Jump to content

What would the Hangout be like if the Orioles were good, for once?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Frobby check out the ravens threads. You would have people saying, "If Buck stops winning then he will lose the club house." You would have people complaining if in game management scratches the wrong side of their cup in the second inning. You will still have the, "why did he pull my favorite starter out too soon." You will still have the rest Matt Wieters more crowd. You will have people always wanting more wins/play off victories and people telling you how they should do it.

I do think you would have a bigger crowd of Orioles fans posting positively about the O's though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Just daydreaming here. Let's say the O's were a pretty good team in 2012, and won 85 games or so. What would this place be like? Would people still complain just as much? Would remarks by the GM, manager and players get the same level of scrutiny they get now? Would the same posters be on the same sides of the issues?

Frobby, if you really want to know this, go back and read the threads from June 2005 up to the 19th or so. We were 14 games above .500 on June the 19th. My guess is you will find a lot of euphoria, a bunch of doubters (they were right), some complaining but a lot less than we see now. Mazzilli was a genius to most in early June 2005. Me, I was enjoying the cruise on the good ship Loolipop, little realizing we were about to strike a reef and be cast adrift in a lifeboat. I am still waiting to be rescued.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah but he moved across the country IIRC. Different ISP = different IP address.

See, I am completely out of the Loop. I did, however, spend much of my time as a kid in Memorial Stadium. I touch the foul pole evey time I walk into Camden Yards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does it say about you guys that you make it such an issue that a past poster has a new handle?

I'm not MSK, but I find this borderline wacky.

Are you this guy's biographer?

It's A ban-able offense. Not my rules. The Boss Man's. I happen to fully support them.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does it say about you guys that you make it such an issue that a past poster has a new handle?

I'm not MSK, but I find this borderline wacky.

Are you this guy's biographer?

Most people who have gotten banned have eventually been welcomed back after some time and thought. No so much with people who try to evable the plus premium.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just daydreaming here. Let's say the O's were a pretty good team in 2012, and won 85 games or so. What would this place be like? Would people still complain just as much? Would remarks by the GM, manager and players get the same level of scrutiny they get now? Would the same posters be on the same sides of the issues?

Look at the Ravens threads for your answer to this question. Harbaugh and Flacco have made the playoffs every year here, have won a bunch of road playoff games, have a 67% winning percentage, and currently sit at 7-3 and leading the AFC North again, and YET people still criticize and over-analyze and act like we stink.

So in other words, there would still be complaining, it would just be different complaining.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at the Ravens threads for your answer to this question. Harbaugh and Flacco have made the playoffs every year here, have won a bunch of road playoff games, have a 67% winning percentage, and currently sit at 7-3 and leading the AFC North again, and YET people still criticize and over-analyze and act like we stink.

So in other words, there would still be complaining, it would just be different complaining.

What he said. I'm always amazed how people can be so consistently negative about a team as successful as the Ravens...or really, any winning team. A fan base will always find something to complain about, no matter how good the team.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What he said. I'm always amazed how people can be so consistently negative about a team as successful as the Ravens...or really, any winning team. A fan base will always find something to complain about, no matter how good the team.

It's why people love professional sports. People loooooooooove to second guess & complain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • 1:2 is good.  Elite is a player like Arraez who is 1+:1.  
    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/40027950/ravens-pick-nate-wiggins-nfl-draft-dabo-swinney-text  
    • Was reading Wiggins write up on ESPN. He appears to be more of a home run threat than Koolaid. He had a pick 6 each of the last 2 years.  
    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...