Jump to content

Adam Jones- Where are the homeruns?


atom_25

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 367
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Adam Jones BB% has sky rocketed this season. K% is within his normal range.

Career: 4.5%

Career low in 2014: 2.8%

2015: 4.1%

2016: 6.7%

Interestingly, we have seen this before.

2009: 6.9%.

Does this have something todo with leading off? He has lead of every game since May 27. None before it.

1st: 6.3%, 144 PA

2nd: 0.0%, 23 PA

3rd: 7.7%, 117 PA

4th: 3.9%, 18 PA

5th: 4.2%, 12 PA

I'm going to say no, leading off has nothing todo with it. The low PA's when batting 2,4, or 5 are insignificant.

My guess, Buck is had him leading off because he likes the power at the top of the order and because Adam was already taking more walks. Like he did in 2009.

Why the increase BB%? Inexplicable. Lets just hope it continues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adam Jones BB% has sky rocketed this season. K% is within his normal range.

Career: 4.5%

Career low in 2014: 2.8%

2015: 4.1%

2016: 6.7%

Interestingly, we have seen this before.

2009: 6.9%.

Does this have something todo with leading off? He has lead of every game since May 27. None before it.

1st: 6.3%, 144 PA

2nd: 0.0%, 23 PA

3rd: 7.7%, 117 PA

4th: 3.9%, 18 PA

5th: 4.2%, 12 PA

I'm going to say no, leading off has nothing todo with it. The low PA's when batting 2,4, or 5 are insignificant.

My guess, Buck is had him leading off because he likes the power at the top of the order and because Adam was already taking more walks. Like he did in 2009.

Why the increase BB%? Inexplicable. Lets just hope it continues.

Maybe Scotty's influence with Adam is paying off?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
o

(vs. ANGELS, July 8th)

NUMBER 17

ADAM LaMARQUE JONES

ADAM LaMARQUE JONES

ADAM LaMARQUE JONES

ADAM LaMARQUE JONES

ADAM LaMARQUE JONES

ADAM LaMARQUE JONES

ADAM LaMARQUE JONES

No offense but it's hard to be in a celebratory mood when the team is down by 7 runs. :noidea:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

None taken.

It's my fault for posting it as late as I did. It was a 2-1 game when he hit it.

This team is just depressing to watch right now. All of these hitters having great years and it's slowly going to waste because the starting pitching is completely incapable of having a shutdown inning after the offense scores runs for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
I tell you the truth guys, I would seriously consider trading Adam Jones for Chris Sale. I think the Whitesox would consider that deal. Any thoughts.

You're kidding, right? You think the White Sox are going to trade Chris Sale for one player, who is 3 years older than Sale?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I doubt Ortiz will have an 800+ OPS all year but I guess its possible. Right now the trade looks like a win for both teams. Milwaukee of course gets 5 more years after this to fully reap the benefits. 
    • Probably because of pitch count. Doesn’t change my point. 
    • Robert would be a significant upgrade over Mullins (offensively). Not sure how much of a difference the two have defensively. But as much as I like Mullins, he has been really bad with the bat in his hand for about a season now. Second half of last season and most of the first half of this season. Obviously the issue with Robert is his health/availability, so there would be risk there. But I wouldn't mind if Elias took a swing there, as long as this wouldn't be his only move. I would like to see Elias act bold and decisively this go round (at the deadline). I heard that the CHI SOX wanted a "Soto like" package (that the Nats got for trading him to the Pads) back for Robert. We know that they have a recent history of over asking on players they are in theory willing to trade. Anybody have a guess on what the realistic costs for Robert would be?
    • This is all correct. And to add to it, If Gunnar only continues being this version of Gunnar, he is out-valued only by the sole two-way player in baseball (Ohtani). So, comparing Soto to Gunnar in a vacuum might make some sense, their situations are vastly different. The closeness of the young guys has been well documented and we know that the group of Adley, Gunnar, Mountcastle, Stowers, Westy and Cowser are all strong in their faith. I do believe that will play some part in the contract finagling. I do not know any of them personally and with the union, the pressure of the sport, endorsements, etc. etc. ... I realize that at the end of the day guys are going to want what they are worth but I have long thought two things about this crop of players: they are incredibly consistent but they also seem to be genuinely good kids who want to win and put the team first. We don't know yet what will happen over the next few years with these players but I wouldn't be surprised to see a version of what the cast of Friends did early in the show's run, where they essentially formed their own union of sorts and structured their compensation so that none of them would become bigger than the sum of their parts. Again, I don't know them personally and I am fully in-tune with the idea that they all want to be paid but I think that their closeness means more to them than Soto's relationship with his teammates in Washington, and I think that holds true with respect to almost literally any other free agent in the history of the game. They are very unique in that they have this young group who are all 23 - 27 right now who are very tight. I happen to think that the stars of this team will be more inclined to consider more team-friendly deals if it means that their posse can stay in-tact for a longer duration of time. Call me naïve but that's how I see it. I've been intimately involved in the game at various levels myself and I can honestly say that I can't remember a group of young players who demonstrated a caring for each other to the same level of these kids. It could mean nothing when Gunnar is being thrown half a billion dollars or when Adley is offered the moon but I just don't see these players being as motivated by money as other (especially recent) stars.  I agree 100% that Gunnar would jump all over that Witt Jr. deal. I think he is smart enough to know that anything could happen over the next five years. Plus $288 million is a shitload of money. I don't know how  many generations of wealth that is but damn that's a lot of money for a soon to be 23 year old kid.   
    • There is a lot to like and I can't see why nobody would want him but for the possibility that he won't help the team much in October 2024, the cost would probably be an absurd ask.
    • I think the focus is going to be on relief pitching.   I don't think any of the guys SG listed would be needed for the types of relievers the O's will be going after.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...