Jump to content

PECOTA projects the Orioles record at 74-88


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

I think 90 W would be a problem this season. Last year BOS and TOR were poor, they have both improved a lot this season. There should be more parity in the AL East. I see us as an 84-86 W team with the possibility of getting to around 90 W, if the SP improves somewhat and the offense, with Reimold and a healthy Markakis, improves modestly. If the SP struggles we could be in the neighbor hood of .500.I don't see 74 W unless there is a high degree of injury again this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 115
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I think 90 W would be a problem this season. Last year BOS and TOR were poor, they have both improved a lot this season. There should be more parity in the AL East. I see us as an 84-86 W team with the possibility of getting to around 90 W, if the SP improves somewhat and the offense, with Reimold and a healthy Markakis, improves modestly. If the SP struggles we could be in the neighbor hood of .500.I don't see 74 W unless there is a high degree of injury again this year.

I agree, its going to be a 3 headed race all season.

3 teams will be 1-3 games apart.

1 team will be hovering around 10+ games but not out of the race.

1 team will be out of it either due to injury / bad year.

I see it as:

BAL

NYY

TOR

BOS

TAM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been around too long to think that 93 wins last year guarantees a winning season this year. That said, I don't agree with PECOTA's assessment of our pitching staff, and therefore I don't agree with its 74-88 projection. Fortunately, they don't play the game on a computer, they play it on the field. So, I'm ready to watch and see what happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sticking with 85 wins as the record that I see coming up most if the season was played a million times.

A 5 game swing either way wouldn't surprise me.

It'll be really tough to win 93 games again based on just the internal improvement of our roster. Really hard.

If last year's team was a 93 win team, and there has been internal improvement, then there is no way I see a losing record and can definitely see us approaching last year's 93 wins. I think this team will be better than last years. Does that mean 93 wins or more? Not necessarily, but I do see the potential for a lot of improvement in the rotation. I think there is enough depth in the bullpen that we won't see a big drop off there. And, other than 2B, I'm pretty satisfied with the lineup potential, as well. If we had a proven bat in LF, I'd be happier, but I think that McLouth and Reimold, in some combination of at bats, could provide solid production. We don't have Frank Robinson or Eddie Murray in their primes, but we have a pretty deep group of players. I'm not an expert of PECOTA and it's history of accurately predicting team records, but I think that it is understating this teams potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If last year's team was a 93 win team, and there has been internal improvement, then there is no way I see a losing record and can definitely see us approaching last year's 93 wins. I think this team will be better than last years. Does that mean 93 wins or more? Not necessarily, but I do see the potential for a lot of improvement in the rotation. I think there is enough depth in the bullpen that we won't see a big drop off there. And, other than 2B, I'm pretty satisfied with the lineup potential, as well. If we had a proven bat in LF, I'd be happier, but I think that McLouth and Reimold, in some combination of at bats, could provide solid production. We don't have Frank Robinson or Eddie Murray in their primes, but we have a pretty deep group of players. I'm not an expert of PECOTA and it's history of accurately predicting team records, but I think that it is understating this teams potential.

We had a lot of luck last year, for lack of a better term. The one-run record, the extra innings record, they're both unsustainable and will both likely come back to the median this year, even if we do have a good bit of internal improvement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had a lot of luck last year, for lack of a better term. The one-run record, the extra innings record, they're both unsustainable and will both likely come back to the median this year, even if we do have a good bit of internal improvement.
I don't think our 93 wins were entirely dependent on the one-run and extra innings games. The Indians had a great year in one-run games and had an abysmal overall record. We can win fewer one run games if the internal improvement discussed leads to more 2+ run wins. That can mean better pitching from the rotation, which I think is reasonable, and more consistent production from the hitters, which I also think is reasonable.

Every year is different for every team. How we won games last year has little bearing on how we win them this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to the Clubhouse Confidential on MLB Network, PECOTA projects the Orioles record at 74-88.

So we have Vegas giving us the over/under at 76.5 and PECOTA projected 74 wins.

I know this has been beat into the ground, but it does goes to show that besides some optimism from the fans and organization, most people predict a deep dive for the Orioles in 2013.

Me, I think we're about an 82 win team give or take 4-5 wins.

