Jump to content

What's the most you would trade for Tex?


mweb

Recommended Posts

I don't see any chance of the Angels and Rangers trading that kind of talent within their division.

Bonderman for Tex is a deal i could see being offered.

I wouldn't say there's no chance of that happening in division. We were working on a major trade with Boston last offseason. I don't think the in division thing is as prominent as it used to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I wouldn't say there's no chance of that happening in division. We were working on a major trade with Boston last offseason. I don't think the in division thing is as prominent as it used to be.

When was the last time a major trade, that involved alot of top young players, occured within a division?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When was the last time a major trade, that involved alot of top young players, occured within a division?

I'm not sure, would have to think about it, but I don't think it's impossible.

If you wanted to trade Miggy or Bedard, and the best offer came from within division, are you saying you wouldn't make that deal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carlos Delgado from the Marlins to the Mets?

Good one although the circumstances of the trade, basically being a salary dump and the 2 teams on different levels in terms of competing, made that a more likely scenario for a trade to be facilitated.

MWEB...I do not think it is impossible but it is highly unlikely that it would happen.

I just don't see Texas letting Tex go to a division rival and i don't see the Angels letting Santana, et al go to Texas.

However, i would say that they are obvious trading partners but i still doubt it happens. I would say the chances are less than 10%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, but SG makes a good point. Marlins & Mets weren't really competitors. I think even the Marlins thought they'd be a bad team this year. The dynamics might be different between Texas and LAA.

Plus the Mets, who can spend well over 100 million, will view prospects/top players alot differently than the Angels and Rangers would.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, but SG makes a good point. Marlins & Mets weren't really competitors. I think even the Marlins thought they'd be a bad team this year. The dynamics might be different between Texas and LAA.

But the Mets were trading top young players to the Marlins who could help the developing Marlins. And it would be stupid of the Mets to count out the Marlins for more than a year with their history of turning things around. Plus, the Marlins have to have some aspirations over the next few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyway, what's the best offer you'd make SG? The 5 for 1 trade?

That is one offer i would make.

I would trade DCab or Penn, along with one of CPat, Gibbons and Benson and one of Hoey or Britton. If they would take Gibbons, would be inclined to throw in another arm like Spoone.

I honestly could make up dozens of trade offers.

As much as it would suck to do it, i would have to turn down Penn and DCab. I can't put 2 of those type guys in the deal.

One guy that hasn't been mentioned is Erbe.

Erbe and Rowell are, IMO, our 2 best prospects and likely, 2 top 50 guys in all of baseball. Erbe, at his age, is at least 2 years away and still has a while to go to get out of the injury age.

So, should we try and trade him or is his upside just too huge?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is one offer i would make.

I would trade DCab or Penn, along with one of CPat, Gibbons and Benson and one of Hoey or Britton. If they would take Gibbons, would be inclined to throw in another arm like Spoone.

I honestly could make up dozens of trade offers.

As much as it would suck to do it, i would have to turn down Penn and DCab. I can't put 2 of those type guys in the deal.

One guy that hasn't been mentioned is Erbe.

Erbe and Rowell are, IMO, our 2 best prospects and likely, 2 top 50 guys in all of baseball. Erbe, at his age, is at least 2 years away and still has a while to go to get out of the injury age.

So, should we try and trade him or is his upside just too huge?

Well I think you need to go to one of the other dozens of offers you have in mind. I don't see that getting it done.

I would prefer to keep Erbe. And again, I'm not even that high on trading much for Tex, so that plays into it as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IYO, if you are Texas, can a deal be made without inlcuding the guys SG listed?

Second question. Regardless of your answer to #1, what do you want, excluding Tejada & Bedard?

No. They'll need more than iffy prospects and average MLers.

If Bedard is off the table, I like Cabrera + Ray, with CPat as a potential sweetener.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. They'll need more than iffy prospects and average MLers.

If Bedard is off the table, I like Cabrera + Ray, with CPat as a potential sweetener.

I think that may get it done.

Deals that would probably get it done:

DC, Penn, CPat, Britton

DC, Ray, CPat

DC, Erbe, CPat, Britton

DC, Reimold, CPat, Britton

Bedard, CPat

Bedard, Hoey

Penn, Erbe, Reimold, CPat

I wouldn't do any of those deals.

I guess you can factor in Gibbons and/or Benson into this, but I really don't see them adding much to the deal. Not much value there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it funny that 3 guys who are top 100 prospects(arguably) are just average.

I assume you mean Reimold, Olson, and Liz as your 3 guys who are top 100 prospects. Good luck with that argument.

And FWIW, I said iffy, not average. Guys like that are nothing if not iffy.

I'll say it again. The Brewers got 4 guys that were instant regulars for Sexson. You're giving two mediocre regulars, and a handful of could-be's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume you mean Reimold, Olson, and Liz as your 3 guys who are top 100 prospects. Good luck with that argument.

