Jump to content

Two part Melewski interview with AM about international operations.


Can_of_corn

Recommended Posts

You and me both.

This organizations inability to sign relievers is very disturbing. I know they're a viable bunch, but why is it that we can't find any consistency? Uehara was signed as a starting pitcher, and now he's having success/health because he's back in the role that he's used to (i.e. relief). Johnson is being overworked right now, but he's been pretty darn reliable/solid this year and past. But aside from them, what gives?

Also, I'm not faulting the D-Lee signing entirely, there wasn't much out there and I still think he was the best option [aside from us just missing out on VMart]. That said, who is suggesting to MacPhail to sign guys like Atkins, Vlad, etc.

Vlad was PA IMO. I think AM would have stuck with the 5M offer on his own. Atkins, Gonzo, and Gregg, are real head scratchers for me, especially with the loss of picks..
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply
You and me both.

This organizations inability to sign relievers is very disturbing. I know they're a viable bunch, but why is it that we can't find any consistency? Uehara was signed as a starting pitcher, and now he's having success/health because he's back in the role that he's used to (i.e. relief). Johnson is being overworked right now, but he's been pretty darn reliable/solid this year and past. But aside from them, what gives?

Also, I'm not faulting the D-Lee signing entirely, there wasn't much out there and I still think he was the best option [aside from us just missing out on VMart]. That said, who is suggesting to MacPhail to sign guys like Atkins, Vlad, etc.

Uehara was a starter for almost his entire career in Japan. It's wrong to say that being a reliever is "the role that he's used to."

Kevin Gregg is pitching about as we should have expected. He has a career ERA of 4.00, and 3.51 last year; this year he is at 3.41. He has been a durable guy, and isn't that old for a reliever. You can question the amount we are paying him, and whether he should be the closer, but he is a solid guy to have in the bullpen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Baseball has become a joke when it comes to having an even playing field but my real fear is even if it was even, the Orioles wouldn't do enough to be good in that environment as well.

Amateur acqusitions and the international market is actually a very level playing field. The Pirates and Rays and other teams spend as much or more on signing and developing amateurs as the Yanks or Sox. While we can legitimately complain that the O's have the field slanted against them, they're paying out nearly $100M in major league salaries this year, while no team in the history of MLB has ever paid $30M in a year for amateur acquistions, and most don't spend $10M.

I think it's fairly obvious that the O's most direct path to competition, and one that a lot of teams have already started down long ago, is to spend less on payroll and more on amateur talent. And a substantial amount on international players who aren't going to work out at the same rate as Rule 4 guys, but who can be signed with no limits - you might only get one out of 10 DR prospects to make the majors, but there's nothing stopping you from signing 300 of them. With Rule 4, especially without compensation picks, you're facing a fairly hard limit on the quantity of talent you can bring in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amateur acqusitions and the international market is actually a very level playing field. The Pirates and Rays and other teams spend as much or more on signing and developing amateurs as the Yanks or Sox. While we can legitimately complain that the O's have the field slanted against them, they're paying out nearly $100M in major league salaries this year, while no team in the history of MLB has ever paid $30M in a year for amateur acquistions, and most don't spend $10M.

I think it's fairly obvious that the O's most direct path to competition, and one that a lot of teams have already started down long ago, is to spend less on payroll and more on amateur talent. And a substantial amount on international players who aren't going to work out at the same rate as Rule 4 guys, but who can be signed with no limits - you might only get one out of 10 DR prospects to make the majors, but there's nothing stopping you from signing 300 of them. With Rule 4, especially without compensation picks, you're facing a fairly hard limit on the quantity of talent you can bring in.

I would agree with this and as long as we seem willing to spend 5 M per on the likes of Gonzo, Atkins, and Gregg and lose picks in the bargain. why is it so wastefull to spend 5M per as the MFY's do on international players? We certainly don't have to, and shouldn't, dump it all on one guy whether its a FA RP or a 16YO DR kid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
    • Yeah, I'd rather keep him over Soto.  I mean Soto can't start.  Yes Soto was dominant at times out of the bullpen but he was also gasoline on a fire out of the bullpen.  I would rather pay Suarez $4 or 5 million, knowing he can start or pitch in the bullpen than Soto, knowing he can only start and is liable to melt down when needed most.  
    • It is funny how much Hays (the pre-2024 version anyway) matches the type of player they'll likely look for. I doubt that reunion happens though. 
    • Weird thing about Suarez is that MASN had this being a 2 year deal when they talked about him back in April. ”The Orioles made another smart move with Suárez by signing him to a two-year contract in September. They knew what they’d ask from him and how it could contradict, and they didn’t want to give him any reasons to resist.” https://www.masnsports.com/blog/another-look-at-how-suarez-came-to-the-orioles
    • Dam the mosquito is in my Jelly. Please go away
    • Elias is refusing to spend money that Rubenstein has made available.  Do you have any sources?
    • Outside Hamilton, I can't really think of any areas or invidivuals outside the line that have really stepped up.  Humphrey and Stephens have played okay but it certainly hasn't offset the complete zeroes that Eddie Jackson and Marcus Williams have been.  I don't think you want to pull Hamilton off SS even though he can handle deep zone assignments fine, because he's essentially a linebacker that can cover wide receivers and there's too much value in that in the box.  And I think that Roquan/Simpson look lost in pass coverage because the safeties behind them are playing like butt.  Besides Roquan wasn't ever really a great coverage safety, he was kind of okay at it but he was never like a Lavonte David or Fred Warner there.   I'm starting to wonder if we need to either trade for a FS and/or start giving Ardarius Washington more snaps.  He certainly doesn't look worse than Jackson/Williams at this point in his limited playing time.  In general i think safety is an undervalued position so we're likely to get good value in trade.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...