I hope Buck is blasting this kind of stuff all through the clubhouse. As he's said before, this is a team full of guys who've been told they can't (Guys like McClouth, Davis, Hammel, the list goes on) and have excelled. I think they can really thrive off this me-against-the-world type attitude. Much like the Ravens (No Weapon!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think anyone predicted the Orioles record correctly last year...including anyone on here. I am no worried about anyone's predictions. The starting pitching will determine how well this team does this year. I think it can be better than last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had a lot of luck last year, for lack of a better term. The one-run record, the extra innings record, they're both unsustainable and will both likely come back to the median this year, even if we do have a good bit of internal improvement.

Luck is a hard word for me to accept. I think the "luck" you refer to favors hard work and determination. Its not like the O's rolled a pair of die to win those close ball-games. They had the intestinal fortitude and where-with-all to get it done when it counted most.

A lot of the saber guys on here look at baseball as more of a (somewhat random) dispersion of statistics. I've noticed that its hard for many to see that things like these are less about luck, and more about determination and will to win. Look at the Ravens... sure they had some things go their way (every champion does). But what really brought them through all those tough situations (4th quarter in Denver, the goal-line stand in the SB) was the sheer will to win. They wanted it more, just like this Orioles team did last season.

I don't think you see hard-core "reversions to the mean" because this team isn't to be measured against the statistical "norm." They are by-far no normal team. They have a synergy that Buck has helped create and hone.

That's how I see it anyhow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think anyone predicted the Orioles record correctly last year...including anyone on here. I am no worried about anyone's predictions. The starting pitching will determine how well this team does this year. I think it can be better than last year.

The pitching appears to be as deep as the Marianas Trench. It will keep us in most games.

Strong pitching and mediocre offensive production (another reason for the glut of one-run wins rather than "luck.")

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luck is a hard word for me to accept. I think the "luck" you refer to favors hard work and determination. Its not like the O's rolled a pair of die to win those close ball-games. They had the intestinal fortitude and where-with-all to get it done when it counted most.

A lot of the saber guys on here look at baseball as more of a (somewhat random) dispersion of statistics. I've noticed that its hard for many to see that things like these are less about luck, and more about determination and will to win. Look at the Ravens... sure they had some things go their way (every champion does). But what really brought them through all those tough situations (4th quarter in Denver, the goal-line stand in the SB) was the sheer will to win. They wanted it more, just like this Orioles team did last season.

I don't think you see hard-core "reversions to the mean" because this team isn't to be measured against the statistical "norm." They are by-far no normal team. They have a synergy that Buck has helped create and hone.

That's how I see it anyhow.

I get what you mean, but it certainly has been shown in baseball history that teams with an excellent record in one-run games usually aren't able to repeat that feat the following year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also said, "for lack of a better term".

Someone, or some team, might be the best tightrope walkers in the world but pretty soon they're going to fall.

And with the bullpen being the most volatile part of a baseball team year to year, the bullpen is the area where I see most of the regression taking place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luck is a hard word for me to accept. I think the "luck" you refer to favors hard work and determination. Its not like the O's rolled a pair of die to win those close ball-games. They had the intestinal fortitude and where-with-all to get it done when it counted most.

A lot of the saber guys on here look at baseball as more of a (somewhat random) dispersion of statistics. I've noticed that its hard for many to see that things like these are less about luck, and more about determination and will to win. Look at the Ravens... sure they had some things go their way (every champion does). But what really brought them through all those tough situations (4th quarter in Denver, the goal-line stand in the SB) was the sheer will to win. They wanted it more, just like this Orioles team did last season.

I don't think you see hard-core "reversions to the mean" because this team isn't to be measured against the statistical "norm." They are by-far no normal team. They have a synergy that Buck has helped create and hone.

That's how I see it anyhow.

I think talent wise, this team wins 86-90 games. Add in the intangibles and this team does better. I'm predicting 97 but would settle for 93

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
    • Boy,  that Jackson Merrill is a good young player that is playing his best ball down the season stretch and in the playoffs.   He's only 21.  I guess some young guys are able to play up to the pressure.   Who could have guessed that?
    • I’m aware.   You are arguing something im Not.
    • What agreement? The agreement you are talking about happened as a result of the move.  The MASN agreement would not have existed if Angelos had gone to court to block the move.
    • I’m saying the Os had an agreement with MLB and that should have held up.  Been pretty clear about that. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...