Jump to content

Tillman Tonight


OFFNY

Recommended Posts

Glad Tillman is pitching well but he almost pitched a no hitter against the Rangers so this needs to be taken with a grain of salt.

No. No way. He's clearly destined for MLB greatness. In Baltimore or somewhere else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 285
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Glad Tillman is pitching well but he almost pitched a no hitter against the Rangers so this needs to be taken with a grain of salt.

Considering our pitching woes, I might weight it a little more heavily than that, but I get your point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering our pitching woes, I might weight it a little more heavily than that, but I get your point.

Everyone understands that point. We don't need counsel from Sean (or anyone) about being realistic re: Tillman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honest question with those of you preaching patience with Tillman as a SP??? Whats the difference between him and David Hernandez?? A guy who a lot of people were seemingly ready to move to the pen before he even made a ML start. Is it only because Tillman was once a top 30 prospect?? I see two pitchers who are similar in that both struggled to pitch multiple times through an order and get deep into games at the ML level. Both have very similar K/9 and BB/9 rates at the minor league level and as a SP in the bigs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honest question with those of you preaching patience with Tillman as a SP??? Whats the difference between him and David Hernandez?? A guy who a lot of people were seemingly ready to move to the pen before he even made a ML start. Is it only because Tillman was once a top 30 prospect?? I see two pitchers who are similar in that both struggled to pitch multiple times through an order and get deep into games at the ML level. Both have very similar K/9 and BB/9 rates at the minor league level and as a SP in the bigs.

Stuff.

BTW, no one here is preaching patience. Some of us just have it. Most understand why others have gotten frustrated and don't think it's worth their time.

I made an assessment of Tillman a long time ago, and I'm patient because I believe there remains a (decent) chance I'll be proven correct. I know that others probably have less patience because they're less familiar with being proven correct. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stuff.

I disagree. Hernandez had/has very good stuff. Granted it was only two pitches with the fastball/slider but can we honestly say that TIllman's best pitches are as good as Hernandez's 2 pitches. I'll grant you Tillman has a 3rd and 4th pitch with a change and cutter/slider but he's very inconsistent and usually ineffective with both pitches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree. Hernandez had/has very good stuff. Granted it was only two pitches with the fastball/slider but can we honestly say that TIllman's best pitches are as good as Hernandez's 2 pitches. I'll grant you Tillman has a 3rd and 4th pitch with a change and cutter/slider but he's very inconsistent and usually ineffective with both pitches.

Hernandez had two pitches that flashed plus and no workable third pitch. He also struggled to repeat and command both. That's a different profile from Tillman, who has three-to-four pitches, each of which (when he's right) has the potential to be average or better. (That's what I meant by stuff.) And you answered your own question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honest question with those of you preaching patience with Tillman as a SP???

I haven't heard any preaching. Just a bunch of O's fans that are very surprised and happy that Tillman is pitching well again at the AAA level, and that he may eventually get another chance (is some capacity) with the Orioles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stuff.

BTW, no one here is preaching patience. Some of us just have it. Most understand why others have gotten frustrated and don't think it's worth their time.

I made an assessment of Tillman a long time ago, and I'm patient because I believe there remains a (decent) chance I'll be proven correct. I know that others probably have less patience because they're less familiar with being proven correct. ;)

Well, we are usually on the same side and, to be quite blunt, usually correct. We disagree here and while I understand your stubborness your very unlikely to find yourself being proven correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, we are usually on the same side and, to be quite blunt, usually correct. We disagree here and while I understand your stubborness your very unlikely to find yourself being proven correct.

That was a joke. It is true, though, that I get invested in my assessments and am slow to give them up. I think that's true of many on here, but at least I admit it.

That said, I explained the difference between the two above (to the best of my ability), which is really the only relevant part of the discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hernandez had two pitches that flashed plus and no workable third pitch. He also struggled to repeat and command both. That's a different profile from Tillman, who has three-to-four pitches, each of which (when he's right) has the potential to be average or better. (That's what I meant by stuff.) And you answered your own question.

Thats no different than TIllman with any of his pitches really. I mean can you really say Tillman is able to command even his fastball??

We agree that TIllman has a few more worakable pitches which if that's your argument for keeping him in the rotation has some validity. He has enough issues trying to get 2 pitches figured out, let alone his 3rd and 4th pitches. I just think if TIllman were to focus on dialing up the fastball, working on commanding it and the curve/slurve or whatever it is he is throwing now he'll have a good shot at making a successful transition to the pen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Bradley has pretty distinct splits. I think we throw all the LH bats at him tonight: (If Westburg is ready) Gunnar - SS Adley - C O'Hearn - 1B Santander - RF Cowser - LF Westburg - 3B Stowers - DH Mateo - 2B Mullins - CF
    • I don’t want to trade a promising pitcher. We’ve got plenty of position guys, they can get pitching somewhere else.
    • Scott has improved of late, but he’s still walking 7 guys per nine, he has a 1.4 WHIP, and is completely infuriating. When he was here he drove everybody nuts, and when the Marlins traded for him, I knew there was something seriously wrong with that braintrust. Im backing off of Miller, I think he’s coming to earth, and is always close to a TJ vacation, but Scott isn’t the answer at all.
    • The point wasn’t who was better between Irvin or Grayson, it was that if there is even a discussion, Grayson can’t be considered part of a “Big 3”.  After his performance in the playoffs last year and his lack of command so far this season, he needs to show a decent amount of improvement to be looked at that way.
    • https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/grayson-rodriguez-680570?stats=statcast-r-pitching-mlb https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/cole-irvin-608344?stats=statcast-r-pitching-mlb Grayson has a higher ceiling than Cole, I think almost anyone would argue, yes.  But even if we're strictly looking at numbers, despite Grayson's uneven start, he is still statistically better than Cole in a handful of areas (mainly whiff rate, K rate, xBA, xERA).
    • Given his success here and perhaps lack of strong interest elsewhere, I wouldn't be surprised if Lopez would be OK with a minor league deal here.
    • Lots of stats say Irvin hasn’t been better this year. Grayson has had a few rough starts around his injury…he’s been excellent otherwise and has been excellent since he got re-called last year. Irvin is pitching very well but he’s not a sub 3 ERA guy.  He may be a sub 4 ERA guy though. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...