And FWIW, I said iffy, not average. Guys like that are nothing if not iffy.

I'll say it again. The Brewers got 4 guys that were instant regulars for Sexson. You're giving two mediocre regulars, and a handful of could-be's.

But Counsell and Spivey were not that good though. Just because they can start, doesn't mean anything.

If that is the case, then i guess my 5 for 1 trade works, as 3 of them can be inserted right now and Olson could be ready as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Yep.  Rotation is better if it stays healthy (massive fingers crossed).  Grayson and Povich are around, too. If/when some of Santander, Mullins, Hays, Kjerstad, Holliday, Mayo start producing the offense should look really good. Replacing Bautista is impossible but I still want another power arm for the pen, though hopefully Wells replaces Baumann at some point.
    • Kremer is usually pretty average with an awful game thrown in once in awhile. I know it’s an intentional reverse jinx thread but you never know with Kremer.
    • I’m starting to ask myself if this team is better than last year’s.  Of course, 1/5 of the way through the season may not be the right time to ask that question, as there are many twists and turns to come.  But I’m asking anyway. Rotation - I have to say this rotation is better than last year’s.   You’ve got Burnes replacing Gibson, a large upgrade, with no disrespect to Gibson, who played an important role last year.  The 2024 version of Irvin looks better than the 2023 version.  Kremer’s ERA doesn’t show it yet, but his repertoire is better with his new splitter.  It looks like we’ll get more than 23.2 innings from John Means.  It’s a little early to say whether Bradish will stay healthy and be up to last year’s standards, but he looked good on Thursday.  We’re still awaiting the return of Wells and GRod, but we have the depth to weather their absence.   Last year the O’s starters were 11th in MLB in ERA at 4.14, 0.31 better than league average, and averaged 5.42 IP/start, 0.28 innings/start above league average.  This year they’re 6th in ERA at 3.28, 0.68 better than league average; and 3rd in IP/start at 5.66, 0.40 IP/start better than league average.  Advantage: 2024.    Bullpen - Not as good as last year.  We didn’t have Felix Bautista for part of 2023, but while we did, he was the best reliever in MLB, was durable, and could throw 2 innings when needed.  Kimbrel has been brilliant at times, but he clearly can’t handle Felix’s workload and isn’t as consistent.  The rest of the pen looks decent but not brilliant.  The return of Cionel Perez helps and if our injured starters return that will push others to the pen.  Last year the O’s had the 5th best bullpen ERA in MLB at 3.55, 0.62 runs per game better than league average; their save rate was 61%, 16th in MLB and 1% below league average. This year they’re at 3.56 ERA, 11th in MLB, 0.37 runs/game better than league average; and the save rate is 61%, 20th in MLB and 2% below league average.  Advantage, 2023 (but not by as much as you might expect). Offense - Though the bats have been a little quiet the last two series and several veterans are struggling, our maturing young players give us a better offense than last year.   Gunnar has taken it up a notch, Westburg is much better, Cowser has cooled lately but provided an early jolt, and Adley just hums along being Adley.  Last year the offense was 7th in runs per game (4.99, 0.37 above league average) and 6th in OPS+ (107); so far this year they are 4th in R/G (5.12, 0.79 above league average) and 2nd in OPS+ (119).  Advantage, 2024. So, overall, the starting pitching and offense are noticeably better than last year’s, and the bullpen isn’t quite as good but not drastically down.  I’m going to say that the 2024 team could be better than 2023’s, though there’s a long way to go this season and a lot could happen.    
    • Some of what we're seeing now is the 40-man creating a nice amount of breathing room for Tyler Wells and Grayson Rodriguez's inflammation to subside. Even Povich we are now around the calendar point Bradish made his MLB debut in 2022.
    • Postgame comments he talked about chasing the groundball double play strategy on the Cano for Kimbrel move once the tying run got to 3rd with one out.    Naturally Cano converted with walk, strikeout, flyball. Not overused, I still feel good Kimbrel is stronger than the Webb-Baumann kind of alternatives. It does maybe mess up the Economic Analyst's long range cost containment plans if Kimbrel can't gather all the Saves. It'll be interesting to see if Suarez can join the Cano-Coulombe tier above Kimbrel in Hyde's circle of trust.    Cionel probably gets there himself with a small additional number of sharp outings. There's mention of will Kimbrel pout if there is role loss, but there's also the side of the coin will some of the other relievers who are better than him get frustrated if the moneymaking particulars stay glued to this particular coworker?
    • There goes that streak.    You’re like the Kevin Brown of OH hangout.   😃 As soon as Brown says Westburg hasn’t made an error in 62 games he makes a bad throw.  As soon as he says Rutschman has the best chase rate in baseball he swings at two pitches way out of the zone.   As soon as Brown says this Oriole reliever hasn’t walked anyone in two weeks I say “Shut up, Kevin!”
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...