Jump to content

Tillman to start 162


Can_of_corn

Recommended Posts

I think we're lining up to get Darvish if its the Rangers or Straily if its the A's. I'm not sure which I'd rather see.

I wouldn't care if it were Tillman, Hammel, Gonzalez, or Chen. Everything will ride on a Joe Saunders start. I'm not comfortable with that when they could hold Tillman back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 136
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Anderson will pitch for the A's friday, I am pretty sure they said this already. But with Matsuzaka pitching for the Sox I think thats a no doubt yankee win, but we will see.

This is what I read of the situation...

"LHP Brett Anderson took a big step toward being a playoff possibility for Oakland. He threw a 50-pitch bullpen session at the Coliseum on Monday, and he said that it went well and he feels good.

The real test will come Tuesday, when Anderson sees how well he feels following the throwing session. He hasn't pitched for the A's since he strained his right oblique muscle Sept. 19, and as manager Bob Melvin noted, Anderson had a max-effort session Monday.

Anderson also is scheduled for an abbreviated bullpen session Wednesday, which would put him in line to Oakland's first playoff game. The A's likely will play a wild-card game Friday, although they remain in the running in the AL West, one game behind the Rangers with two head-to-head games against Texas remaining.

Melvin said that if Anderson comes out of all his throwing work well, the lefty could be an option in the postseason. The team will want to be assured that Anderson is completely sound physically and that he feels comfortable making a start."

Friday is Tommy Milone's turn to start, and Jarrod Parker would be on turn for Saturday.

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/teams/oak/report

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't care if it were Tillman, Hammel, Gonzalez, or Chen. Everything will ride on a Joe Saunders start. I'm not comfortable with that when they could hold Tillman back.

I don't like depending on Saunders either. It's a tough call either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is completely the wrong decision. I don't think Saunders should be pitching the WC. Saunders made it through a very, very weak BoSox lineup giving up 2 no-doubt-about-it HRs, multiple other xbhs and generous baserunning outs.

I want Tillman on the mound for the first playoff game. He has earned that privilege and he is a significantly better pitcher than Saunders.

I'm in your camp. Play the probabilities. Even if the O's lose and New York loses, then the O's have a better pitcher going in an elimination game. The WC is guaranteed and is far more important than chasing a false hope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct call. Saunders will be available to start the post-season.

That's exactly why I think this is the wrong call. Saunders is a fine back end starter who pitches ok and keeps you in the game most of the time. That's not good enough in a one-game playoff situation. But he'll be the last man standing on Friday night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For people who don't want Tillman starting tomorrow, who would you start instead?

I'm not against Tillman starting tomorrow. But if he wasn't, I'd do a bullpen game with Hunter starting. Ask him to give you 3-4 innings. Turn it over to Matusz, Arrieta, and Patton. Fortunately Tampa's offense is light.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we're lining up to get Darvish if its the Rangers or Straily if its the A's. I'm not sure which I'd rather see.

We've missed Darvish each time we've played TEX this season, haven't we? I don't want to see him. He'll end up getting 20 K's against us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No offense, but I think some of you are being very short sighted. You don't care how tough of a situation the team is being put in just as long as you get to see one playoff game in Camden Yards. We have waited 14 years for this, don't you want it to last a bit longer than 1 game? One game is all it will last if you put Saunders on the mound against Darvish and the Rangers.

Not short-sighted at all. I'm thinking of the parks in which they'd potentially be playing. The Orioles' offense is simply not constructed to win in a park like the Coliseum. Beane has assembled a pitching staff that is built to win there. The Orioles have a history of playing poorly in Oakland. I don't want the Wild Card game being played in that stadium. If the game does go to Oakland, at least Saunders has a history of success there and experience in the playoffs. Overall, I think it makes the most sense to try to win tomorrow and bring the wild card home, with an outside shot of playing for the division.

I will acknowledge that the unfriendly scenario of the Orioles losing tomorrow and Oakland sweeping sends Baltimore to Texas with Saunders pitching if Tillman goes tomorrow. That's not ideal at all. It's definitely a tough call. But I have faith in Tillman winning and I'd agree with Buck sending him out tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For people who don't want Tillman starting tomorrow, who would you start instead?

I was just thinking this. I don't know who else could go. Buck would have to send out Arrieta/Britton/Hunter but I don't see that happening. I'm not thrilled about Saunders starting in a one and done playoff game at all but what else can you do? Buck wants a guaranteed home game and so do I.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • How many starts per week for Kjerstad and where?
    • People are really overanalyzing the promotion of a player that may be on the team for a week. Clearly sending Holliday down wasn't plan A, and neither is bringing up McKenna. If Kjerstad gets sent down when Hays comes back then we have a problem. My main takeaways from this are that Hays is coming back shortly and Kjerstad is going to get Holliday's opportunity in the lineup. Perhaps he runs with it.
    • Well 708 isn’t exactly that good either.  
    • His real age will match his baseball age in June.   He could have a role next year assuming Hays doesn't come back.  
    • High school players are also less likely to make the majors than college players. Picking Abrams or Witt would also increase the chances your 1:1 pick is a bust, or at least less than you hoped for. When I say Adley wasn't a "safe" pick, I meant that the Orioles didn't sacrifice much, if any, ceiling to raise the floor. I remember the vast majority of pundits saying that Adley was the most likely player in the draft to be an excellent baseball player. A few said they thought Witt or Abrams had a higher ceiling, but they also were less likely to reach it than Adley. And even they were like, "slightly higher ceiling, much lower floor, and C is more valuable than SS." Even if more all-star level players come out of high school, in that particular draft Adley was a special player who had a super high floor and a super high ceiling. The fact that high school players are more likely in general to be all-stars shouldn't blind one to the fact that there was an incredibly special college talent available at 1:1. Bottom line is the idea that the O's should have picked anyone other than Adley in that draft was a small minority opinion on draft day, and the fact that Witt and maybe Abrams ended up hitting their ceilings doesn't change the fact that Adley was the obvious choice with the information available at the time, and it's not like it didn't work out awesome for us. I would say Adley is definitely more likely to be a HOF than Abrams and probably Witt, too.
    • Yeah, but Westburg has become such a staple to the lineup and begun to establish himself offensively I thought they might do the Gunnar thing and say 3B is yours.  No more back and forth. 
    • I'm rambling now, but the 1928 A's may have been one of the coolest teams ever to hang around. Not only did they have a bunch of these old IL Orioles, and an unbelievable stock of young talent. But Mack had brought in some old guys, I guess to provide leadership and mentoring and the like. So on this one team they had the younger HOFs: Mickey Cochrane, Al Simmons, Jimmie Foxx, Lefty Grove. They had the Orioles in Boley, Bishop, Grove, Earnshaw. But on top of all that, they had 41-year-old Ty Cobb, 40-year-old Tris Speaker, 41-year-old Eddie Collins, 44-year-old Jack Quinn, and 35-year-old Bullet Joe Bush. Of course Cobb, Speaker, and Collins are inner-circle HOFers, among the best to ever play their position. Quinn was a grandfathered spitballer, probably worthy of a book or three, who won 96 games in his 40s and pitched his last MLB game at the age of 50. And Bush had a 17-year career where he won 196 games. The '28 A's won 98 games and only finished 2.5 games behind a Yanks team that was the freakin' '27 Yanks the year before. For '29 Mack say goodbye to Cobb, Speaker, made Collins a coach, plugged in the kids, and ran away with the league for three straight years. Until the Depression hit, Connie didn't have any other sources of income or wealth, and for the 2nd time had to sell off his stars to make payroll.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...