Jump to content

Simple question. King Felix or Fielder?


El Gordo

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I don't really want Fielder. I am against the huge, long-term contracts that FA pitchers get. Felix Hernandez seems to be one that could be worth it, since he is 25 now. However he does have 1200 innings logged already. Thats not a TON to have at his age but it is a lot. A six year deal would put him through his age 31 season and (with full season) over 2600 innings pitched. If he can stay healthy through that, then hes going to be worth a big contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does this take into account cost or not? If so, I'd rather have Fielder since, even though he'll be grossly overpaid, he's mostly just going to cost money. The amount of players/prospects it would take to get King Felix would be outrageous, and especially wouldn't make any sense for a club in Baltimore's position. If cost is not a factor, then King Felix, hands down. The guy's an absolute animal, while Fielder is merely just a very good bat. Unless Fielder's market, for whaveter reason, is suppressed this winter, I don't think either is a good decision for the O's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does this take into account cost or not? If so, I'd rather have Fielder since, even though he'll be grossly overpaid, he's mostly just going to cost money. The amount of players/prospects it would take to get King Felix would be outrageous, and especially wouldn't make any sense for a club in Baltimore's position. If cost is not a factor, then King Felix, hands down. The guy's an absolute animal, while Fielder is merely just a very good bat. Unless Fielder's market, for whaveter reason, is suppressed this winter, I don't think either is a good decision for the O's.

Well..dur, I didn't even think about that. Unless I'm wrong his current contract goes through 2014 and he'll be 28. Who knows what it would take to get him. We don't have Bedard anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neither is practical because of their cost IMO, although Fielder is an outside possibility. My question, I suppose, is which do we need more, a big bat or a big arm.

Thats an interesting way to interpret your original post. In that case, I don't think you can answer the question. As a lot of us have said, we need a TOR guy, we need someone who would be a 2 or 3 spot pitcher on a good-decent team and we need 1-2 good bats and 2-3 above average players on the offensive side. I don't know which is the biggest priority, honestly. We've got a lot to address, and only one bat or one arm doesn't improve us enough to change anything. Ask me again at the end of the season when we've seen more things play out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats an interesting way to interpret your original post. In that case, I don't think you can answer the question. As a lot of us have said, we need a TOR guy, we need someone who would be a 2 or 3 spot pitcher on a good-decent team and we need 1-2 good bats and 2-3 above average players on the offensive side. I don't know which is the biggest priority, honestly. We've got a lot to address, and only one bat or one arm doesn't improve us enough to change anything. Ask me again at the end of the season when we've seen more things play out.
I think we already have 3 of those, and possibly even a #1 SP in Britton. We have no real MOO bats.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
    • Yeah, I'd rather keep him over Soto.  I mean Soto can't start.  Yes Soto was dominant at times out of the bullpen but he was also gasoline on a fire out of the bullpen.  I would rather pay Suarez $4 or 5 million, knowing he can start or pitch in the bullpen than Soto, knowing he can only start and is liable to melt down when needed most.  
    • It is funny how much Hays (the pre-2024 version anyway) matches the type of player they'll likely look for. I doubt that reunion happens though. 
    • Weird thing about Suarez is that MASN had this being a 2 year deal when they talked about him back in April. ”The Orioles made another smart move with Suárez by signing him to a two-year contract in September. They knew what they’d ask from him and how it could contradict, and they didn’t want to give him any reasons to resist.” https://www.masnsports.com/blog/another-look-at-how-suarez-came-to-the-orioles
    • Dam the mosquito is in my Jelly. Please go away
    • Elias is refusing to spend money that Rubenstein has made available.  Do you have any sources?
    • Outside Hamilton, I can't really think of any areas or invidivuals outside the line that have really stepped up.  Humphrey and Stephens have played okay but it certainly hasn't offset the complete zeroes that Eddie Jackson and Marcus Williams have been.  I don't think you want to pull Hamilton off SS even though he can handle deep zone assignments fine, because he's essentially a linebacker that can cover wide receivers and there's too much value in that in the box.  And I think that Roquan/Simpson look lost in pass coverage because the safeties behind them are playing like butt.  Besides Roquan wasn't ever really a great coverage safety, he was kind of okay at it but he was never like a Lavonte David or Fred Warner there.   I'm starting to wonder if we need to either trade for a FS and/or start giving Ardarius Washington more snaps.  He certainly doesn't look worse than Jackson/Williams at this point in his limited playing time.  In general i think safety is an undervalued position so we're likely to get good value in trade.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...