struggled at the ML level, but he's still young. I'm excited to see what he can do here.

Gallagher seems to have a nice upside, and I like his K-rates. Marshall seems solid too, although his K-rates have dropped off the last 2 seasons or so.

I think Pie was never on the table, or else we would have jumped all over it. I like Murton, but I think this team has more need for Cedeno than him. I think leaving him out of the deal probably opened the door for acquiring both Marshall and Gallagher.

Overall, I like this deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are a lot of opinions on this trade all over the place so let's use this thread to discuss the merits of the trades. It's ok to cut and paste your posts from another thread if had put a lot of work into something.

What are your thoughts on the players coming back? Did AM get enough? Did he get the right players? Why no Murton or Pie?

I feel the same way about this trade as I did the Tejada deal....As of right now, I don't like the trade....If it leads to other things, great.

But i think it is strange that we got more value for Miggy than we did BRob even Gallagher is probably has the highest ceiling of any player we got back.

I would have preferred Murton, EPat and Gallagher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Cedeno more than many here. He has posted an OPS > 900 over his last 500 ABs in AAA. He still has struggled at the ML level, but he's still young. I'm excited to see what he can do here.

Overall, I like this deal.

Not to mention Cedeno will be a much better bat for us than Luis Hernandez!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are a lot of opinions on this trade all over the place so let's use this thread to discuss the merits of the trades. It's ok to cut and paste your posts from another thread if had put a lot of work into something.

What are your thoughts on the players coming back? Did AM get enough? Did he get the right players? Why no Murton or Pie?

I think Murton wasn't added because A.F. must feel the corner OF spots and DH are filled or because of the potential Bedard take-in. Pie to me was a classic stand off and Hendry wouldn't budge so they compromised on the talent. Gallagher is obviously the centerpiece in the O's return here, he has very good stuff especially his hook. I honestly think he is a #3 at the very least, he has a good stocky build so he should be durable and a horse if he continues to develope. I really think we gave up on Cedeno too early. Every level he went through he got there early and has shown crazy talent he just hasn't put it together at the bigs yet. I think he ends up being a solid regular especially with his glove. Marshall doesn't K much, but for a kid who never pitched in AAA to have an ERA under 4 pitching at Wrigley is impressive. In the AL I consider him a very productive #5 which all teams need. His only problem is endurance he tends to wear down at the end of the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even though my preference all along was to keep EB & BRob, I am OK with this. I doubt we could have gotten Pie short of having EB included, a 2 for 6-7 type deal. The part I like the most is how much pitching we have, and maybe some of it will turn into some young positional talent sometime down the road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Well, I never said anything about preferring McKenna in my previous post.  I just said I didn't miss watching Austin Hays play and then you just had to ask if that meant I preferred watching McKenna.  What made you assume that I'd think such a thing, I'm not sure. You should know that Hays going down and McKenna coming up doesn't mean that McKenna is all of a sudden taking Hays' at bats full time.  No, it means more playing time in LF for Cowser and McKenna is the last outfielder playing as a defensive replacement and maybe getting a start once a week.  That's it.  That's as far as I thought it through. But since you just had to ask and make me think about it, I think I'd actually watch McKenna full time over Hays right now and I don't have to think twice about it. @Sports Guybeat me to it, but Hays has been so spectacularly bad that McKenna has outperformed him since the All-Star Break last year to present day. Similar stats to what SG showed, I ran them from the ASB last year...of course, McKenna is a part time player so we can't say for certain if he'd be able to replace Hays full time, but he'd have to be really pathetic to be as bad as Hays has been: Hays:  .209/.275/.335 for a 69 wRC+ .   -1.58 in WPA.   McKenna:  .275/.339/.431 for a 116 wRC+. -0.22 in WPA.   Unfortunately fangraphs or bbref doesn't spit out WAR for the amount of time you want to look at, but I can't imagine Hays is in the positive since the ASB last year.  He's certainly in the negative for 2024.  McKenna probably isn't. I get it, McKenna is kind of a doofus and the board's whipping boy for no good reason.  I mean, the dropped ball in Fenway, last year, whatever.  He's a 4th or 5th outfielder, I'm not trying to pretend that he's anything more than that.  But even if McKenna took every day at bats from Hays, I don't know if that'd necessarily be a bad thing.   So actually, thanks for your question.  Yeah, I think I'd prefer to watch McKenna over Hays right now.  At least, I'd like to see if McKenna could be as miserable as Hays has been since mid-July last year...that'd actually be pretty hard to do. I'll leave you with this:  even Mateo has actually been better in every slash category than Hays in the same amount of time since the 2023 ASB:  .231/.283/.388 for a 87 wRC+  
    • Wells could be the answer if he is healthy.  He did a solid job out of the pen his first year here.  Had nerves of steel.  He throws strikes.  Sometimes too many and gives up some bombs but a healthy Wells might be better than a wild and perhaps injured himself Kimbrel.
    • I doubt there is anything much wrong with Kimbrel's head.  He just doesn't have the stuff he used to have and his arsenal doesn't work as well at a lower velocity.  How do you turn him into a 6th or 7th inning pitcher?  He just got older that's all.  Happens to all athletes. That said I'm not an expert on pitching, so anyone out there who knows a lot about it please give us your take.
    • Didn’t know where else to post this. 1. McKenna goes in as a PR has 2B stolen easily and over slides the bag and is tagged out. 2. On the line drive double over his head, which may have been uncatchable, it looked like he took a bad route. 3.  On the sac fly it seemed like he was waiting to see if the runner from 3rd was going.   He was in fairly shallow RF, close to the line, took 3 extra steps before actually throwing the ball.   
    • Tyler Wells is rehabbing his right elbow down in Sarasota. And that’s the extent of any updates. Wells went on the 15-day injured list retroactive to April 13 with inflammation in the elbow. “He’s resting, he’s rehabbing in Sarasota,” Hyde said. “Right now, it’s just letting the inflammation go down.” Asked if there are any concerns with the diagnosis, Hyde said, “We’re just giving him rest right now.” https://www.masnsports.com/orioles-rss/orioles-pregame-notes-on-rodriguez-wells-hays-rotation-and-more
    • Is Wells even pitching yet?
    • He might win Rookie of the Year in the AL. I doubt they are doing a 1:1 if they trade him at all, which I also doubt.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...